2019-04-01_Wildlife_Ranching_Magazine

(avery) #1

wildlife economy


Unfortunately, people are often bad at recognising
this and end up locked in struggles over fairness even
as the pie starts to shrink as a consequence of this
conflict. Sensible entrepreneurs in the wildlife industry
should try to avoid this trap and explore opportunities for
growing the pie while at least partly addressing fairness
concerns. In other words, sensible entrepreneurs in
the wildlife industry should focus on balancing both the
short-term objective of seeking to profit from existing
legitimate market opportunities as well as keeping an
eye on the socio-political movements and trends that will
ultimately determine long-term consumer demand as
well as what is politically possible and supported.


  1. Equity concerns, which
    are typically more aligned with
    recognisable political movements,
    relate to fair distribution of the
    proverbial pie, as well as fairness
    in the means of production. For the
    wildlife industry, some might argue
    that equity would also entail fair
    treatment, not only of other people,
    but of other animals.

  2. Finally, sustainability is
    concerned with ensuring that
    sufficient pie may also be enjoyed
    by future generations. In the realm of
    wildlife management, sustainability
    means avoiding overexploitation
    of the land and its soil, water,
    vegetation and wildlife, to maintain
    ecosystem resilience and ensure
    that future levels of productive
    capacity remain adequate. These
    concerns for fairness – to other
    people, animals, future generations
    of people, and nature in general –
    underpin most political movements
    relating to wildlife.
    It should be obvious that economic
    efficiency and fairness are somehow
    linked. It is generally easier to
    address issues of fairness when the
    proverbial economic pie is growing.

Free download pdf