Barron's - USA (2020-08-03)

(Antfer) #1

28 BARRON’S August 3, 2020


FUNDS


Year to date, 90 of 129 thematic ETFs beat the


S&P 500, returning 17% on average; 48 of them


outran thebest-performing sector, technology.


Diversification Works,


ButSoDoThese


Niche, Thematic ETFs


I


nvestors are often told that


the golden rule of investing


is diversification. Sometimes,


though, it pays to make a tar-


geted bet. That has been the


driving force behind thematic


exchange-traded funds: These


niche funds grew three times as fast


as the rest of the ETF industry in the


second quarter.


Thematic ETFs typically focus on


long-term, societal trends, such as dis-


ruptive technologies, climate change,


or shifting consumer behaviors. Some


of the most popular themes include


cloud computing, robotics, and electric


vehicles, as well as the gig economy,


e-commerce, and clean energy.


These are hot topics, for sure. And


they’re hot stocks: Year to date, 89 out


of the 129 thematic ETFs on the market


beat the S&P 500 index, returning 17%


on average; 47 of them even outran the


best-performing sector, technology.


Thanks to both strong inflows and


market-beating performance, thematic


ETFs saw their assets increase 65% in


the second quarter, more than three


times the broader ETF industry’s 19%


growth, according to data from Global


X, which offers 20 thematic ETFs. Five


years ago, there were just 40 thematic


ETFs with $5 billion in assets. Today,


there’s $41 billion in these ETFs.


The Covid-19 pandemic, mean-


while, has disrupted how people live


and how companies are run—possibly


forever. More than ever, investors


have become aware that the future


might look very different from today,


says Matthew Bartolini, State Street’s


head of SPDR Americas research, and


they are interested in the companies


that could be the biggest beneficiaries.


“This acceleration is likely to remain


very sticky beyond Covid-19,” says Jay


Jacob, head of research and strategy


for Global X.


For a theme to be investible, there


must also be a large enough address-


able market, and sufficient companies


with products and services to address


that market. Some industries, while


promising, are still too nascent. True-


Mark Investments, a new ETF firm


founded just a year ago, closely moni-


tors venture capital and private equity


to identify emerging public companies


for its $12 millionTrueShares Tech-


nology, AI & Deep LearningETF


(ticker: LRNZ).


Despite thematic ETFs’ impressive


returns, investors should proceed


with caution. Most of these ETFs are


quite small; More than half of the 129


funds have less than $100 million in


assets, though a dozen have crossed


the $1 billion mark. Most are also


fairly new; just 16 funds have a 10-


year track record, mostly in clean en-


ergy and natural resources; 75 haven’t


been open for three years. They’re also


a bit more complicated to build, since


they’re either actively managed or


track a customized index—and that


means they can be more costly. The


average expense ratio for this group is


1.05%, while the broader ETF indus-


try charges just 0.67%.


Two of the largest thematic ETFs,


the $6.1 billionARK Innovation


(ARKK) and $4.7 billionFirst Trust


Cloud Computing(SKYY), have


returned 61% and 29%, respectively,


year to date, beating the $32 billion


Technology Select Sector SPDR


(XLK)’s 18% return. The $1.6 billion


ARK Genomic Revolution(ARKG)


is the largest thematic ETF focused on


health-care innovation; it has returned


63% year to date, ahead of the $24


billionHealth Care Select Sector


SPDR(XLV)’s 5% return.


Thematic ETFs don’t perform like


their sector’s ETFs because they are


actually quite different. Most the-


matic ETFs have very little overlap


with traditional sector funds. They


usually have fewer stocks, and tend


to own more small and international


stocks—sometimes across multiple


sectors. The 39 holdings in ARK In-


novation, for instance, have an aver-


age market cap of $8.4 billion,


whereas the technology SPDR, with


72 stocks, has an average market cap


of $339 billion. The ARK fund also


has 13% in international stocks, and


the SPDR, virtually zero. Only two of


the ARK fund’s holdings—Xilinx


(XLNX) andAutodesk(ADSK)—


also belong to the SPDR tech ETF,


and due to their smaller size, they


account for only 1% of the SPDR


tech. Similarly, only three out of the


39 stocks that the ARK Genomic Rev-


olution holds are also in the health-


care SPDR, making up just 4% of the


latter’s portfolio.


B


ecause thematic ETFs are so


specific, even those with


similar names can turn out


to have little in common. The


same theme can be interpreted differ-


ently, and various methods—from


fundamental to quantitative—are


used to select and weigh stocks.


Investors who still want some di-


versification might be better served


with equal-weighted funds, especially


those with a higher number of hold-


ings. The $2.4 billioniShares Expo-


nential Technologies(XT) and the


$1 billionSPDR Kensho New Econ-


omies Composite(KOMP), for in-


stance, have about 200 and 400 hold-


ings, respectively, and both are largely


equal-weighted, with minor modifica-


tions. “This is really about delivering


thematic beta,” says Jeff Spiegel, head


of iShares megatrend and interna-


tional ETFs at BlackRock, “It’s not


about having a view that one particu-


lar company will be the winner of the


theme. It’s much more about getting


exposure to a range of firms.”


Many thematic ETFs are more


concentrated, however. These can be


more pure plays, but only as a supple-


ment to an otherwise well-diversified


portfolio. Ark Financial’s and Global


X’s ETFs, for instance, have fewer


holdings, often less than 50, and the


weighting depends on either active


managers’ conviction or how well the


stocks have been performing. “The-


matic investing, if done right, should


be more concentrated,” says Global X’s


Jacob, “You own the companies that


are best positioned to benefit from the


materialization of a trend.”B


By Evie Liu


Leading Themes


Thematic ETFs typically focus on the hottest trends—and stocks. Their returns are impressive, but proceed with caution.


Fund / Ticker Expense Ratio AUM ($mil) YTD Return 3-Yr Return*


ARK Next Generation Internet / ARKW 0.75% 1,914 69.8% 44.9%


ProShares Online Retail / ONLN 0.58 234 65.9 N/A


Genomic Revolution / ARKG 0.75 1,617 62.9 38.6


WisdomTree Cloud Computing / WCLD 0.45 644 62.0 N/A


Amplify Online Retail / IBUY 0.65 755 61.3 31.1


ARK Innovation / ARKK 0.75 6,137 60.6 41.5


O’Shares Global Internet Giants / OGIG 0.48 356 54.6 N/A


Fintech Innovation / ARKF 0.75 330 48.2 N/A


Video Gaming and eSports / ESPO 0.99 367 47.3 N/A


Global X Video Games & Esports / HERO 0.50 161 47.1 N/A


Note: Data as of July 30 , 2020 ;* annualized;N/A means the funds are launched less than threeyears ago. Sources: Global X,Morningstar
Free download pdf