Times 2 - UK (2020-08-05)

(Antfer) #1

6 1GT Wednesday August 5 2020 | the times


fashion


You’ll see me in a


shirtdress by the pool


Throw it over a swimsuit and


you’re done, says Anna Murphy


H


ere’s the dress to
make you realise there are
shirtdresses and there are
shirtdresses. A more
definitively shirt-like dress
is not to be found. Indeed, this one is
arguably more shirt than anything else
(£69, arket.com).
I can’t think of a better poolside
cover-up, should I actually make it
poolside this summer, which is,
needless to say, a watching brief.
I find the boho approach doesn’t
work for me. To be honest I think
it’s tricky for most Brits to pull off
unless you are very young, very brown
and very thin. Even then I think it’s
best saved for Mykonos.
I need crisper lines and, if a piece
is unwaisted, I look better with a
V-neckline, which is, in essence,
what an undone shirt collar delivers.
Were I to wear this number anywhere
away from the pool, I would sling
on a belt. For a hot summer’s day
I like Catherine Prevost’s pom-pom
corded style, the cord and tassels
blue, the pom-poms in cheerily
contrasting green and orange
(reduced to £45 from £95,
catherineprevost.com).
Why the belt? Because, again,
I have worked out what works best
for my shape. As someone with,
comparatively speaking, big shoulders
and hips, and an approximation of
a waist — the combination of the
so-called triangle and inverted
triangle body shapes — I tend to
look better signalling said waist.
That’s right, it’s always — always —
worth factoring in your body type.
A piece that is straight-up-and-
down like this works well, no
surprise, on those of us who are
straight up and down, the so-called
column body shape. Hourglasses
and triangles, either inverted or
not, look better with some
delineation at the midriff.
Rectangles and roundeds, the
two final categories, would,
according to the expert
bodymapper and personal
stylist Anna Berkeley, “be more
flattered by an A-line number
which is fitted to the bust but
skims what lies below it”.
Getting to know what does or
doesn’t work for your body —
not to mention your face
shape — is the ultimate
game changer when it
comes to dressing your
best self.
What I am also
looking for more than
ever is to invest in
clothes that are
multifarious. I have
grown to love
wearing the more
mannish variety of
shirtdress belted and
layered over jeans or summer
trousers. (The Mimi white linen harem
pants from the boutique British
brand Nrby Clothing tick the
latter box perfectly, £110,
nrbyclothing.com.) I also

I love


wearing


this


type of


shirtdress


as a


cover-up


like it worn open over a top. Now, after
the success of this week’s bodysuit-
related adventure (see right), I have
another option. After all, this is a
version of what I often do by the pool.
Swimsuit plus shirtdress. Job done.

Pimp your mask
I am not going to claim that the idea
of a chain for your mask isn’t, at first
pass, a bit weird. But at second pass it
seems to me rather sensible. Besides,
let’s face it, the whole mask-related
kerfuffle was weird until very recently.
Yet, only this week, going in and out
of assorted shops over the course of a
day, I kept forgetting to take mine off.
Anyway, the canny specialist brand
Sunny Cords has clocked that its
pretty sunglasses chains can work just
as well on your mask. (You put each
elastic strap on your mask into the
rubber loop at either end of the
chain, and then tighten the loop.
It’s straightforward, but there’s an
instruction video on the website
just in case.)
I like the Bead It style, which
comes with a silver-plated chain,
and beige, light or dark blue beads,
and the McTassel, which has a cord
and tassel of cotton plus gold-plated
heart and beads, and is available in a
range of neutrals and brights (both
£29, sunny-cords.com). At another
level are the semi-precious iterations,
such as the lapis lazuli or rainbow
tourmaline takes (£92).
All of the above can, of course —
as per their original conception —
be worn with your sunglasses too
Perhaps, here’s hoping, by a pool.

Smize, though your heart is aching
In a supermarket the other day I
found myself smiling at a woman
stacking shelves. For no particular
reason. Just because I think smiling
at people is generally a good thing.
Then I realised that, thanks to my
mask, as far as she was concerned,
I could simply be staring at her.
“I am smiling at you, in case you
are wondering,” I said.
“Yes,” she said, laughing. “I can tell
from your eyes that you are smizing.”
Ha! A whole new application for the
term made famous by Tyra Banks on
America’s Next Top Model. We all need
to learn to smile with our eyes now.

Eyebrow-raising technology
We also need to get our eyebrows on
point. I can’t claim it was due to any
prescience on my part that in early
March I started using Revitabrow
(£70, revitalash.co.uk). However, I
am jolly pleased I did. It was a friend
who recommended it to me for
fuller-looking brows. Even so, I
embarked on the project with
a scepticism untempered by the
talk of “high-impact proprietary
technology” on the brand’s
website. All I can say is it
works. Just don’t ask me how.
Instagram: @annagmurphy

£29,
sunny-cords.com

oonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn


£69,
arket.com

they avoid the issues that can come
with a form-fitting top, “like riding
up, or ripples at the waist”. Unless, of
course, those ripples are one’s own.
Mugler offers low leg-cut bodysuits
too, but its, and Lipa’s, off-duty
showgirl influence can be felt
elsewhere. There are real-world
examples on the Zara website, for
example, such as the khaki trouser suit
given a frisson of kink courtesy of a
black ribbed iteration almost as leggy
— or to be more precise, hip-boney —
as Lipa’s (£12.99, zara.com). “This is
not a place you are supposed to show
skin,” Cadwallader says, “so when you
flash it, it’s pretty bold.”
In essence this is another variety of
the so-called keyholing trend that has
been around for a while, another mode
of revealing a section of flesh in a way
that, its advocates believe, looks
modern-sexy, not (and this is all too
easy a trap into which to fall) dated-
sexy. And, no, I have no idea what
particular physical jerks render that
part of one’s anatomy fit for public
viewing either. I suspect you’ve either
got it — aka Lipa — or you haven’t.
I remember when leotards — sorry,
bodysuits — left the balance beam in
the late 1980s. Here was a piece, a
slightly peculiar piece, in the new
sartorial jigsaw that was power
dressing. Power dressing: what a heady
phrase, and alluring phenomenon, to
what was then the adolescent and
distinctly unpowerfully dressed moi.
From what I could work out at the

The body is


It’s a T-shirt, it’s also a leotard, and this


time it won’t hurt, says Anna Murphy


I


t’s indicative of why this is a
fashion moment that I am
struggling with that I am even a
tad shaky on the terminology.
When I, along with 49.5 million
other people, saw Dua Lipa post
a selfie recently in a daytime
ensemble that encompassed
tailored trousers and a top that
evidently wasn’t, in fact, a top,
I thought: “Gosh. Dua Lipa is
wearing a leotard.” Then I checked
myself. “Gosh. Dua Lipa is wearing
a bodysuit.”
This was not merely an educated
guess, which was what used to be
required when bodysuits originally
made it out of the gym. Back then all
you had to go on as an observer was
the preternatural sleekness of fit and
that there was no riding up; no gaps.
That Lipa’s white Mugler number
was a bodysuit was indisputable.
Make that in-your-face. It had such
a high-cut leg that two curves of bare
flesh were revealed above her trouser
waistband. Punchy.
This — for those who dare — is
the 2020 bodysuit retool. Needless
to say, it’s out on manoeuvres on the
social media accounts of countless
influencers, often in more Mugler. The
label sent 13 bodysuit-encompassing
looks down the catwalk for
this season. Its designer, Casey
Cadwallader, explains his dedication
to the genre by way of “the physics of
fit. Bodysuits eliminate any bulk and
create sleekness.” Plus, he continues,
Free download pdf