Bloomberg Businessweek - USA (2020-10-12)

(Antfer) #1
◼ POLITICS Bloomberg Businessweek October 12, 2020

36


ILLUSTRATION BY KATI SZILÁGYI.

DATA:

BLUE

DOG

COALITION

yearhopingtoraisingmorethan$1million
byElectionDay.It reachedthatgoallastmonth,
accordingtoKevinPrice,vicepresidentofgovern-
mentaffairsatAmericanCrystalSugarCo.
Thedistrictis thebiggestsugarbeetproducer
intheU.S.“Collinissugar,andsugarisCollin,”
Pricesays.KellyErickson,a farmerandchairof
theCSRCsteeringcommittee,sayslosingPeterson
asagriculturechairmanwouldbea blow.“You
havethechairman ofHouseAgriculture,and
youknowwhatkindofpowerthatyields,not
onlyforagricultureinthe7thDistrictbutagri-
cultureallovertheU.S.,”hesays.“Fischbach
wouldbea freshmanandsittinginthebackof
theroom.Howmuchgooddoyouthinkshecould
doforagriculture?”
SupportersofPetersonalsopointtohiscentrist
politics,abilitytoworkwithRepublicans,andsuc-
cessinsecuringfundingforruralhospitals.“Heis
practical.Heis tough.Heunderstandshisdistrict
extremelywell,’’saysTomVilsack,formeragricul-
turesecretaryunderPresidentObama.
Republicanscontendit’stime“tobringina
differentperspective,”inthewordsofMinnesota

● A proposaltorestrictthecourt’sauthority
overcertainlawsstirsinterestontheleft

PacktheSupremeCourt,


OrStripItsPowers?


hasmigratedfromtheRighttotheLeft,withan
arrayofreformsunderdiscussion,includingjuris-
dictionstripping.
Facingtheprospectofa 6-3conservativemajor-
ityonthehighcourtfollowingthedeathofJustice
RuthBader Ginsburg, progressivelawmakers
andleft-wingactivistsarecallingforDemocrats
toimposetermlimitsorexpandthesizeofthe
SupremeCourtandpackit withliberaljustices.On
Sept.29,HouseDemocratsintroduceda billpro-
posing18-yeartermlimitsfornewjustices.And
thoughPresidentFranklinD.Rooseveltfamously
failedinhisefforttopackthecourtin1937,schol-
arsgenerallyconsidercourtexpansiontobelegal
becausetheConstitutiondoesn’tspecifythenum-
berofjustices.
But those aren’t the only reforms under consid-
eration. A handful of academics and liberal think-
ers are arguing for drastic structural changes that
would strip power away from the judiciary, embrac-
ing the approach conservatives championed in the
1980s. In recent weeks professors at top-tier law

THEBOTTOMLINE MinnesotaRepresentativeCollinPeterson,
a conservativeDemocratin a heavilyRepublicandistrict,is
dependingonfarmers’supporttokeephisseatonNov.3.

state lawmaker Tim Miller, a U.S. House candidate
in 2018. Voters, he says, “don’t want someone who
is going to come in and be a radical change, and
that’s why I think Fischbach is a really good fit.”
If Peterson loses, it will be another member
down for congressional Democrats’ Blue Dog
Coalition, which he helped found in the 1990s.
The caucus had more than 54 members in 2009
but was decimated in the 2010 and 2012 elections.
It rebounded in 2016 and 2018, and membership
now stands at 26. The Blue Dogs’ strong  2018
results alongside the emergence of Ocasio-Cortez’s
progressive “squad” shows the ideological split
within the Democratic Party.
Peterson says his campaign is doing what it’s
always done. If he’s reelected, he will immediately
be busy with work on the 2023 farm bill. “They
are spending a lot more money than I have, and
they did that in 2014, too,” he says of Republicans.
“We’ll just see what happens.” �Kim Chipman
and Derek Wallbank

In 1982 a young lawyer at the U.S. Department
of Justice wrote a series of memos defending an
unorthodox proposal to limit the power of the
Supreme Court. It was nine years after the court’s
landmark Roe v. Wade decision, which granted
women a constitutional right to abortion, and
Republicans in Congress had recently introduced
more than 20 bills seeking to divest the court of
its authority over abortion and other contentious
social issues, including desegregation and school
prayer. Academics have a term for this kind of leg-
islation: jurisdiction stripping.
Noneofthosebillspassed.ButtheDOJmemos
offered a sophisticatedlegaldefenseofjuris-
diction stripping, arguing that “clear and unequiv-
ocal language” in Article 3 of the Constitution gives
Congress the authority to shield certain laws from
Supreme Court review.
The author of the memos was John Roberts.
Forty years later, Roberts is the Supreme Court’s
chief justice and the leading defender of its institu-
tional legitimacy, and the push for judicial reform

“It’s almost a
certainty of
any Supreme
Court reform
that we would
be inviting the
Supreme Court
to push back”

▼ Membership of the
BlueDogCoalition
50

25

0
1995 2019
Free download pdf