37
VIDEO GAMES
Swing and
a miss
PlayStation’s new Spider-
Man: Miles Morales game
was uniquely positioned
to respond to our current
moment. Instead, its
creator Insomniac bends
over backward to avoid
any nuanced conversation
about racism in policing.
While there’s lots to love,
like the thrill of swinging
through a gorgeously
rendered New York, players
will notice that police are
largely missing from the
crime-fighting game.
Miles, a Black–Puerto
Rican Spider-Man and
son of a cop, may have
complicated feelings about
criminal justice. But we
never hear them. At one
point, private security
guards aim to kill Miles,
even as he puts his hands
up; passersby pull out their
phones to film. But since
the men with the guns are
masked corporate stooges,
not police officers, the
moment loses its power.
Even more so than
books and film, video
games literally put players
in characters’ shoes, which
should help build empathy.
Insomniac rendered a
realistic city. The next step
should have been credibly
depicting Miles’ specific
point of view on the urgent
matters of the day.
—Eliana Dockterman
Miles Morales is Spider-Man
in the new PlayStation game
For Four years,
Donald J. Trump has
kept both U.S. foes
and allies off-balance
with his “America
first” approach to
global politics. For
a world that had grown accustomed
to the U.S. as rule-maker rather than
rule-breaker of the international order,
Trump’s embrace of “What have you
done for us lately?” international
relations was understandably jarring. But
it also served to open up new frontiers
in U.S. foreign policy. Only
someone with Trump’s
disregard for protocol could
have engaged the North
Koreans as quickly as he did;
only someone with Trump’s
willingness to bring military
and economic power quickly
to bear could so quickly
reshape the power balance of
the Middle East in Israel’s—
and, by extension, the
U.S.’s—favor.
There’s an argument to be made
for employing Trump’s approach—
unilateral, tactical, and much more
likely to use U.S. power in short and
limited durations—in our increasingly
“G-Zero” world, one lacking in global
leadership. In such a dysfunctional
world, securing gains whenever you
can get them and moving on to the next
challenge hold appeal. Trump will leave
office on Jan. 20 with more foreign
policy wins than his critics will want to
give him credit for precisely because of
this approach. He will also leave office
having failed to fundamentally address
critical long-term challenges facing the
U.S., such as the rise of China and the
enduring threat of climate change.
President-elect Joe Biden’s return
to Washington also marks a return to
more traditional foreign policy, one
that lines up with Biden’s own personal
orientation: multi lateral, strategic and
much more hesitant to use U.S. military
power when push comes to shove, even
when the U.S. holds the asymmetrical
advantage. For challenges like climate
and China—multifaceted, complex, with
spillover across all sectors of society—a
concerted effort among like-minded
allies is needed, making the consensus-
building Biden a U.S. President better
suited to lead the charge. But that
hesitancy to use U.S. power means that
the U.S. is unlikely to reap the same
type of short-term rewards it did under
Trump; it’s also worth noting that there’s
never been a more difficult time since
the end of World War II to be an avowed
multilateralist.
Not that it is all bad
news for Biden on the
international front; following
Trump as President means
that Biden gets to continue
drawing down U.S. troops in
Afghanistan and Iraq with
minimal political blowback
at home. It also means he can
continue pushing China with
more sanctions, all while couching his
actions in more traditional diplomatic
speak and bringing U.S. allies on board
in the process. That return to diplomatic
normalcy alone will yield dividends
for Biden—expect to hear from
dozens of supportive allies in coming
months as a Biden-led US reaffirms its
commitments to the U.N., NATO, the
Paris Agreement and the World Health
Organization.
But when it comes to the big global
issues, Biden is about to discover
firsthand that he is dealing with the
same world Trump is—one in which
the appetite for global cooperation
is limited. That was fine for Trump,
because he was never inclined to go
that route in any case, relying on U.S.
military and economic might to power
through his preferred outcomes. But
for a President Biden who values
international coordination and
cooperation, that poses a unique and
existential challenge. He now gets four
years to figure it out.
THE RISK REPORT
Biden faces a world that will be
wary of U.S. leadership
By Ian Bremmer
Biden is
about to
discover
firsthand he
is dealing
with the
same world
Trump is