The Times - UK (2020-10-20)

(Antfer) #1

28 1GM Tuesday October 20 2020 | the times


Comment


I’ll move all


my cl o cks


sideways


this weekend


I


n the traditional 8.54am slanging
match on Radio 4’s Toda y
programme between two people
who pretend to have strong
opinions about something

nobody else cares about, so that we


can all throw coffee down our necks


and toast into our children as we


hustle out of the door to the sound


of somebody other than the people


we love being vile to each other, two


men went at it hammer and tongs


yesterday over the putting forward of


the clocks. Or the putting back.


Whichever it is that we are meant


to do next Sunday. Or Saturday.


Or Monday.


On one side of the debate was a


man from an organisation that was


violently in favour of whichever it is


we are about to do. Or possibly


against it. And on the other side,


whichever side that was, was Peter


Hitchens of The Mail on Sunday, as


usual, whose position was that his


Rapid tests are the


only way to break


the virus impasse


Matthew Lesh


B


ritain is stuck in Covid
purgatory. If we do nothing,
tens of thousands could die.

If we continue with
lockdowns, livelihoods and
liberties will be destroyed.
NHS Test and Trace, costing a
whopping £12 billion, was meant to
solve this dilemma. It has been a
colossal failure. The government
never learnt from its earlier mistakes,
maintaining a highly centralised
approach that shuns outsiders.
The testing regime is largely
dependent on PCR (polymerase
chain reaction) tests. These are
highly accurate but slow, expensive
and logistically challenging. The
government has also bought kit from
Oxford Nanopore and DnaNudge —
tests are faster but rely on expensive
proprietary technology and machines.

What we need are cheap and rapid
tests that we can take every day, half
an hour before catching a plane, or
entering a restaurant, theatre or club.
This would allow the prompt
discovery of contagious cases before
they can spread. Life could largely
return to normal even before (or
without) a vaccine.
Thankfully, this technology exists.
We just aren’t using it. RT-Lamp
(Reverse Transcription Loop-
mediated Isothermal Amplification)
can detect the virus using a rapid
and cheap one-step process. It
proved effective in tackling Ebola
in Africa. Lamp tests mean spitting
in a tube (or taking a swab and
dipping it in a tube), placing the tube

in a heat block for 15-30 minutes,
and seeing whether it changes
colour.
Unlike a PCR test it does not
require advanced machinery at a
laboratory. We could do rapid Lamp
tests at GP surgeries, pharmacies,
airports, railway stations and sports
stadiums. Open-source test designs
have been verified by leading
universities and research institutes,
including Oxford University and the
Francis Crick Institute in London.
There are also new “antigen” tests,
run via a paper strip like a pregnancy
test, which have been approved by
US regulators and have a CE mark
for hospitals or GPs. These tests cost
about £5-£10 a pop. They still need

approval for use at home.
Regulators may be wary because
LAMP (90%-97% +) and antigen
tests (84%-98%) are not as sensitive
as PCR tests (95%-100%), meaning
that there will be some false
negatives (and probably fewer false
positives). Incumbent diagnostic
companies will also express doubt
since profit margins are thin.
But millions of rapid tests that can
identify most cases and limit the
spread would be better than our
present system: one that is too
inaccessible, expensive and slow to
provide much practical use.

Matthew Lesh is head of research at
the Adam Smith Institute

Fanaticism will thrive until the West properly upholds its values and supports Muslim reformers


Macron’s war against Islamism is not enough


would expect to see New Labour’s
swivel-eyed hobgoblin-in-chief
canoodling with his bezzies of an
evening. I hope Blair was in breach
of the regs, I hope he’s got it, and I
hope he gave it to every man jack of
them. (Although — to be clear — I
hope nobody dies and, should my
powers of voodoo prove more
efficacious than I was expecting, I
exclude the staff from my fantasy).

Neighbourhood botch


V


olunteers are to be issued with
speed cameras by police as
part of a “community
speedwatch” scheme to catch
drivers breaking rules in the areas
that plod himself cannot (be

bothered to) reach. The bad news is
that this will empower local
busybodies in high-viz jackets to
leap out and give you a heart attack
when you finally accelerate away
from a traffic jam on the morning
school run. The good news is that, as
drivers can’t be prosecuted using
evidence from volunteers, you won’t
get a fine. Or points. Just a letter
from the police.
My hope is that it will say: “Dear
Mr Coren, some meddling nerk has
zapped you doing 24mph on an
empty road round Hampstead Heath
at 4.23am; will you be going round to
give him a slap in the chops and tell
him to mind his own business, or can
we do it for you?”

for example, is a prime weapon in
the campaign of western takeover
identified by Macron. The
accusation aims to silence any
criticism of the Islamic world,
however well founded, and incites
and sanitises attacks on people who
make any such criticism. It also
hinders Muslim reformers in France
and elsewhere who are engaged in a
desperate and dangerous struggle to
promote moderate views.

Macron’s aim to create a synthesis
between French secularism and
Islam has been attacked by
Islamic fundamentalists as “racism”
and by assimilated Muslims for
trying to turn France into a
caliphate. Among many Muslim
reformers, however, his words have
been welcomed. In Middle East
Online, an Iraqi writer, Farouk
Yousef, wrote: “Islam is in crisis
because it has been distorted,
mutilated, and destroyed from
within. We should have said
thank you to Macron rather than
curse him.”
Similarly praising Macron’s
initiative, the Saudi writer Fahad
Shoqiran nevertheless criticised

France for having enabled the rise of
Islamism because it “did not enact
laws that deter the institutions of
political Islam, which enabled them
to penetrate the communities there”.
The threat from Islamic fanaticism
won’t recede unless Islam is
reformed from within. Absent that
happy development, the single most
important task for the West is to stop
demonising those sounding a
warning, identify its own core values
and then make no allowances in
defending them.

Charlie Hebdo’s old offices after the
start of the trial of people accused of
involvement in the massacre there.
As the problem has worsened,
however, the state has responded by
cracking down on those sounding
the alarm. The journalist Éric
Zemmour, for example, is under
investigation by the authorities
because of “Islamophobic prejudice”
and “incitement to racial prejudice”.
His alleged offence was to criticise,

after Mehmoud’s attack, immigration
and the “uncontrolled presence of
unaccompanied minors, many of
whom lie about their age and turn
out to be thieves and assassins”. Yet
Mehmoud had entered France
illegally in 2018 and asked for asylum
as an “isolated minor”, having lied to
a judge that he was 18.
Zemmour uses inflammatory
language and is regarded as an
extremist. However, Jean-Louis
Thiériot, the former president of the
departmental council of Seine-et-
Marne in Paris, told Le Figaro that
migrants often claim to be children
owing to the benefits they receive
and that almost 80 per cent of such
claims in his area were fraudulent.

Macron has used tough rhetoric,
stating that “Islamic separatism” is
problematic and warning that the
goal of the “ideology of Islamism” is
to “take complete control” of society.
Despite such fierce language, it’s
doubtful whether his new measures
will have much effect. It is not enough
to tackle problematic behaviour
within the Muslim community; both
France and the West in general also
need to put a stop to assumptions of
their own that foster it.
The accusation of Islamophobia,

T


he horrific murder of a
teacher last Friday has

graphically illustrated
France’s deepening crisis
over Islamist fanaticism.

Samuel Paty, who taught in a


suburban school in Paris, was


beheaded by Abdullakh Anzorov, an


18-year-old Muslim of Chechen


origin who had been granted leave to


remain in France as a refugee.


Paty was murdered because he had


shown his class satirical cartoons of


Islam’s prophet, Muhammad. He


showed these cartoons every year as


part of a discussion about freedom


after the attack in 2015 on the


magazine Charlie Hebdo, when 12


people were murdered and 11 injured


because it had republished these and


other cartoons mocking Muhammad.


The French authorities


investigating Paty’s murder have


arrested 11 people suspected of


terrorist sympathies who are linked


to the killer and to the father of a


pupil in the teacher’s class who had


started an internet campaign against


him with the help of a radical imam.


The atrocity came hard on the


heels of new measures that


President Macron had announced to


tackle Islamism. These included


tightening controls over schools,


requiring imams to be trained and


licensed in France, and requiring
state-subsidised community
associations to sign a contract of
commitment to French secular
values.
Islamism, or politicised Islam that
aims to subject all societies to
Islamic religious precepts, is an
interpretation founded in the
religious sources. It is, however,
resisted by millions of Muslims
who abhor the idea of a supremacist

holy war and want to live under
human rights.
The Islamist problem in France is
of a different type and order of
magnitude from Britain. With a large
number of descendants from
France’s colonial past in north Africa,
French Islamists are more numerous,
more violent and more implacable.
Segregated into dormitory areas
ringing the big cities, they have
turned these into no-go areas for the

French authorities, who have
responded to sporadic violence there
with persistent appeasement.
There have been a series of
atrocities as well as that carried out
at Charlie Hebdo — the attack on a
Jewish school in Toulouse in 2012,
the simultaneous attacks on the
Bataclan concert hall and other Paris
venues in November 2015, and the
Nice truck attack in July 2016. Last
month a 25-year-old Pakistani man,
Zaheer Hassan Mehmoud, wounded
two people with a cleaver outside

The state has cracked


down on those who


sounded the alarm


way of doing the clocks was the
“natural” way. Which I presumed to
mean that it was not the gay or
lefty or Muslim way. And that felt
like a good, strong, conservative
opinion to have on the big issue,
and I thought I might hold it for
the day, if I could only remember
for three seconds at a time which
of the two it was that was only
right and proper for all
clean-living,
heteronormative
Christian natives, and
which was an
abomination to God
and all right-thinking
humans.
But I can’t. So I have

decided next week to
put my clock neither
forwards nor back,
but sideways. At the
stroke of whenever it
is that you’re supposed
to do it (usually 2am –
to guarantee
maximum likelihood
of no one
remembering), I plan
to fling the time on
all my clocks from
2am to 2pm — either
on the following or
previous day, but not
make a note of
which, so that I wake
up in the morning to

find that it is, in fact, early evening,
and I am 12 hours late for
everything, or possibly early.
The great thing about this system
is that it couldn’t be any more
confusing than the one we have at
the moment, at least we won’t be
arguing about one piddly hour
either way, and, let’s face it, nobody
is going anywhere or doing
anything anyway at the moment, so
who gives a flying clock what bloody
time it is?

A plague on Blair’s bar


I


nteresting that the restaurant
Tony Blair visited last month in
(possible) contravention of
Covid quarantine

regulations was the
dismal Harry’s Bar in
Mayfair, a sick,
pretentious, wildly
overpriced
knock-off of
the equally
overrated
Venice
original,
created
for the
refreshment of
London’s least
salubrious non-
domiciled plutocrats,
kleptocrats, kakistocrats
and smelligarchs and just
exactly the sort of place I

Giles Coren Notebook


Melanie


Phillips


@melanielatest


who gives a flying clock
time it is?

A plague on B


nteresting that the
Tony Blair visited
(possible) contrave
Covid quaran

regulation
dismal H
Mayfair
preten
over
kn
t

fo
ref
Lon
salubr
domicile
kleptocrats, k
and smelligar
exactlytheso
Free download pdf