The New York Times - USA - Arts & Leisure (2020-07-26)

(Antfer) #1
12 AR THE NEW YORK TIMES, SUNDAY, JULY 26, 2020

Pop


Both musicians and fans were blindsided by
the shutdown of concerts, and musicians
have been forced into an awkward public
learning curve. Finding themselves sud-
denly all alone, separated even from band-
mates, many discovered they had traded
sound-checked P.A. systems and flattering
stage lights for tinny laptop microphones
and the cramped rectangular screens of
smartphone cameras.
Palm-size rectangles are familiar spaces
for pop musicians promoting themselves
through Instagram. But those appearances
are usually casual, talky and short; they
briefly present the artist as something like a
regular person, trying to be relatable. If
smartphones and laptop screens are still
performance spaces, they are reductive
ones. Everyone looks taller onstage; every-
one looks smaller on a screen.
There was some charm, at first, in watch-
ing songs played from homey, unvarnished
settings, including the places where the
tunes had actually been written — so that’s
the guitar on that song! Look at that rare
synth! If listeners were lucky, the single-
camera shot also showed a high-quality mi-
crophone. Far too many livestreams are
still delivered through painfully lo-fi setups.
Home-alone livestreams have favored
self-contained solo acts who don’t depend
on theatricality or technological enhance-
ment: the jazz musician at the piano, the
country songwriter with an acoustic guitar,
the Broadway troupers who paid tribute to
Stephen Sondheim on his 90th birthday (of-
ten singing his stunningly complex songs to
equally complex prerecorded accompani-
ment). Electronic dance music D.J.s have
offered much better sound — they play re-
cordings — but they tend to look wonky and
diminished without club lighting and happy
dancers to pump up their beat.
For livestreamed concerts, mass popu-
larity has provided no advantage. Perform-
ers with small-scale careers, who are used
to playing coffeehouses or indie clubs, have
had to make fewer adjustments than musi-
cians who had moved up to bigger venues
and fancier productions. Quieter perform-
ers have adjusted much more gracefully
than histrionic ones.
Yet they all felt the absence of an in-per-
son audience. The lack of applause has rat-
tled musicians’ timing, completely disrupt-
ing what had been an instinctive feedback
loop. Many performers have responded by
getting downright chatty during their
streams, between and even during songs.
Therapists probably understand that reac-
tion to silence.
Other musicians are reading and re-
sponding to the busy scroll of online com-
ments; sometimes you can see their eyes
darting to their screens as they sing. Per-
haps musicians will develop new reflexes to
handle chat-window feedback as a substi-
tute for applause, while lucky fans may find
their favorites to be more immediately ac-
cessible. For now, when I watch an on-
screen performance alongside the scroll,
the chat reaction is quieter than being stuck
near a talkative audience member. But it’s
nearly as distracting.
If low-tech, livestreamed performance
has made anything clear, it’s this: Intimacy
is overrated. I hardly need to see any musi-
cian that closely. Yes, virtuosos can accom-
plish feats of physical dexterity and vocal
purity in real time; occasionally, a solo
close-up can be revelatory. Sometimes all
anyone needs to hear is a guitar and an
emotive voice. But as a fan, I don’t always
want to stay in the mundane work space
where a song originated. I also want to let

that song move me in all the other ways that
music can.
After all, art isn’t just the documentation
of a physical feat. Artists also construct
their own unreal worlds: strange, gorgeous,
eccentric, sometimes overwhelming illu-
sions. Musicians in the era of recording, am-
plification and synthesis concoct phan-
tasms in the studio and figure out how to
simulate them onstage, making music that
feels larger than life. Meanwhile, too many
livestreams are strictly earthbound.
Livestreaming only reminds us that artists
don’t have to be regular people.
For me, in the early weeks of the quaran-
tine, all those livestreams of lone perform-
ers at home added up to claustrophobia in-
stead of intimacy. The act of public perform-
ance, which once conveyed sharing and
emotional communion, projected isolation
and limitation instead. It’s no wonder so
many livestreams have been benefit shows
with long lists of performers playing a song
or two each — not only because countless
people and causes need help during this

economic collapse, but because homebound
musicians realize they can’t hold a viewer’s
attention the way they could on a stage.
Luckily for listeners, musicians online
have been stretching — and, frankly, cheat-
ing on — both the definition of a live per-
formance and social-distancing strictures.
Some have learned to treat the screen as a
stage allowing some artifice, even in real
time. It might be a plant-crammed home
setup, or a playfully changing video back-
drop, or a digital light show. At least it’s
more than a feed from a grainy smartphone
camera on a tripod.
As musicians settled into livestreaming,
physically separated bands started reunit-
ing, virtually and then in person. Digital re-
unions are usually cheats. Latency — the
delay between a live action and when it’s re-
ceived — barely affects an office meeting,
but it can be deadly to the subtle, split-sec-
ond interactions of musicians working to-
gether. So-called livestreams of physically
separated bands are likely to be feats of
editing: multiple tracks laid down as they

are in a recording studio.
The trickery may be obvious, as when
Kevin Parker presents himself multitrack-
ing instruments to become Tame Impala, or
Keith Urban suddenly multiplies himself in
a supposedly livestreamed performance.
Musicians may be bobbing their heads to
the same beat in the now-familiar video
grids, but that simulated Zoom meeting
isn’t actually happening; it’s a quiet tribute
to musicianship that those patiently assem-
bled, multitracked grids still find a groove.
The grids take the “live” out of livestream-
ing — face it, they’re music videos — but at
least there’s an image of cooperative effort:
one thing we used to take for granted at con-
certs.
Quarantine has also brought new for-
mats: the disc jockey D-Nice’s online dance
parties with chat scrolls full of A-list names;
the battle series Verzuz, concocted by the
producers Timbaland and Swizz Beatz, that
doubles as mutual-appreciation sessions.
Most have been streamed from isolation,
but on June 19 — Juneteenth — Alicia Keys
and John Legend shared a studio, playing
back to back at pink and black pianos. Social
distancing did not prevail; they hugged at
the end.
As stay-at-home guidelines have reced-
ed, musicians have been gathering in per-
son at nearly empty clubs, at recording stu-
dios and in outdoor spaces. When I watch, I
can’t help calculating how far apart the
players are standing, who’s masked and
who’s not, the number of cameras and
whether someone is carrying them, who set
up the equipment and who will be loading it
out. These venues, built for music, are
mostly empty, and presumably the few
workers on site take precautions. But there
is still no vaccine, and every close personal
encounter is a risk — particularly indoors,
particularly where breath is expended on
singing and playing instruments.
Hallowed music spaces like Ryman Audi-
torium in Nashville, Red Rocks Amphithe-
ater near Denver and Antone’s in Austin,
Texas, have opened their doors for
streamed benefit performances. In Boston,
Fenway Park opened the stadium to Drop-
kick Murphys — plenty of open space.
Jazz clubs — where on-the-spot musical
interaction is everything — have been de-
vising online survival strategies. The Vil-
lage Vanguard, the venerable Greenwich
Village basement club, has started weekly
livestreams of top-tier small groups that ob-
serve masking and social-distancing guide-
lines, with studio-quality miking and de-
tailed camera work that illuminates the mu-
sic. So have some concert halls, like the
Grand Ole Opry, with Saturday-night shows
on its ample stage.
The musicians are clearly happy to be
making music in the same room together,
even without an audience — enjoying, as
the pianist Vijay Iyer said before a spectac-
ular Village Vanguard set, “the fact that
we’re all in the room and the same air mole-
cules are vibrating.” Perhaps it’s not that
different from playing a rehearsal or a radio
appearance — except that the players have
been separated for so long, and their pleas-
ure in reuniting comes through. Solo inti-
macy may be overrated, but group proxim-
ity is not. Music-making simply isn’t the
same without it.
The internet may yet remake what dec-
ades, even centuries of concert traditions
have built up. Until there’s a vaccine, maybe
we can grow content with distant perform-
ers on flat screens, playing for us along with
the rest of a virtual audience. For now, it’s
still a work in progress.

LIVESTREAMING IN 2020

Livestreamed Intimacy Is Overrated


By JON PARELES


So many good intentions, so little joy. ¶ That’s the state of live music as it adjusts to the Covid-
pandemic. Social distancing tears apart the closeness that performers and listeners had always
taken for granted at concerts: closeness onstage, in the crowd and in the shared moment. These
early months have proved that musicians are eager to perform and that listeners still want the
singular bond with music that a concert provides. Instead, all we have is the indifferent internet.

OUT OF OFFICE

So much is lost
when audiences
can’t be physically
close to musicians
and chat-window
feedback replaces
cheers and
applause.

Last month, Alicia Keys, left, and John Legend
shared a studio for a Juneteenth performance
on the battle series Verzuz.

Some livestreamed concerts emulate the
one-time-only experience of live shows —
they’re webcast just once in real time, then
disappear from the web. Others recognize
that anything that’s digitized can be re-
corded and replayed. Here, alphabetically,
are 10 of the best virtual concerts that have
stayed online, picked by Jon Pareles.
AFRO-LATIN JAZZ ORCHESTRA
VIRTUAL BIRDLAND
Arturo O’Farrill’s Afro-Latin Jazz Orchestra,
a big band dedicated to the fusion in its
name, has turned its weekly Sunday-night
slot at Birdland into virtual sets that hold
supercharged mambos alongside far-reach-
ing jazz excursions. The June 14 edition
features Rudresh Mahanthappa with break-
neck alto saxophone solos in “The Afro-
Cuban Jazz Suite” composed by Arturo’s
father, Chico O’Farrill.
AVENTURA
BUD LIGHT SELTZER SESSIONS
The corporate sponsorship is overbearing,
but it paid for a close-up, “MTV Unplugged”-
style studio session for Aventura, the New
York City band that turned Dominican
bachata into best-selling pop.
ERYKAH BADU
QUARANTINE: APOCALYPSE 3
Erykah Badu started off charging just $
admission to her increasingly ambitious
series of livestreamed shows; this one has
lingered online. “Apocalypse 3” was a surre-
al soundstage production — costumes,
lights, musicians in separate plastic bubbles
— that expanded on her 2015 mixtape, “But
You Caint Use My Phone,” vamping on
technology, communication and connection.
JASON ISBELL AND AMANDA SHIRES
LIVE AT BROOKLYN BOWL NASHVILLE
Jason Isbell celebrated the release date of
his new album, “Reunions,” by performing
its songs in a livestream from the near-
empty Brooklyn Bowl in Nashville, joined by
his wife, Amanda Shires, on fiddle and
harmony vocals. The songs are moody
character studies with philosophical under-
currents; the banter in between was loose
and free-associative.
GUNNA
WUNNA LIVE IN L.A.
Gunna staged “Wunna Live in LA” on the
terrace of a big white Los Angeles mansion,
with a live band — some masked — punch-
ing up his recorded tracks. His career cata-
lyst, Young Thug, makes a guest appear-
ance. The songs boast of material and sexu-
al triumphs, but they’re delivered as minor-
mode incantations, turning almost hypnotic.
NORAH JONES
MINI CONCERT (LIVE FROM HOME 6-18-
2020)
Norah Jones has been doing bare-bones
livestreams a few times a week during the
pandemic: just her and her upright piano
(or occasionally a guitar), playing to a cam-
era that she occasionally glances at. The
songs in this 21-minute set — hers and one
by Cut Worms — contemplate love, tran-
scendence and loss with troubled grace.
JORMA KAUKONEN
QUARANTINE CONCERT NO. 5
Jorma Kaukonen — a guitarist and singer in
Hot Tuna and, in the 1960s, in Jefferson
Airplane — has his own 200-seat theater,
from which concerts had been livestreamed
long before the lockdown. Since the pan-
demic hit, Kaukonen has been playing
mostly solo weekly concerts from its cozy
stage, working through a lifelong repertoire
that spans ragtime and psychedelia and
garrulously answering fan questions deliv-
ered by his wife, Vanessa.
NDUDUZO MAKHATHINI
MODES OF COMMUNICATION: #STAYHOME-
SESSIONS WITH NDUDUZO MAKHATHINI
The South African pianist Nduduzo
Makhathini merges the modal propulsion of
McCoy Tyner with kindly, straightforward
melodies that lead into quasi-mystical medi-
tations and explosive sprints. His home-
made livestream — he plays upright piano
and is joined by his wife, the singer
Omagugu Makhathini — is a mini-manifesto
of hope, determination and gratitude.
DANIELA MERCURY
LIVE DA RAINHA
Daniela Mercury, a Brazilian superstar who
performed for hundreds of thousands on
New Year’s Eve 2010 in Rio de Janeiro,
struts and sambas as if she’s on a much
larger stage, with her masked band behind
her on what looks like a patio and her chil-
dren showing up as Carnival revelers.
POST MALONE
NIRVANA TRIBUTE
Post Malone’s tribute to Nirvana — a benefit
for the World Health Organization that was
apparently shot in a rec room with a well-
stocked bar — was heartfelt and loud, not to
mention one of the few real-time
livestreams that could handle the sonic
demands of electric guitars. Travis Barker
commanded the drums, and Post Malone,
true to Nirvana aesthetics, wore a dress.

These Concerts


Don’t Just Vanish
Some virtual shows
are not one time only.
Free download pdf