Letter reSeArCH
c
0.51.01.52.0Lgr5hi : PanethDMSO
GW6471
CHIR990210.0090
0.019
0.42DMSOGW6471 5uMGW6471 5uM
+ Wnt3A 100ng/mlIsolation of
crypts4 days in culture
ENR + GW6471 +/- Wnt3A Viabilitya
0
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3Enriched in OLD
Paneth cellsEnriched in YOUNG
Paneth cellsPPARd -SIGNATURE
P-value = 0.042
0.1-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4Enriched in OLD Paneth cellsEnriched in YOUNG
Paneth cellsBIOCARTA PPARa PATHWAY
P-value = 0.0073
0.1
0b
....ATCCGGGACCAGTTCACAGGGCAAGA...d
Transcription
initiation sitePutative
PPAR
binding siteNotum gene (DECODE)Exon 12Stop
codonMouse PPARG;RXRA motif (ID: MA0065.2)Score: 9.61
Relative score: 0.833’UTRBinding motif analysis for PPRE (JASPAR)0.51.01.5Lgr5hi : Lgr5lo2.0DMSO
GW6471
CHIR990210.150.020
0.0110510152025% of epithelial cells
Lgr5hi
Lgr5loLgr5-EGFP
Side ScatterDMSOCHIR GW0.0260.04805101520% of epithelial cellsDMSOCHIR GWPaneth 0.0027
Entero-endocrineSide ScatterCD24DMSO
CHIR99021GW647102000400060008000Mean CD24 expression (a.u.)0.0021
0.023Extended Data Fig. 6 | Decreased PPAR activity in aged intestine.
a, GSEA analysis for ‘Biocarta PPARa’ and ‘PPARd’ gene sets (for statistics,
see ‘RNA sequencing and data processing’ in Methods). Nominal
P value is shown (n = 5 mice in old, n = 4 mice in young). b, Schematic
of the putative PPARα-binding site on the mouse and human NOTUM
genes found with DECODE. Mouse sequence shown. Bottom, score for the
discovered site using JASPAR matrix models for mouse PPAR-response
element (PPRE). PPARG; RXRA motif was used. c, FACS analysis
of cell populations in primary organoids treated for three days
with DMSO, CHIR99021 or GW6471 (n = 6 mice for DMSO, n = 5
mice for CHIR99021 and GW6471). Ratios of Lgr5hi to Paneth cells, and
Lgr5hi to Lgr5lo cells from the same analysis. Mean CD24 expression of
live Epcam+ cells are also shown. d, Representative images of mouse
intestinal organoids treated for 4 days with DMSO, 5 μM GW6471 or
5 μM GW6471 + 100 ng ml−^1 Wnt3A. Arrowheads indicate surviving,
and red asterisks collapsed, organoids. Scale bar, 100 μm. Experiment was
repeated four times with similar results. Unless otherwise indicated, data
are mean ± s.d.; two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test; exact P values shown
in corresponding panels.