Wall St.Journal Weekend 29Feb2020

(Jeff_L) #1

A4| Saturday/Sunday, February 29 - March 1, 2020 PWLC101112HTGKRFAM123456789OIXX **** THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.


WASHINGTON


WIRE


Dispatches from the
Nation’s Capital

BYGABRIELT.RUBIN


POLITICS


this or any future administra-
tion accountable.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
(D., Calif.) said the House
would seek an en banc deci-
sion from the court, asking the
full panel to review the case.
The three-judge panel that
ruled was made up mostly of
conservative judges, while the
full court leans liberal. Even-
tually the case could land be-
fore the Supreme Court.
The Democratic-led Judi-
ciary Committee issued the
subpoena last year as it was
examining possible miscon-
duct by Mr. Trump, including
whether he obstructed special
counsel Robert Mueller’s in-
vestigation into Russian inter-
ference in the 2016 U.S. presi-
dential election. The White
House instructed Mr. McGahn
not to appear.

The subpoena came months
before the House impeached
Mr. Trump on other allegations
of misconduct, related to his
dealings with Ukraine. The Sen-
ate acquitted him on Feb. 5.
House lawyers had previ-
ously suggested to judges that
the House could potentially
consider an additional article
of impeachment if Mr. Mc-
Gahn provided new evidence
regarding Mr. Trump and the
Mueller probe.
Friday’s decision reverses a

trial judge who ruled last No-
vember that Mr. McGahn had
to comply.
Judge Griffith, a George W.
Bush appointee, was joined in
the decision by Judge Karen
Henderson, a George H.W.
Bush appointee. He said Con-
gress had other tools to use
against the White House, such
as holding officials in con-
tempt, withholding appropria-
tions and disrupting the presi-
dent’s legislative agenda.
In dissent, Judge Judith
Rogers, a Clinton appointee,
said the ruling “removes any
incentive for the executive
branch to engage in the negoti-
ation process seeking accom-
modation, all but assures future
presidential stonewalling of
Congress, and further impairs
the House’s ability to perform
its constitutional duties.”

The White House
had instructed Mr.
McGahn not to
appear.

DEMOCRATS’ WARINESS OF
WALL STREET MONEYhas
complicated the political giving
of one of the Street’s most
prominent M&A lawyers.
H. Rodgin Cohen, chairman of
law firmSullivan & Cromwell,is
a prolific Democratic donor, giving
to state parties and House, Sen-
ate and presidential campaigns.
He has donated between $2,
and $5,600 to six Democratic
Senate challengers and four in-


cumbents running for re-election
this cycle—Michigan’s Gary Pe-
ters, Alabama’s Doug Jones, Min-
nesota’s Tina Smith and Virginia’s
Mark Warner. He has donated to
multiple Democratic presidential
campaigns, including Joe Biden’s
and Pete Buttigieg’s.
But Buttigieg returned Co-
hen’s donations following a
flurry of press about Cohen’s
Wall Street dealings, which in-
cluded advising firms at the cen-
ter of the 2008 financial crisis
such as Lehman Brothers and
American International Group
Inc. (Some candidates, such as
Sens. Bernie Sanders and Eliza-
beth Warren, have been explicit
about not accepting any finan-
cial-industry donations.)
The campaigns were con-
tacted by the Journal and in-
formed of Cohen’s Wall Street
history, as well as his 2015 re-
view of Hollywood producer Har-
vey Weinstein’s personnel file for
his company’s board, in which Co-
hen found “no unresolved claims
that could result in liability.” After
being asked for comment, the
Peters and Jones campaigns said
they were each donating $5,
to nonprofits focused on sexual

assault, equivalent to the amount
of Cohen’s donations.
Weinstein Co.’s board hired Co-
hen to look at the file after Wein-
stein’s expenses and women’s al-
legations of misconduct came to
their attention. Cohen’s review of
Weinstein preceded the board’s
decision to renew Weinstein’s
contract later that year. Wein-
stein was convicted on sex-
crimes charges this week in New
York. Cohen declined to comment.
Warner’s campaign declined to
comment. The Smith and Biden
campaigns didn’t respond to re-
quests for comment.

TRUST IN AMERICAN INSTITU-
TIONSfaces yet another test
with the coronavirus epidemic.
Some public-health experts are
alarmed at the rhetoric of
elected and Trump administra-
tion officials relating to the out-
break. Some have presented a
rosy outlook for the virus, with
White House adviser Larry Kud-
low on Tuesday saying the virus
is contained, contradicting Cen-
ters for Disease Control officials.
“The impulse to mitigate eco-
nomic harm is not a bad one,”
said Margaret Bourdeaux, re-

search director for Harvard Belfer
Center’s Security and Global
Health Project. “But you can’t PR
your way out of a crisis.”
Republican Sen. Tom Cotton
and Homeland Security’s Ken
Cuccinelli have suggested that
the virus could have been devel-
oped as a biological weapon in a
laboratory in Wuhan, China, the
epidemic’s epicenter. Scientists
pushed back in the medical jour-
nal Lancet. “We stand together
to strongly condemn conspiracy
theories suggesting that
COVID-19 does not have a natural
origin,” they wrote of the virus.

MASSACHUSETTSsees a dog-
fight ahead of its Super Tuesday
primary. Warren’s advisers be-
lieve they can win her home
state, though some have said
they expect a competitive race.
A recent poll shows Warren and
Sanders almost tied in the state,
with Buttigieg, Biden and Mi-
chael Bloomberg not far behind.
Warren received a boost from
the Boston Globe on Wednes-
day, which endorsed her after
saying in December 2018 that
she shouldn’t run.
Sanders makes an overt play

for the state with rallies there
Friday and Saturday. Buttigieg
put staffers on the ground in
Massachusetts last week, and
Bloomberg opened a Boston
suburban field office in Medford,
his hometown, with actor Mi-
chael Douglas. Sen. Amy Klobu-
char has made digital ad invest-
ments and aims to pick off
delegates in specific congressio-
nal districts. Biden still has
hopes of winning the state or at
least amassing delegates. He has
won the support of numerous
state party and union leaders.

ANTI-PIPELINE ACTIVISTSaim
to push fight against Atlantic
Coast Pipeline into public con-
sciousness, like previous battles
against Keystone and Dakota
Access pipelines. The Supreme
Court heard oral arguments
Monday on whether to reinstate
a construction permit for the
pipeline, which would be built
through two national forests
and the Appalachian Trail.
Twelve activists were arrested
outside the court as a majority
of the justices signaled they are
likely to allow the permission
process to go forward.

AMERICAN CATHOLICSdisap-
prove of Trump at similar rates
as the general population, and
most would favor a Democratic
challenger over the president in
the election, according to a new
poll from RealClear Opinion Re-
search and EWTN News, a Cath-
olic broadcast network. Among
devout Catholics, who accept all
or most of the Church’s teach-
ings, Trump’s approval ratings
are the highest: 63%, with 59%
planning to vote for him. The de-
vout Catholics surveyed were
41% Hispanic, which suggests
higher support for Trump than
the Hispanic population at large,
which gave Trump around 28%
of their votes in 2016, according
to exit polls.

MINOR MEMOS:Department of
Homeland Security makes gram-
mar error in rule about legal im-
migrants’ English proficiency....Sen.
Chuck Schumer confirms he
spent $8,600 of campaign funds
on New York restaurant Junior’s
cheesecake in past de-
cade....Singer Garth Brooks’ fans
mistake his Detroit Lions Barry
Sanders jersey for signal of sup-
port for Bernie Sanders.

about the independence of the
Justice Department.
In the Stone case and other
matters, Mr. Barr has denied
he is acting in a way that fa-
vors Mr. Trump. His allies
have said he believes he is
making the right calls without
concern for politics.
The committee wants to
hear from the prosecutors who
withdrew from the Stone case,
as well as those overseeing or
involved in several other in-
vestigations and reviews or-
dered by Mr. Barr.
Among them are Connecti-
cut’s U.S. attorney John Dur-
ham, who is reviewing the ori-
gins of the FBI’s Russia probe
at Mr. Barr’s behest; Timothy
Shea, a close adviser to Mr.
Barr whom he installed as the
top federal prosecutor in the
District of Columbia just be-
fore the Stone sentencing;
Pittsburgh’s U.S. attorney
Scott Brady, who has been
given responsibility for receiv-
ing and reviewing information
about Ukraine from Mr.
Trump’s personal attorney,
Rudy Giuliani; and Geoffrey
Berman, U.S. attorney in Man-
hattan, whose office is investi-
gating Mr. Giuliani’s business
dealings in Ukraine.
A Justice Department
spokeswoman declined to com-
ment. It isn’t clear whether the
department will make any of
them available to answer the
committee’s questions. The de-
partment historically has de-
clined to let prosecutors an-
swer questions about active
and continuing investigations.

The House Judiciary Com-
mittee said Friday it wants to
talk to more than a dozen fed-
eral prosecutors, including those
involved in the sentencing of in-
formal Trump adviser Roger
Stone, as part of a broader ex-
amination into whether the
White House is interfering in
the Justice Department’s tradi-
tionally independent affairs.
Chairman Jerrold Nadler,
(D., N.Y.) said in a letter to At-
torney General William Barr
that he wants testimony from
or interviews with the officials.
Mr. Barr has himself agreed to
testify on March 31 about his
decision to overrule prosecu-
tors’ sentencing recommenda-
tion in Mr. Stone’s case.
Prosecutors had recom-
mended a seven-to-nine year
sentence for Mr. Stone, based
on the sentencing guidelines
the Justice Department applies
in all criminal cases, but were
overruled within hours by Mr.
Barr, who ordered a new filing
calling for a lesser penalty un-
der a more lenient interpreta-
tion of the guidelines. That
prompted the withdrawal of
four prosecutors involved in
the case and raised questions
about whether the attorney
general was tilting the scales
to benefit a Trump associate.
A judge sentenced Mr.
Stone to three years and four
months in prison. The episode
touched off weeks of political
furor in Washington and
fueled intensifying debate

BYSADIEGURMAN
ANDSIOBHANHUGHES

Lawmakers Seek to


Question Prosecutors


would beat Mr. Trump.
“We are putting together the
strongest grass roots movement
we’ve seen in a long time,” he
said, to cheers. “We are beating
Trump because our agenda is
the agenda of the working fami-
lies of this country.”
State Rep. Justin Bamberg, a
longtime Sanders backer who
represents a rural district in
the central part of South Caro-

lina, said Mr. Sanders would
bring voters to the polls, which
he said will help other Demo-
crats on the ballot. To say oth-
erwise is a scare tactic, he said.
“If you can’t beat him
straight up, you play Jenga
with him, and try to undermine
him,” he said. “It’s not gonna
work.”
Across the border in North
Carolina, Mr. Sanders’s ascen-

dancy sent some leading Dem-
ocrats from supporting former
Vice President Joe Biden to ral-
lying behind Mr. Bloomberg.
At a recent Bloomberg rally
in Raleigh, Senate Minority
Leader Dan Blue said a far-left
candidate like Mr. Sanders
would lose big in a state nearly
evenly split between Republi-
cans and Democrats, where
President Obama won in 2008

and lost in 2012.
A loss at the top of the
ticket could jeopardize Demo-
cratic Gov. Roy Cooper’s re-
election chances as well as
Democrats’ prospects of gain-
ing seats in the GOP-led legis-
lature, said Mr. Blue, who in
his previous role was the first
African-American speaker of
the state House. Mr. Cooper
won the governor’s chair in

2016 by roughly 10,000 votes—
out of more than five million
cast.
Democrats won enough
seats in 2018 to break a GOP
supermajority in the North
Carolina House, and they
picked up seats in the Senate,
making it easier to advocate
for increased teacher pay and
other Democratic priorities,
Mr. Blue said. Maintaining or
adding to their ranks is critical
in 2020 because of the coming
round of redistricting and the
possibility of approving Medic-
aid expansion, he said.
“Who we nominate matters
for our country, but it also
matters for our state races,”
Mr. Blue said. “Beating Trump
is one thing, but after that, we
have a lot of problems to
solve.”
Earlier this week, Florida
Democrats fretted over Mr.
Sanders’s potential alienation
of constituencies like Cuban-
Americans and Jewish voters,
with his characterization of the
late Fidel Castro’s education
policies in Cuba and his stated
refusal to attend the annual
conference of the American-Is-
rael Public Affairs Committee.
The Florida Democratic Party
issued a statement noting that
party members “need to un-
derstand our immigrant com-
munities’ shared stories.”
In South Carolina, Demo-
cratic leader Mr. Rutherford
said a Sanders nomination
would wipe out the hope of
picking up seats in fast-grow-
ing places, including suburbs of
Charlotte that are just south of
the state line.

MYRTLE BEACH, S.C.—Some
Democrats in Southern states
are anxious about Bernie Sand-
ers winning the Democratic
presidential nomination, saying
it could jeopardize a closely
won governor’s seat, reverse
recent gains in state legisla-
tures and turn what might be
competitive congressional
races into GOP landslides.
South Carolina House Mi-
nority Leader Todd Rutherford
said Mr. Sanders, who has
surged to the top of the na-
tional polls in the Democratic
presidential primary, would
bomb with South Carolina
Democrats, including the so-
cially and fiscally moderate
constituents in his predomi-
nantly African-American dis-
trict that includes Columbia.
Mr. Rutherford endorsed
candidate Michael Bloomberg,
even though the former New
York mayor isn’t on the ballot
in Saturday’s primary. He said
he wanted to send up a flare
that Democrats need resources
and momentum to derail a
Sanders nomination and beat
President Trump.
“How do we explain to our
people what democratic social-
ism is when we don’t even
know?” Mr. Rutherford said,
referring to Mr. Sanders’s self-
described ideology. “It would
be a bloodbath.”
At a Wednesday rally of
2,800 people in this fast-grow-
ing retiree mecca, Mr. Sanders
said his critics were ignoring
nearly 50 national polls that
show he is the candidate who


BYVALERIEBAUERLEIN


Sanders Sparks Down-Ballot Fears in South


Sen. Bernie Sanders says his critics are ignoring polls that show he is the candidate who can beat President Trump.

VICTOR J. BLUE FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

WASHINGTON—A divided
federal appeals court took a
hands-off approach to a sub-
poena battle between Con-
gress and the White House,
ruling it wasn’t the judiciary’s
place to decide whether for-
mer White House counsel Don
McGahn must testify in a con-
gressional investigation of
President Trump.
“Letting political fights play
out in the political branches
might seem messy or imprac-
tical, but democracy can be a
messy business, and federal
courts are ill-equipped to mi-
cromanage sprawling and
evolving interbranch informa-
tion disputes,” Judge Thomas
Griffith wrote for the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Dis-
trict of Columbia Circuit.
The decision came on a 2-
to-1 vote. The ruling comes
amid an array of ongoing
clashes between the White
House and House Democrats
leading investigations into the
Trump administration. It
could set a new marker sug-
gesting the courts won’t be
willing to resolve those show-
downs, at least in some cir-
cumstances.
The precedent, if it stands,
could also allow this adminis-
tration and future ones more
room to give Congress the
cold shoulder when lawmakers
make requests for information
and testimony.
House Judiciary Committee
Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D.,
N.Y.) said in a statement that
the ruling, if upheld, “would
destroy the power of Congress
to gather information and hold


BYBRENTKENDALL


Court Won’t Force McGahn to Testify


Former White House counsel Don McGahn was subpoenaed last year by a House committee.

OCTAVIO JONES/TAMPA BAY TIMES/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Free download pdf