Cuzco’s central Aucaypata   plaza   in  this    manner; a   similar structure   graces  the
main     upper   plaza   in  Incallacta,     Bolivia.    Finally,    the     term   ushnu    is  frequently
applied  to  any     platform    flanking    or  in  the     center  of  a   plaza   at  an  Inca    site,
regardless  of  form    or  function.
While   these   descriptions    are the two most    commonly    used    by  archaeologists,
R.  Tom Zuidema has argued  that    the term    originally  referred    to  an  opening or  a
duct     into    the     ground  through     which   liquids     could   be  poured.     According   to
Zuidema,    only    later   did the term    refer   to  the structures  described   above,  and only
if   these   were    associated  with    an  opening     or  duct,   he  argues,     is  the    ushnu
appellation correct.
Neither the term    ushnu   nor any of  its variations  is  mentioned   by  any of  the
earliest    western visitors    to  the Inca    Empire. Betanzos    and Pedro   Pizarro do  not
employ  the word    in  describing  the platform,   upright stone,  and basin   complex
found   in  Cuzco’s central plaza.  Nor does    Pedro   de  Cieza   de  León    use the term
to   describe    the     largest     of  what    is  now     considered  the     prototypical   ushnu,   the
stepped structure   at  Vilcashuaman.   The word’s  earliest    use is  found   in  Domingo
de  Santo   Tomás’s Quechua dictionary  published   in  1560,   almost  a   decade  later
than     Betanzos    and     Cieza,  in  which   he  defines     it  as  “altar”     without     further
elaboration.     Only    in  the     1570s   do  other   chroniclers     such    as Cristóbal    de
Albornoz    and Cristóbal   de  Molina   begin   to  employ  this    term    in  connection
with    Cuzco’s Aucaypata   plaza.
Colonial    chroniclers and modern  scholars    have    interpreted ushnus  as  sanctified
central  spaces,     openings    into    which   libations   and     other   offerings   were    made,
stages   from    which   the     Inca    king    and     lords   could   preside     over    festivals   and
ceremonial   events,     seats   of  the     Sun,    and     places  from    where   astronomical
observations     were    made.   Determining     which   or  how     many    of  these   functions
occurred     at  a   particular ushnu    is  often   problematic,    reflecting  the     paucity     of
detailed    historical  descriptions    (most   of  which   are focused on  Cuzco)  and the
lack     of  modern  excavations     and     published   reports.    Only    the     Anonymous
Chronicler,  writing     in  the     late    sixteenth^ or^ early    seventeenth     century,    for
example,     associates  an ushnu   (that    of  Aucaypata,  Cuzco)  with    astronomical
observations     related     to  the     agricultural    calendar,   while   modern  scholars    have
suggested   that    the site    of  Huánuco Pampa   was organized   and constructed around
a   series  of  astronomical    alignments  emanating   from    its ushnu.
Nevertheless,   almost  all chroniclers and scholars    agree   that    ushnus  were    places
reserved    for rituals,    spectacles, and religious   and political   performances,   though
the  same    performances    may     not     have    been    performed   at  each    such    stage   or
                    
                      bozica vekic
                      (Bozica Vekic)
                      
                    
                #1