Walkout at riot
Employees at the League of Legends creator protest forced arbitration
binding. Since the original Kotaku
report, Riot has taken measures to
combat sexism, including hiring chief
diversity officer Angela Roseboro.
However the plaintiffs allege that the
everyday atmosphere at Riot hasn’t
improved – they described being
required to take on additional roles
without remuneration and enduring
sexual objectification, which includes
email chains rating female Riot
employees. Additionally the lawsuits
detail discriminating hiring
procedures and a gender pay gap.
To some of the protesting
employees, refusing to settle these
issues in court goes against Riot’s
commitment to prevent
F
ollowing a report by
Kotaku on the endemic
sexism at Riot Games
last August, the
company announced
actions to improve its culture.
Several months later a number of
Riot employees filed lawsuits
against their employer for gender
discrimination. Riot responded by
pointing out its mandatory
arbitration clause, effectively
blocking court proceedings.
Over 150 employees left their
workplace both to protest forced
arbitration, a practice in which a
private arbitrator settles disputes
instead of a court judge, and the
ongoing problems at Riot. Arbitration
differs from court procedures in that
they’re confidential and parties
choose arbitrators themselves, which
means they’re not necessarily
impartial. Most importantly,
arbitration rulings aren’t legally
plaintiffs allege
thattheeveryday
atmosphereatriot
hasn’t improved
MonIToR
NewS | OpiNiON | DevelOpmeNt