The Times - UK (2020-10-20)

(Antfer) #1

the times | Tuesday October 20 2020 2GM 5


News


DAVE BENETT/GETTY IMAGES FOR AQUA SHARD

Dyson sells Singapore


penthouse for £7m loss


H


e is Britain’s
richest man
with a fortune
of £16.2 billion,
a global business empire
and a pop art collection
that is the envy of
galleries around the
world (Sean O’Neill
writes). Yet there are
signs that the designer
and entrepreneur Sir
James Dyson may be
losing his Midas touch.
The tycoon is selling
his triplex penthouse in
Singapore at a loss of
£7 million. He bought the
“super penthouse” on the
top three floors of the
Tanjong Pagar Centre in
July last year for about
£43 million.
It is the second setback
in the city-state for Sir
James, a prominent
Brexit supporter, since he
announced last year that
he was moving his
headquarters to

Singapore from
Wiltshire. Shortly
afterwards Sir James
confirmed that he was
shelving plans to build an
electric car plant in
Singapore because the
project was not
commercially viable.
Dyson company
sources insisted that the
sale of the property would
have no impact on its
business plans.
The family owns
another property in
Singapore, a
£26 million bungalow
overlooking the city’s
botanic gardens.
Sir James, 73, who
topped this year’s
Sunday Times
Rich List, bought
the penthouse on a
99-year lease. The
property has a pool,
jacuzzi and a
600-bottle wine cellar.
He is selling to the

businessman Leo
Koguan, chairman of the
IT provider SHI
International, whose
clients include Boeing
and AT&T.
Sir James’s
move to
Singapore
drew criticism
amid claims
that it would

cost Britain up to
£60 million a year in lost
corporation tax revenues.
The Dyson business
retains a research and
development base at
Hullavington, Wiltshire,
where engineers
developed a ventilator
during the first
coronavirus wave.
The Dyson family’s
British home is the
Dodington Park estate in
the Cotswolds. Sir
James recently
upset some
local
residents with
plans to build
a gallery to
display his
art
collection,
including
pieces by
David
Hockney
and Sir Peter
Blake, to the
public.
A Dyson
spokesman
declined to
comment on the
sale of the penthouse.

Sir James Dyson, below
with his wife, paid
£43 million for the
penthouse, which
spans three floors

Leslie weeps as


jury clears him


of sex attack at


Christmas party


attacked or assaulted anyone, you
know, ever.” In court he said such be-
haviour was “not in my nature” and that
he had wrongly been portrayed as an
“aggressive sexual monster” in the me-
dia. The court was told he had no mem-
ory of meeting the woman and “denied
that he did any such thing and if there
was any unwanted contact between
them it must have been accidental”.
Gudrun Young, for the defence, said
the woman’s memory may have “be-
come embellished and exaggerated in
her mind” over the years, and asked the
jury: “Did she invent it because she
wanted her own MeToo story to tell?”
Ms Young told the court that, by
2008, Mr Leslie had a public reputation
as a “sex pest” because of “completely
false” sexual allegations. She said that
he was a “broken man” who was “ultra-
cautious” in his behaviour and still hop-
ing to resurrect his career, adding: “He
is the last man on Earth who would
think he could do something like that
and think... he could get away with it.”
The court was told that Ulrika Jons-
son, the TV personality, had written in
a 2002 autobiography that an unnamed
man had raped her in 1988. Matthew
Wright, a presenter, claimed on air in
2002 that the allegation referred to Mr
Leslie. Mr Leslie denied this and Ms
Jonsson never commented. The jury
was told that Mr Wright had apologised
for giving Mr Leslie’s name “in error”.
The jury was told that other allega-
tions were then reported. Police
charged him in 2003 with two indecent
assaults from 1997, leading to the abort-
ed trial. In 2008 he was arrested for an
alleged rape and indecent assault in


  1. It was deemed there was insuffi-
    cient evidence to charge him. Mr Leslie
    was later accused of sexually assaulting
    a woman in an Edinburgh nightclub in

  2. Edinburgh sheriff court found the
    charge not proven in 2018.
    Several former colleagues appeared
    during his latest trial. Anthea Turner
    said: “He was always respectful, incred-
    ibly respectful, with me and the team at
    Blue Peter, a largely female team.” He
    declined to comment as he left court.


Kaya Burgess


A widow has claimed that the wrong


person is being blamed for her hus-


band’s death on a “smart motorway”


after the lorry driver who crashed into


him was jailed yesterday.


Claire Mercer said she believed that


her husband, Jason, 44, would be alive if


there had been a hard shoulder on the


stretch of the M1 in Sheffield where he


and Alexandru Murgeanu, 22, were


killed last year when they were hit by an


18-tonne HGV driven by Prezemyslaw


Szuba, 40.


Sheffield crown court heard yester-


day that the victims had pulled into the


slow lane and got out of their vehicles to


swap details after a “minor collision”.


They were standing between the cars


when the lorry crashed into them.


Szuba was jailed for ten months yes-


Dublin, said: “The last thing we want is
to unduly alarm parents, particularly
when we don’t have sufficient informa-
tion on the potential consequences of
microplastics on infant health. We are
calling on policy-makers to reassess the
guidelines for formula preparation...
we have found that it is possible to miti-
gate the risk of ingesting microplastics
by changing practices around sterilisa-
tion and formula preparation.”
Fay Couceiro, a biogeochemistry fel-
low at Portsmouth University, who was
not involved in the research, said the re-
sults were worrying but that formula
feeding was a must for parents who
could not breastfeed, adding that the
known risks from not sterilising bottles
outweighed those of microplastics.

Babies could swallow mass


of microplastics in bottles


Rhys Blakely Science Correspondent


Smart motorway ‘killed my husband’


terday after admitting two counts of
causing death by driving without due
care and attention.
Speaking outside court Mrs Mercer,
who has set up a campaign group called
Smart Motorways Kill, said: “We don’t
believe the correct person is taking
responsibility for this massive detri-
mental effect on ours and so many
other people’s lives.
“The events of June 7 would not have
taken place if there had been a hard
shoulder and Highways England was
run with the correct priorities in mind,
not concentrating on who wins the next
big contract. My hope in this devasta-
tion is that no more lives are ruined
needlessly.”
Jeremy Evans, for the prosecution,
told the court that according to a crash
investigator Szuba would have had up
to five seconds to take evasive action.

In CCTV footage other traffic can be
seen slowing down and pulling into the
right-hand lane to pass the vehicles. Mr
Mercer and Mr Murgeanu had been
standing on the carriageway for more
than five minutes, Mr Evans said.
Andrew Smith, defending, said his
client’s “negligence” and “lack of con-
centration” was “not the only cause”.
He described smart motorways as
unsafe and a “wholly inadequate road
system”.
Judge Jeremy Richardson, QC, told
Szuba: “It was careless driving on your
part. I have no doubt whatever that you
are the main component cause of the
catastrophic crash.” On smart motor-
ways, he said: “I am not conducting a
public inquiry into the advantages or
disadvantages... It appears this form of
highway is controversial and has been
the subject of criticism.”

Charlotte Wace, Graeme Paton


A baby could ingest 2.6 million micro-
particles of plastic a day when fed for-
mula from bottles made of the most
common material, a study suggests.
Researchers found that bottles made
from polypropylene shed particles
when formula was prepared in them. A
baby could ingest as many as 2.6 million
a day, they calculated, but it was not
known if they were harmful.
The scientists, whose research is pub-
lished in Nature Food, said that parents
could reduce infants’ exposure by not
reheating prepared formula in plastic
containers, avoiding microwaves and
not vigorously shaking the bottle.
John Boland, of Trinity College

The former TV presenter John Leslie


wept after he was acquitted of sexual


assault yesterday, as a judge said he


could leave “without a stain” on his


character.


Mr Leslie, 55, wiped away tears and


put his head in his hands after the jury


returned from 23 minutes of delibera-


tions to find him not guilty of grabbing


a woman’s breasts at a Christmas party


12 years ago. His father, Les Stott,


punched the air and Mr Leslie left the


dock and wept as he embraced him.


Mr Leslie, whose real name is John


Stott, hosted Blue Peter, Wheel of For-


tune and This Morning in the 1990s. He


has been the subject of allegations of


sexual assault and rape over the past 18


years but has always denied them and


has never been convicted or cautioned.


His barrister had urged the jury not to


believe in “no smoke without fire”.


In 2003, after charges of indecent


assault against Mr Leslie were dropped


at Southwark crown court before a trial,


he was told he could leave “without a


stain” on his character. After the verdict


was read out there yesterday Judge


Deborah Taylor said: “This is the second


time you leave this court without a stain


on your character. I hope that it will be


the last time you have to attend.”


The complainant, who said that she


had gone to a Christmas party in the


West End in 2008 with her boyfriend


and friends, claimed to have introduced


herself to Mr Leslie and shaken his


hand. She alleged that he then groped


her breasts before laughing and walk-


ing off. There were no witnesses.She


went to the police in 2017 after being


inspired by the #MeToo movement.


Mr Leslie told officers: “I have never


John Leslie was
a broken man,
his barrister said
Free download pdf