their   application.^8  But there   are a   few deities of  whom    the honorific   sang-yang   is
used,   but not batara, e.g.    sang-yang   tunggal,    ‘the    only    God,’   sang-yang   sokma,
etc.
“Thus   batara  would   seem    to  be  limited in  use to  the actual  names   of  Hindu
deities as  distinct    from    epithets    describing  those   deities.    “Batara Guru”   would
seem    to  be  an  exception—the   only    one—to  this    rule,   and to  point   to  the fact    that
the original    meaning of  guru    had been    lost    sight   of, and that    the expression  had
come    to  be  regarded    only    as  a   proper  name.”
Occasionally,   as  is  only    to  be  expected,   the Malays  get mixed   in  their
mythology,  and of  this    Mr. Wilkinson   gives   two examples,   one of  the
identification  of  Batara  Guru    (Shiva) with    Brahma  (Bĕrahmana),    and another of
the drawing of  a   distinction between “Guru”  (Shiva) and “Mahadewa,” which
latter  is  only    another name    for the same    divinity.
Such    slips   are inevitable  among   an  illiterate  people, and should  always  be
criticised  by  comparison  with    the original    Hindu   tenets, from    which   these   ideas
may be  presumed    to  have    proceeded.
Mr. Wilkinson   quotes  an  extraordinary   genealogy   representing,   inter   alia,   “Guru
as  the actual  father  of  the Hindu   Trinity,”   and also    of  “Sambu” (whom   he  cannot
identify),  and “Sĕri,  who is  the Hindu   Sri,    the goddess of  grain,  and,    therefore,  a
deity   of  immense importance  to  the old Javanese    and Malays.”
On  this    I   would   only    remark  that    Sambu   (or Jambu)  is  the first   portion of  the
name    almost  universally ascribed    to  the Crocodile-spirit    by  the Peninsular
Malays.^9
It  would   be  beyond  the scope   of  this    work    to  attempt the identification  of  Batara
Guru    (Shiva) with    all the numerous    manifestations  and titles  attributed  to  him by
the Malays, but the special manifestation   (of Shiva), which   is  called  “Kala,”
forms   an  integral    part    of  the general conception, whether among   the Malays  or
Hindus, and is, therefore,  deserving   of  some    attention.
The Malay   conception  of  Batara  Guru    seems   to  have    been    that    he  had both    a
good    and a   bad side    to  his character.  Though  he  was “Destroyer” he  was also
“Restorer-to-life,”^10 and it would appear that these two opposite manifestations
