MOVIEMAKER.COM SPRING 2020 77
DeSales.edu/TVFilm Center Valley, PA
Han
ds-
On P
rod
uct
ion •
(^) Story
- Driv
en^ •^ Digita
l Cinema Workflow • (^) Adob
e, Avid
& DaV
inci •
(^) Sou
nd (^) D
esig
n (^) &
Rec
ord
ing
(^) • A
nim
ati
on
G^ •
ra
ph
Aic
srt
Te•
vle
iois
Sn
dut
(^) • io
ruJ^
die
mlFi
se F
avit
tS^ • l
A^ ydu
d aorb
tS (^) • g nironteM dnas pihsnertnI •
o-eta
eht-f
t rA-
uqE
empi
(^) • n
orC
- ss
isD
ipc
inl
rya
o C
all
ob
rat
ion
s^ •
Sa
les
ian
Va
lue
s•^
(^)
A Career in TeleVision & Film
is waiting for you at DSU!
NYC FILM SCHOOL
OnSET
http://www.onsetfilmschoolnyc.com
http://www.pipeline-talent.com
PIPELINE ENTERTAINMENT
Upon completion we will help place you in the marketplace
via our partners at EMMY AWARD WINNING
In year 1 you will learn the business and the creative
via exclusive access to industry professionals
-- It’s like paying for Film School, and the Film School pays you back --
LEARN FROM THOSE WHO DO - OWN YOUR EDUCATION
Your tuition is a 100% (+15%) recoupable investment in that film
End of year 1 you will hands-on PRODUCE a feature film
from script to distribution on the screen
THINGS I’VE LEARNED
AS A MOVIEMAKER
- Today, what has affected both
audiences and modern cinema is the
language of commercials. These
films are successful, but they
don’t prove their existence in
time. Hollywood accepts them,
but if they don’t make enough
money, they sink. It’s because
they don’t build their own
language. - It’s not just about making a story
as dynamic as the producer wants
you to in order to keep the audience
seated for one-and-a-half to
two hours—which comes from
the old idea that Hollywood
defeated French cinema because
of explosions, timed every three
minutes in the movie, and
French cinema had too much
talking—which by the way is
true. - When I started making mov-
ies I believed that the marriage
between commercial and artistic cin-
ema was possible. This is because
I grew up on old-fashioned
Soviet cinema, great Czech
cinema, and great American
cinema of the ’70s. - We need to explore the central
nervous system that a hero in a film
exposes. Hollywood is avoiding
this—they don’t want to dive
into the substance of life and
political opinion. They’re now
creating politically correct cin-
ema. The generators of ideology
or power want cinema not to
be something that disturbs, but
rather for it to enact a sort of so-
cial harmony they want to see.
Moviemakers now accept the
language that is determined not
by the beat of your heart, but by
the perception of the audience,
who have been affected heavily
by the language of commercials. - We have to admit that
cinema was always a part of
mythology. Hollywood was a
generator of great idealism,
which was called the Ameri-
can Dream. The American
Dream does not exist—it is a
part of the utopia of the past.
Hollywood needs to find its
own approach to the fact that
we don’t have the American
Dream anymore. The Ameri-
can way of life is accepted
widely all over the world, but
the problem is that we have
to follow the values and un-
derstand how much we have
degraded values and how
much we have deeply stepped
in the shit, in order to not be
following reality, but instead
reacting to reality in the way
that we used to do in the best
manner.
- The problem today is you
don’t have superiority of author-
ship. Twenty years ago, when
somebody says Scorsese, you
understand all aspects of
cinema and human life that are
mixed in one person. When my
generation vanishes, you will
have some new revolutionary
authors who are going to take
the cinema into their hands. To-
day we have good films, but we
don’t have personalities who are
setting the tone of cinema. But
I hope this is not going to last
long until we get new ones—
until we get some wave of new
young American directors who
will give us another portion of
great American cinema from
the ’70s. - Like it or not, YouTube has
become one of the pieces of our
optical world. And this could be
negative for cinema or could be
positive, in a sense of develop-
ing a new vision of the world. - The problem in cinema is
when we speak about some
films, we speak about what
we’ve seen, but for what we’ve
seen to have consequences on our
thoughts? Only a master can create
this. MM
(CONTINUED FROM PG. 80)