the times | Saturday October 17 2020 2GM 37
News
A young barrister who broke a hotel
receptionist’s jaw with a hockey stick
has avoided being disbarred after it was
judged that he had “put his life in order”.
Felix Evans, 29, was told by a disci-
plinary tribunal that he would be fined
£2,000 and have to pay legal costs but
that he could practise at the Bar after a
three-year suspension despite the trial
judge having forecast that his career
was “utterly lost”.
Evans pleaded guilty two years ago to
causing grievous bodily harm after
prosecutors said that he struck his
“hapless” victim three times during the
assault.
The attack occurred in 2017 when
Evans was staying at a hotel after
playing hockey. He had been drinking
heavily with a friend. A ruling by
company, Petfre, based in Gibraltar, for
£2 million, which includes the interest
he would have earned from the win.
He said the past 2½ years had felt “like
hell... Hopefully the judge will accept
the arguments put forward by my legal
team.” Mr Green is in ill health and has
suffered a heart attack since the dispute.
Betfred points to 49 pages of terms
and conditions which Mr Green agreed
to when he signed up, including a clause
that all “pays and plays” would be void
in the event of a “malfunction”.
Mr Green’s solicitor, Peter Coyle, said
that Betfred had failed to prove there
was a software problem.
A Betfred spokesman said: “The case
is progressing at court and it is inappro-
priate for us to comment further.”
Gambler denied £1.7m
jackpot goes to court
Andrew Ellson
Consumer Affairs Correspondent
Barrister in assault by hockey stick
the Bar Tribunals and Adjudication
Service described the assault as
“particularly egregious”. It said that
Evans “hit the hotel receptionist with a
hockey stick three times: once in the
face, breaking his jaw, and twice on his
back”.
It went on to note that Evans told the
police after being arrested: “I’m very
guilty for what I did. I’m upset I harmed
him and shaken by what I’ve done. I
regret it.”
Suspending him from the Bar for
three years and fining him £2,000, the
panel said that ordinarily a criminal
conviction of this sort would result
in him being struck off. “Were it not
for the efforts [he] has made to put
his life in order we would not have
hesitated to disbar him,” the panel said.
“However, we do consider all that
he has done since the incident to
repair his life to amount to exceptional
circumstances.”
The trial judge said that Evans had
high academic achievements but that
his behaviour had been completely
unforgivable and that he should be
“thoroughly ashamed of himself”.
Evans was called to the Bar in 2014 at
Inner Temple. However, he is described
as an “unregistered” barrister because
he has not completed pupillage and
therefore is not yet entitled to practise.
The five-strong panel accepted that
Evans, a married father of one, had
attempted to redeem himself. He had
acknowledged that he was an alcoholic
and had attended counselling.
The Solicitors Regulation Authority
has allowed Evans to qualify into that
branch of the legal profession and the
tribunal noted that the firm employing
him was aware of his conviction.
Jonathan Ames Legal Editor
A father who was denied a £1.7 million
payout by Betfred is taking his case to
the High Court.
Andy Green, 53, from Lincolnshire,
claims that he hit the jackpot in 2018
playing a game on his phone. He spent
£2,500 celebrating but a Betfred direct-
or called him to say that there had been
a “software error” and it was rejecting
the claim. As a “goodwill” gesture the
company offered him £30,000 if the
father of two signed a confidentiality
agreement. When he refused Betfred
increased its offer to £60,000, which he
also rejected. He is heading to the High
Court to sue Betfred and its parent
future where no farmer goes in their
field, but I do want to see technology to
help them to do their job better,” he said.
A Southampton-based start-up,
Small Robot Company, has three types
of robots they lease out to 32 farms
across the UK. Called Tom, Dick and
Harry, they “seed, feed and weed” crops
autonomously for clients including
Waitrose and the National Trust. Their
biggest robot, Dick, which is shaped like
a spider and can grow in size according
to the crop size, zaps weeds with electri-
city rather than chemicals. The robots
rely on an artificial intelligence system
called Wilma that studies images
scanned by the robot Tom to work out
what help crops may need.
Dogtooth Technologies, a start-up
company near Cambridge, has devel-
oped autonomous robots to drive along
crop rows and assess whether each
Rise of robots down on the farm
From driverless tractors
to health monitors for
cows, technology is fast
changing agriculture,
writes Tom Knowles
Tom, Dick
and Harry
The largest of a fleet of
three robots, Dick zaps
weeds with electricity,
burning away the whole
root, rather than relying
on chemical sprays
Dogtooth
Technologies
The robot’s cameras scan
soft fruit to judge when
they are ready to be picked.
It checks for defects then
pops the strawberries
in punnets
strawberry is ready
to be picked.
Even after har-
vest, robots are in-
volved. The start-
up Crover has
produced a robot
that can “swim”
through bulk sol-
ids, such as cereals
and grains, moni-
toring their con-
dition in storage,
checking every
grain.
Innovation is
also coming to
livestock farm-
ing. David
Christensen, a farmer at Kingston Hill
Farm in Abingdon near Oxford, has
installed a monitor system called Cow
Manager for his 900-strong dairy herd.
A monitor, an ear tag with an inbuilt
accelerometer, can tell his team how
much the cow is walking, lying down,
eating and whether it has a tempera-
ture. Mr Christensen said: “It might say
she’s not eating too much, she’s lying
down for longer or she’s not ruminating
as much. It will say, you might just want
to have a look at cow 523, because she
has exhibited differ-
ent behaviour
from the previ-
ous seven
days.”
However,
David Rose, a
professor in
agricultural
innovation at
Reading Uni-
versity, said the
sector would
need to be careful
it does not simply
bring new stress-
es. “A farmer now
has a computer
spitting out so
much data on each
individual cow that
he has to sift
through it and learn new skills to try
and repurpose it. So actually it’s not
freed his time and it’s a different type of
stress,” he said.
“Instead of blind optimism, we need
to identify where benefits and dis-
advantages of new agricultural techno-
logy will occur and for whom.”
tKingstonHill
fr
o
d
D
p
a
in
R
v
se
n
it
b
e
h
sp
m
in
h
hitandlear
Agri-tech machines are helping to
seed, feed and weed crops — and even
pick strawberries. David Christensen’s
cows have monitors to tell him if they
are falling ill
To your right, an unmanned tractor
trundles intelligently by. On your left is
a herd of cattle wearing Fitbit-style
monitors. Above, a swarm of drones is
analysing your crops from the air.
This may be your field but there is no
real need for you to be there. It is a farm
of the future. Experts believe that with-
in a few years it could be a reality.
With the industry facing issues in-
cluding an ageing workforce, environ-
mental regulations on pesticides and
Covid-19, start-ups are seeking big
yields from “agri-tech”. The burgeoning
sector received an estimated $2.8 bil-
lion of investment worldwide last year.
Even the world’s largest tech giants
are seeing an opportunity. This week
Google announced the launch of an
agricultural unit called Mineral that
includes self-driving robot buggies that
monitor the health of individual plants.
“Farming is going to go through a
revolution, for sure,” Fraser Black, chief
executive of a British agri-tech centre,
Crop Health and Protection, said.
“We’re talking about Agriculture 4.0.
You’ve still got the classic farming
family for generations but now you're
also getting new entrepreneurs coming
in who are not farmers and know how
to use the technology differently and
the two are coming together.”
Kit Franklin, a lecturer in agricultur-
al engineering at Harper Adams Uni-
versity, helped to lead a project called
“hands-free hectare” in which a team
successfully planted, grew and harvest-
ed spring barley and winter wheat with-
out stepping on to the land. Instead
they relied on self-driving tractors and
combine harvesters, drones and a
ground-roving robot looking at weeds.
“My belief is in five years’ time it will
be unsurprising to see an autonomous
tractor,” Mr Franklin said. His team is
now using autonomous machines
across five fields, but with human inter-
action as well. “I don’t want to see a
How The Times
reported on the
launch of Mineral
on Wednesday