The Economist - USA (2020-11-21)

(Antfer) #1

74 Science & technology The EconomistNovember 21st 2020


1

I


n january 2019, when a Chinese space-
craft called Chang’e 4visited the Moon,
the mission broke new ground, figuratively
speaking, by landing on the far side of that
orb, which is perpetually invisible from
Earth and thus also out of direct radio con-
tact. This meant communications had to
be relayed by a satellite which had been
cunningly located for the purpose at a
place where the interaction of the gravita-
tional fields of Earth and Moon meant it
could orbit a point in empty space.
China’s next lunar mission, by contrast,
will break ground literally. Chang’e 5,
scheduled for launch around November
24th, is intended to drill two metres down
into the Moon’s surface, retrieve about 2kg
of rock, and then return this to Earth. If
successful, it will be the first lunar sample-
return mission since 1976, when a Soviet
probe called Luna 24sent back a mere 170g
of the stuff. And it will be another step for-
ward in China’s space programme.
The Chang’e missions, named after a
Chinese Moon goddess, have had their ups
and downs. Chang’e 5was originally sched-
uled for blast off in 2017, but the failure in
July of that year of an otherwise-unrelated
project that was, like Chang’e 5, using a
Long March 5 as its launch vehicle, caused a
delay. (Chang’e 4used a different sort of
launcher, a Long March 3b.) The “go” does,
however, now seem to have been given.
State media reported on November 17th
that the rocket with Chang’e 5on board has
been moved to its launch pad at Wenchang

space centre, on Hainan island.
Assuming the launch goes to plan, suc-
cess will then depend on a complex ballet
involving the craft’s four components.
These are a service module, a return-to-
Earth module, a lunar lander and an as-
cender—a configuration originally used by
America’s Apollo project. Once the mission
is in lunar orbit, the lander and the ascend-
er will separate from the orbiting mother
ship of service and return modules as a sin-
gle unit and go down to the surface. The
landing site is in the northern part of a vast
expanse of basalt called Oceanus Procella-
rum, a previously unvisited area. Research-
ers hope rocks collected here will confirm
that volcanic activity on the Moon contin-
ued until far more recently than the 3.5bn
years ago that is the estimate derived from
studies of currently available samples.
Once the new material has been gath-
ered, which will take several days, the as-
cender will lift off, dock with the mother
ship and transfer its haul to the return
module. The service module will then carry
the return module back to Earth, releasing
it just before arrival to make a landing at a
recovery site in Inner Mongolia, also used
for China’s crewed missions, in December.
Digging into the lunar surface may,
however, pose problems. InSight, an Amer-
ican rover now on the surface of Mars, has
struggled to operate a drill nicknamed “the
mole” that is designed to reach three me-
tres below ground level. According to
nasa, America’s space agency, this is be-
cause the mole has encountered clumpier
regolith than its designers were expecting,
causing it to bounce rather than burrow.
If Chang’e 5does manage to overcome
such hazards and return samples to Earth,
China has said little so far about which for-
eign countries, if any, will be granted ac-
cess to them. But America is likely to be last
in the queue. For the past couple of decades
American governments of all stripes have

been reluctant to co-operate with China in
space-related matters, largely because of
fears about giving away secrets useful for
designing ballistic missiles. In space, as in
so much else, the two powers are not-so-
friendly rivals. China’s stated goal is to es-
tablish a crewed base near the Moon’s
south pole, where water is available in the
form of ice perpetually shielded from sun-
light by crater walls. America has similar
plans. Watch, as it were, this space. 7

BEIJING
China plans to bring back the first
Moon rocks for 40 years

Space exploration

Mandate of heaven


This picture shows the 5,000-year-old
aftermath of a merger between two
stars—though the light that created it
took a further 6,000 years to reach Earth’s
neighbourhood. It was published in this
week’s Natureby Keri Hoadley of the
California Institute of Technology and her
colleagues. It is a composite of three
images taken at different frequencies, two
by the Galaxy Evolution Explorer, a space
telescope which operated from 2003 to
2012, and one from the ground. The blue
area represents gas ejected during the
merger. The faint red rings are the visible
traces of shock waves from the resulting
explosion. Such collisions are reasonably
common in binary star systems. But this
image is reckoned one of the clearest so
far of the consequences.

When stars collide

W


aiting for a breakthrough in the
fight against covid-19 has been a bit
like waiting for a bus to arrive. After almost
a year of watch-checking and neck-cran-
ing, two come along at once. First, on No-
vember 9th, Pfizer, an American pharma
giant and BioNTech, a German minnow,
announced that they had jointly developed
an effective vaccine for the illness. They
were followed, on November 16th, by Mo-
derna, an American biotech firm.
Moderna says its offering is 94.5% ef-
fective. Pfizer says the efficacy of its is 95%.
Moderna’s figure is an estimate based on a
peek at data being gathered in a continuing
trial involving 30,000 volunteers. Pfizer’s
comes from the final analysis of a trial in-
volving 43,000 people, in which 170 cases
of covid-19 were seen. Of these, 162 were in
the placebo arm (ie, those involved had re-
ceived dummy injections).
The news bodes well for a third candi-
date, from AstraZeneca and Oxford Univer-
sity. This pair have, rather notably, not re-
leased any interim data from their trials so
far. They have also been vaguer about when
their vaccine might be available, saying
only, “the end of the year”. But it is thought
their trials are only weeks away from hav-
ing a full set of data. Mene Pangalos, Astra-
Zeneca’s head of r&d, told the Greenwich
Economic Forum, a conference held last
week, that the firm might apply for full ap-
proval—rather than the emergency autho-
risation sought by the other two pro-
jects—in America, and perhaps in Britain
and other parts of Europe as well.
More good news was to be found among
the details of how, and for whom, these
vaccines work. All the severe cases of covid
were seen in unvaccinated volunteers. It is
also now clear that the vaccines worked in
participants of a range of ages, including
those over 65, and from a variety of ethnic
backgrounds. This means both vaccines

Another new vaccine arrives, and a
new class of drugs is born

Covid-19 vaccines

And then there


were two

Free download pdf