The Times - UK (2020-11-26)

(Antfer) #1

2 2GM Thursday November 26 2020 | the times


News


Millions of retired people were dealt a
blow by the chancellor yesterday as he
pressed ahead with changes to the
retail prices index (RPI) that will mean
a fall in the value of their pension pay-
outs from 2030.
Rishi Sunak allowed some breathing
room by not introducing the change for
2025, as had been considered by the
Treasury.
Those with the more generous de-
fined benefit workplace pension plans,
supported by employers, have their
pension payments increased each year
in line with RPI, the cost of living baro-
meter. In 2013 statisticians said that the
measure overstated inflation and have
since urged the use of measures based
on the consumer prices index, typically
about 1 per cent per year lower.
The UK Statistics Authority asked

Pension payouts to fall under shake-up


Robert Miller last year to be allowed to recalculate the
RPI to fall in line with CPI and addi-
tional measures of housing costs. The
Treasury said that it would consider
bringing in the reform, which would
also lower the interest payments made
on bonds, which are linked to the RPI,
between 2025 and 2030.
Mr Sunak said yesterday that an im-
mediate change to the RPI would be too
disruptive. “I will be unable to offer my
consent to the implementation of such
a proposal before the maturity of the
final specific index-linked gilt in 2030,”
the chancellor said in a letter to the sta-
tistics authority.
Critics of the RPI have said that the
failure to adopt reforms had effectively
cost the public billions in extra interest
paid on government bonds.
Lane, Clark & Peacock, the pensions
consultancy, warned that some pension
funds would face a deficit, even with the

changes pushed back to 2030. Jonathan
Camfield, a partner, said: “The schemes
that will suffer the most are those that
have invested heavily in index-linked
government bonds and have their
benefit increases linked to CPI.”
Women and the newly retired will be
hardest hit by the changes, which were
revealed in documents released along-
side the spending review but not men-
tioned in Mr Sunak’s speech. Over time,
the value of their pensions could be
thousands of pounds less than they
might have expected. An individual
aged 65 at present will see their total
retirement income drop by 4 or 5 per
cent compared with their expectations.
The proposed changes do not affect
the state pension, which will rise by
2.5 per cent in April, in line with the
government’s triple-lock promise.
Prices index change will hit pensions,
Business, page 39

Johnson backs the campaign


for half of MPs to be women


Ross Kempsell
Special Correspondent, Times Radio
Boris Johnson appears to have commit-
ted the Conservatives to equal gender
representation at Westminster.
The prime minister suggested it in a
two-minute video message to the 50:
Parliament campaign, but The Times
understands that he is not considering
ordering measures such as new quotas
in selections for Tory candidates.
Mr Johnson said: “The past century
has seen women blazing a trail through
politics... From the first female MP to
the first female minister, prime minis-
ter, Speaker of the House of Commons

... and more. But there is one first that
is still long overdue, and that is the
moment when for the first time we
finally achieve 50:50 representation in
our parliament.
“So, on this anniversary of the Quali-
fication of Women Act, the legislation
that first opened the door to women
standing in a general election 102 years
ago, I want to urge women to put them-
selves forward for politics.
“I’m proud that today there are more
women in parliament than ever before.
But if we’re going to achieve 50:50, we
need the biggest ever recruitment drive
of women as candidates, activists and
potential MPs. I passionately believe if


you give men and women the same
opportunities, you will solve some of
the world’s toughest problems. So to
everybody at the 50:50 campaign I wish
you the best of luck.”
In the past the Conservatives have
stopped short of making a commitment
on the gender balance in parliament
and have avoided using affirmative
action such as all-women shortlists.
Last year Mr Johnson described
women making up half of Conservative
candidates, rather than MPs, as an
ambition. He said in November: “It is
my ambition that half of Conservative
candidates on our list for future parlia-
mentary elections are women.”
Frances Scott, director of 50:50 Par-
liament, said: “To me this feels like a
historic moment. We have never before
heard a Conservative Party leader pub-
licly state their support for fully equal
representation of women at Westmin-
ster. We want women to have equal
seats and an equal say on all policy mat-
ters. Our campaign wants to build a bet-
ter democracy and his support for our
mission is a game-changer for British
politics.
“Now a prime minister has finally ac-
knowledged that our parliament
should draw in an equal way upon the
widest possible pool of talent and
experience, including that of the 32 mil-

lion women living and working in the
UK.”
The prime minister’s remarks will re-
open questions over whether and how
the Conservatives will act to bring
about equal representation in parlia-
ment.
Asked whether the party should in-
troduce all-women shortlists, Baroness
Jenkin of Kennington, a Tory peer and
founder of Women2Win, told Times
Radio: “I don’t really know the answer
to that. I have always felt as long as we
made steady progress, it would be bet-
ter not to.”
In 2018 Brandon Lewis, the party
chairman, committed the party to
equal representation among its own
parliamentary candidates. But the
Conservatives declined to introduce
all-women shortlists, and have histori-
cally opposed them since Labour began
to operate them at general elections in
1997.
At last year’s general election 30 per
cent of Tory candidates were women
compared with 53 per cent for Labour.
When David Cameron was leader he
proposed all-women shortlists but did
not impose them. The use of quotas and
targets for equal representation is con-
troversial among Conservative back-
benchers and is a key battle line in so-
called culture wars politics.

© TIMES NEWSPAPERS LIMITED, 2020.
Published in print and all other derivative
formats by Times Newspapers Ltd, 1 London
Bridge St, London, SE1 9GF, telephone 020 7782


  1. Printed by: Newsprinters (Broxbourne)
    Ltd, Great Cambridge Rd, Waltham Cross, EN
    8DY; Newsprinters (Knowsley) Ltd, Kitling Rd,
    Prescot, Merseyside, L34 9HN; Newsprinters
    (Eurocentral) Ltd, Byramsmuir Road, Holytown,
    Motherwell, ML1 1NP; Johnston Press, Carn
    Web, Morton 3 Esky Drive, Carn Industial
    Estate, Portadown, BT63 5YY; Smurfit Kappa
    News Press Ltd, Kells Industrial Estate, Virginia
    Rd, Kells, County Meath, Ireland; KP Services,
    La Rue Martel, La Rue des Pres Trading Estate,
    St Saviour, Jersey, JE2 7QR. For permission to
    copy articles or headlines for internal
    information purposes contact Newspaper
    Licensing Agency at PO Box 101, Tunbridge
    Wells, TN1 1WX, tel 01892 525274, e-mail
    [email protected]. For all other reproduction and
    licensing inquiries contact Licensing
    Department, 1 London Bridge St, London, SE
    9GF, telephone 020 7711 7888,
    e-mail [email protected]


TODAY’S EDITION


LETTERS 32
LEADING ARTICLES 33
WORLD 34

BUSINESS 39
REGISTER 54
LAW 58

SPORT 64
CROSSWORD 74
TV & RADIO TIMES

FOLLOW US
thetimes timesandsundaytimes thetimes

COMMENT


Individualism powered the West’s rise.


Now it is the fuel burning through our crises
JAMES MARRIOTT, PAGE 30

OFFER


Save up to 40% with a subscription to


The Times and The Sunday Times
THETIMES.CO.UK/SUBSCRIBE

Plenty of sunshine and most places
will have a dry day, although feeling
chilly. Full forecast, page 62


THE WEATHER


5

7

16

6

9
7
9

7

9

5

Little space left


for bigger cars


Bigger cars mean that
motorists are being left
with as little as 21cm
on either side of a
parking space,
research shows.
Popular models have
grown by as much as
55 per cent since the
1970s. A study put the
annual bill for prangs
at £1.5 billion. Page 4


Older viewers
shunning BBC
Older viewers are
falling out of love
with the BBC. The
proportion of over-55s
with a positive
impression of the
broadcaster has slipped
from 64 per cent to 62
per cent and Britons
overall are spending
19 minutes a day less
on its services. Page 11

Tier rules to be
revealed today
London and Liverpool
are hopeful of being
spared the toughest
Tier 3 coronavirus
restrictions today but
only a handful of rural
areas are expected to
be placed in Tier 1. A
study showed that
Tier 1 had failed to cut
cases in 168 of 169
areas. Page 12

Football union
chief to quit
Gordon Taylor is to
stand down as head of
the Professional
Footballers’ Association
at the end of the
season. Mr Taylor, 75,
who has been chief
executive since 1981,
earns up to £2.3 million
a year, making him
Britain’s best-paid
union official. Page 67

Today’s
highlights

Listen for free DAB | Smart speaker | Online at times.radio | Times Radio app

8.40am Anneliese Dodds, the shadow chancellor
1.15pm Mariella Frostrup looks at how 2020 will
change our approach to Christmas shopping
2pm The author Philippa Gregory, right, on her latest
novel, Dark Tides
8.30pm The Joy Division and New Order
drummer Stephen Morris
10.30pm The former Labour MP Mary Creagh
and the former Conservative MP Alistair Burt
take a first look at tomorrow’s newspapers

Putin ‘girlfriend’


on £7.7m salary


Alina Kabaeva, 37,
a former Olympic
gymnastics champion
who is rumoured to be
in a relationship with
President Putin, was
paid a salary of
785 million roubles
(£7.7 million) to run a
pro-Kremlin media
group, a report has
said. Page 35


Liquidators
pursue PR cash
Partners of Bell
Pottinger have yet
to repay £1.8 million in
“excess drawings” that
they took before the
PR business collapsed
in 2017 amid a scandal
in South Africa,
liquidators say. A sum
is also being pursued
against a partner via
litigation. Page 39

llor
ill

r latest

continued from page 1
Spending review Analysis

C


harity begins
at home. Or
more precisely
the towns of
the Midlands and the
north of England that
the Conservatives will
need to defend to
keep power (Francis
Elliott writes).
This was not the
moment in which
Rishi Sunak faced up
to the realities of the
pandemic so much as
launched the 2024
election campaign.
In a symmetry too
neat to be accidental,
he moved £4 billion
from the overseas aid
budget to a new
“levelling-up” fund
aimed at cementing

Tories into former
Red Wall seats.
The chancellor did
not dwell on the deep
and lasting scars of
coronavirus. There
was no examination
of rising debt in the
next four years. The
return of mass
unemployment was at
least acknowledged
but the £4.3 billion set
aside over three years
for return-to-work
initiatives feels like a
small down payment.
Instead the
chancellor sketched
the campaign themes.
On public services he
insisted the above-
inflation one-year
spending round

proved there would be
no return to austerity,
and the government
was delivering on the
people’s priorities of
“new hospitals, better
schools and safer
streets”.
Yet the spending
review will be most
remembered for
completing the Tories’
post-David Cameron
realignment with the
ditching of the 0.7 per
cent foreign aid
target. Having
abandoned a
manifesto pledge on
aid, it is surely only a
matter of time before
Mr Sunak ditches
promises not to
increase taxes too.

economic think tank, calculated that
£12,000 per household had been spent
on the coronavirus response. Once the
recovery was secure the burden should
fall on tax rises rather than spending
cuts, it said. Balancing the present bud-
get in 2024-25 would require £27 billion
of fiscal consolidation.
Torsten Bell, its chief executive, said:
“The chancellor has rightly chosen to
double down on Covid spending, which
is set to total around £335 billion over
two years... But the chancellor less
noisily began the process of changing
his public finances plans for the years
ahead, opting to spend up to £13 billion
a year less on non-Covid public services
than previously planned.”
The OBR said that the immediate
economic outlook could be worse in the
event of a no-deal Brexit. It said that
this could reduce GDP by a further
2 per cent next year.
Reports and analysis, pages 6-
Questions on spending and Brexit
remain, leading article, page 33
Free download pdf