Unit 1 Engineering Physics

(achs6699) #1
Room-Temperature Young’s, Shear and Bulk 1.5. FACTORS AFFECTING ELASTICITY
Moduli and Poisson’s Ratio for Various materials

(Figure 6.5), application of the load corresponds to moving from the origin up and
along the straight line. Upon release of the load, the line is traversed in the oppo-
site direction, back to the origin.
There are some materials (e.g., gray cast iron, concrete, and many polymers)
for which this elastic portion of the stress–strain curve is not linear (Figure 6.6);
hence, it is not possible to determine a modulus of elasticity as described previously.
For this nonlinear behavior, either tangentor secant modulusis normally used. Tan-
gent modulus is taken as the slope of the stress–strain curve at some specified level
of stress, whereas secant modulus represents the slope of a secant drawn from the
origin to some given point of the curve. The determination of these moduli is
illustrated in Figure 6.6.
On an atomic scale, macroscopic elastic strain is manifested as small changes
in the interatomic spacing and the stretching of interatomic bonds. As a conse-
quence, the magnitude of the modulus of elasticity is a measure of the resistance
to separation of adjacent atoms, that is, the interatomic bonding forces. Further-
more, this modulus is proportional to the slope of the interatomic force–separation
curve (Figure 2.8a) at the equilibrium spacing:

(6.6)

Figure 6.7 shows the force–separation curves for materials having both strong and
weak interatomic bonds; the slope at r 0 is indicated for each.

Er a

dF
dr

b
r 0

sñ!

6.3 Stress–Strain Behavior • 157

Strain

Stress

0

0

Slope = modulus
of elasticity

Unload

Load

Table 6.1 Room-Temperature Elastic and Shear Moduli and Poisson’s Ratio
for Various Metal Alloys

Modulus of
Elasticity Shear Modulus Poisson’s
Metal Alloy GPa 106 psi GPa 106 psi Ratio
Aluminum 69 10 25 3.6 0.33
Brass 97 14 37 5.4 0.34
Copper 110 16 46 6.7 0.34
Magnesium 45 6.5 17 2.5 0.29
Nickel 207 30 76 11.0 0.31
Steel 207 30 83 12.0 0.30
Titanium 107 15.5 45 6.5 0.34
Tungsten 407 59 160 23.2 0.28

Figure 6.5 Schematic stress–strain diagram showing linear
elastic deformation for loading and unloading cycles.

JWCL187_ch06_150-196.qxd 11/5/09 9:36 AM Page 157

Material

(Figure 6.5), application of the load corresponds to moving from the origin up and
along the straight line. Upon release of the load, the line is traversed in the oppo-
site direction, back to the origin.
There are some materials (e.g., gray cast iron, concrete, and many polymers)
for which this elastic portion of the stress–strain curve is not linear (Figure 6.6);
hence, it is not possible to determine a modulus of elasticity as described previously.
For this nonlinear behavior, either tangentor secant modulusis normally used. Tan-
gent modulus is taken as the slope of the stress–strain curve at some specified level
of stress, whereas secant modulus represents the slope of a secant drawn from the
origin to some given point of the curve. The determination of these moduli is
illustrated in Figure 6.6.
On an atomic scale, macroscopic elastic strain is manifested as small changes
in the interatomic spacing and the stretching of interatomic bonds. As a conse-
quence, the magnitude of the modulus of elasticity is a measure of the resistance
to separation of adjacent atoms, that is, the interatomic bonding forces. Further-
more, this modulus is proportional to the slope of the interatomic force–separation
curve (Figure 2.8a) at the equilibrium spacing:

(6.6)

Figure 6.7 shows the force–separation curves for materials having both strong and
weak interatomic bonds; the slope at r 0 is indicated for each.

Er a

dF
dr

b
r 0

sñ!

6.3 Stress–Strain Behavior • 157

Strain

Stress

0

0

Slope = modulus
of elasticity

Unload

Load

Table 6.1 Room-Temperature Elastic and Shear Moduli and Poisson’s Ratio
for Various Metal Alloys

Modulus of
Elasticity Shear Modulus Poisson’s
Metal Alloy GPa 106 psi GPa 106 psi Ratio
Aluminum 69 10 25 3.6 0.33
Brass 97 14 37 5.4 0.34
Copper 110 16 46 6.7 0.34
Magnesium 45 6.5 17 2.5 0.29
Nickel 207 30 76 11.0 0.31
Steel 207 30 83 12.0 0.30
Titanium 107 15.5 45 6.5 0.34
Tungsten 407 59 160 23.2 0.28

Figure 6.5 Schematic stress–strain diagram showing linear
elastic deformation for loading and unloading cycles.

JWCL187_ch06_150-196.qxd 11/5/09 9:36 AM Page 157

Young’s
Modulus
(GPa)

(Figure 6.5), application of the load corresponds to moving from the origin up and
along the straight line. Upon release of the load, the line is traversed in the oppo-
site direction, back to the origin.
There are some materials (e.g., gray cast iron, concrete, and many polymers)
for which this elastic portion of the stress–strain curve is not linear (Figure 6.6);
hence, it is not possible to determine a modulus of elasticity as described previously.
For this nonlinear behavior, either tangentor secant modulusis normally used. Tan-
gent modulus is taken as the slope of the stress–strain curve at some specified level
of stress, whereas secant modulus represents the slope of a secant drawn from the
origin to some given point of the curve. The determination of these moduli is
illustrated in Figure 6.6.
On an atomic scale, macroscopic elastic strain is manifested as small changes
in the interatomic spacing and the stretching of interatomic bonds. As a conse-
quence, the magnitude of the modulus of elasticity is a measure of the resistance
to separation of adjacent atoms, that is, the interatomic bonding forces. Further-
more, this modulus is proportional to the slope of the interatomic force–separation
curve (Figure 2.8a) at the equilibrium spacing:

(6.6)

Figure 6.7 shows the force–separation curves for materials having both strong and
weak interatomic bonds; the slope at r 0 is indicated for each.

Er a

dF
dr

b
r 0

sñ!

6.3 Stress–Strain Behavior • 157

Strain

Stress

0

0

Slope = modulus
of elasticity

Unload

Load

Table 6.1 Room-Temperature Elastic and Shear Moduli and Poisson’s Ratio
for Various Metal Alloys

Modulus of
Elasticity Shear Modulus Poisson’s
Metal Alloy GPa 106 psi GPa 106 psi Ratio
Aluminum 69 10 25 3.6 0.33
Brass 97 14 37 5.4 0.34
Copper 110 16 46 6.7 0.34
Magnesium 45 6.5 17 2.5 0.29
Nickel 207 30 76 11.0 0.31
Steel 207 30 83 12.0 0.30
Titanium 107 15.5 45 6.5 0.34
Tungsten 407 59 160 23.2 0.28

Figure 6.5 Schematic stress–strain diagram showing linear
elastic deformation for loading and unloading cycles.

JWCL187_ch06_150-196.qxd 11/5/09 9:36 AM Page 157

Shear
Modulus
(GPa)

(Figure 6.5), application of the load corresponds to moving from the origin up and
along the straight line. Upon release of the load, the line is traversed in the oppo-
site direction, back to the origin.
There are some materials (e.g., gray cast iron, concrete, and many polymers)
for which this elastic portion of the stress–strain curve is not linear (Figure 6.6);
hence, it is not possible to determine a modulus of elasticity as described previously.
For this nonlinear behavior, either tangentor secant modulusis normally used. Tan-
gent modulus is taken as the slope of the stress–strain curve at some specified level
of stress, whereas secant modulus represents the slope of a secant drawn from the
origin to some given point of the curve. The determination of these moduli is
illustrated in Figure 6.6.
On an atomic scale, macroscopic elastic strain is manifested as small changes
in the interatomic spacing and the stretching of interatomic bonds. As a conse-
quence, the magnitude of the modulus of elasticity is a measure of the resistance
to separation of adjacent atoms, that is, the interatomic bonding forces. Further-
more, this modulus is proportional to the slope of the interatomic force–separation
curve (Figure 2.8a) at the equilibrium spacing:

(6.6)

Figure 6.7 shows the force–separation curves for materials having both strong and
weak interatomic bonds; the slope at r 0 is indicated for each.

Er a

dF
dr

b
r 0

sñ!

6.3 Stress–Strain Behavior • 157

Strain

Stress

0

0

Slope = modulus
of elasticity

Unload

Load

Table 6.1 Room-Temperature Elastic and Shear Moduli and Poisson’s Ratio
for Various Metal Alloys

Modulus of
Elasticity Shear Modulus Poisson’s
Metal Alloy GPa 106 psi GPa 106 psi Ratio
Aluminum 69 10 25 3.6 0.33
Brass 97 14 37 5.4 0.34
Copper 110 16 46 6.7 0.34
Magnesium 45 6.5 17 2.5 0.29
Nickel 207 30 76 11.0 0.31
Steel 207 30 83 12.0 0.30
Titanium 107 15.5 45 6.5 0.34
Tungsten 407 59 160 23.2 0.28

Figure 6.5 Schematic stress–strain diagram showing linear
elastic deformation for loading and unloading cycles.

JWCL187_ch06_150-196.qxd 11/5/09 9:36 AM Page 157


Poisson’s
Ratio

Bulk
Modulus
(GPa)

70
80
123
45
180
140
110
310

Solids

Liquids
Water
Ethyl Alcohol
Mercury

2.0
1.0
2.5

Gases
Air, H 2 , He, CO 2 1.01 x 10 -4

Table 1.1: Room-Temperature Young’s, Shear and Bulk Moduli and Poisson’s Ratio for
Various materials

In most metals G is about 0.4Y; thus, if the value of one modulus is known, the other
may be approximated.

1.5 Factors Aecting elasticity


Solids are made up of a large number of atoms or molecules arranged in a tightly packed
manner. In the case of crystalline solids, this arrangement also will be in regular periodic
fashion such that the neighbourhood of any atom is identical to that of any other atom
in the solid. Therefore, materials properties are the net result of the collective physical
characteristics of the constituent atoms, how these atoms interact with one another and
geometrical structure in which they are arranged in the bulk material. Each atom in
the solid experiences forces due to the surrounding atoms.The size and shape of a solid
specimen is decided by the stable equilibrium position that every atom finds itself in as
a result of the balance of the interatomic forces. When an external force is applied, this
equilibrium is disturbed and a new equilibrium is reached where the internal atomic forces
and the eternal force are again balanced. This corresponds to the deformed shape of the
solid. When the external force is removed, the solid returns to the old equilibrium and
the original shape is regained.

Elastic properties properties, such as Young’s Modulus, tensile strength, etc. can
be altered by modifying the eect internal forces and the arrangement of atoms in the
material. Below is a brief discussion of the factors upon which elasticity of a solid depends.

Eect of stress: Due to large constant stress or repeated application cycles of stresses

PH8151 17 LICET
Free download pdf