Astronomy - USA (2020-06)

(Antfer) #1
10 , 000 100 , 000 1 , 000 , 000 10 , 000 , 000 100 , 000 , 000

100

1 , 000

10 , 000

N
oi
se

Signal Point-spread^ function

Full-width

Half-maximum

56 ASTRONOMY • JUNE 2020


technique that eliminates any
noise when making the mea-
surement. After that, I need
to minimize other sources of
error. This is done using tech-
niques that any amateur can
learn; you may already be
using some if you image.
The first technique, called
aperture photometry, involves
performing a differential pho-
tometric measurement using
an aperture to restrict the light
to a given area of the detector
(a CCD or CMOS chip) cen-
tered on the star. Another


area, called the annulus, which
surrounds the aperture, allows
you to measure the sky bright-
ness. The individual bright-
ness of a star is measured by
subtracting the sky measure-
ment from that of the star (see
“Starlight minus sky” on
page 54). After these values are
obtained for the target and
comparison stars, the differ-
ence between them results in a
series of differential photomet-
ric measurements that are
used to create the light curve.
This effectively cancels out
any brightness changes, such
as dimming by a passing thin


cloud, that affect all the stars
in an individual image.
Additionally, there are
three types of error you must
correct or minimize. One is
systematic error (image defects
and errors). The other two are
random errors (shot noise
error and scintillation error).
For the systematic error, I use
the standard method of cali-
bration used by most astro-
photographers when they
image deep-sky objects. The
RAW images are calibrated
prior to doing any measure-

ments using aperture photom-
etry. This corrects them for
bias (readout) noise, dark
(thermal) noise, and differ-
ences in the detector’s pixel
response. Applying these cor-
rections takes care of most of
the noise as well as image
defects, such as vignetting and
dust, within the camera and
optical train.
Nevertheless, even after
calibration, a small source of
systematic error remains. This
is called residual calibration
error (RCE), which involves
small variations from pixel to
pixel. You can eliminate RCE

by keeping the star on the
same pixels over several hours.
Although it typically totals
less than a half percent, it is
a significant portion of the
error when you want to reveal
exoplanets. RCE can be
reduced through a high level
of control when tracking a
target accurately for long
periods. Unfortunately, this
can be expensive and time-
consuming for most amateurs.
There are also several ran-
dom errors. When sampling
light, the photons arrive at

random intervals, causing
an error in the signal called
Poisson (shot) noise. Shot
noise is related to the particle
nature of light. When doing
photometry, we are counting
the number of photons that hit
each pixel. The detector con-
verts the photons to a numeric
value. Quantum efficiency of
cameras vary, but it can
exceed 75 percent of all the
photons hitting the chip. The
shot noise error value is pro-
portional to the square root of
the total count recorded. As
the number of photons col-
lected increases, so does the

signal-to-noise ratio, which
increases the shot noise accu-
racy (see “Signal beats noise”
at upper left). The overall mea-
surement, then, is limited only
by the scintillation error.
Scintillation is an error
that divides into short-term or
long-term. Short-term scintil-
lation noise is caused by
atmospheric conditions that
make stars appear to twinkle,
and is an indication of the
seeing (atmospheric steadi-
ness). Until recently, the only
way to significantly reduce
short-term scintillation error
was to avoid times and/or
locations where it was high.
Long-term scintillation noise
is a slow change in the star’s
brightness caused by the slow
movement of high clouds and
variations over time in the
sky’s brightness and haze
(transparency). It can be
largely avoided by taking
observations on clear nights.

A new method for
high-precision
photometry
A long-used technique for
doing high-precision pho-
tometry is called the defocus
method. Defocusing the tele-
scope increases the shot noise
precision of the measurement
by spreading the light out

The more photons a detector collects, the better the signal-to-noise
ratio will be. ASTRONOMY: ROEN KELLY AFTER JERRY HUBBELL

Collecting data through a defocused telescope produces a bell-
shaped point-spread function. RACHEL KENOPA GOOD

Today, just about anyone can make precise


measurements of stars from their backyard.


SIGNAL BEATS NOISE OUT OF FOCUS

Free download pdf