Times 2 - UK (2020-11-26)

(Antfer) #1

the times | Thursday November 26 2020 1GT 9


arts


trade body for composers, “There’s
plenty of money being made from
music. It’s just not going to the
musicians.” Hunt was the singer with
the 1990s band Longpigs. He has
worked out that, thanks to the terms
of his ancient contract, he gets about
3 per cent of every penny Longpigs
earn from streaming; 1.2 billion
streams will make him £1. “We’re
dealing with an old world model in
a new world market,” he says.
There are signs of hope. “We have
a morally responsible younger
generation,” Garvey points out.
“Given the opportunity to pay the
artists they listen to, to switch to
a platform that properly supported
the audience they loved, surely they
would do that.” Garvey is pushing for
streaming to convert to a model of
equitable remuneration, so money
going to everyone who contributes
to a recording. Hunt is pushing for
a user-centric model, with streaming
recognised as a substitute for radio. If
an algorithm picks your music, there
should be payments for songwriters
and performers made through
collecting societies, as there is with
radio. The committee is yet to hear
from streaming providers and labels.
Spotify should also charge more.
Its £9.99 Premium monthly fee has
remained the same for ten years. The
artist-focused platform Bandcamp
offers fans a chance to download
albums by their favourite artist and it
generated $5 million to those artists
over the past year, a fraction
compared with Spotify, but a lifeline.
“Streaming is nearly a miracle. It
just needs to pay fairly,” Garvey says.
“Musicians don’t want to admit they’re
skint, and they’re not good at this stuff
because they are dreamers whose
heads are elsewhere, but if more
tweeted, ‘I can no longer make the
rent,’ their listeners would support
them. I don’t want anyone in the
stocks. I’m not asking for Robert
Plant’s third limousine. I just want
the system to be fixed.”

wanted to kill anyone it
would be Jonathan, and
why is he bankrolling
the most expensive and
ruthless lawyer in town to
defend him?
The dark horse in all this
is the kind lawyer Sylvia
Steinitz — paradoxically
the only prominent blond-
haired person in the cast.
Jonathan says he has been
unfaithful with someone
else besides Elena. Sylvia is
surely a candidate for that.
A mum at the school, she
gave Jonathan legal advice
when his hospital was firing
him for his affair with a
patient’s mother, something
she took her time sharing
with Grace. Now she
ghoulishly turns up at court
for his trial. Yet if she loved
Jonathan and was consumed
by jealousy of Elena, why is
she best buddies with his
primary bedmate, Grace? It
could be her, but the
motivation is shallow.
So who does that leave?
Grace! CCTV placed her
a block away from Elena’s
studio at the time of her killing and
she has properly traditional motives
for slaying her husband’s girlfriend.
Even if she did not know of their
affair, we know that she had sexual
feelings for Elena herself. Could she
have followed her home after the
fundraiser, attempted to seduce her,
then gone berserk when Elena
revealed whom she really fancied?
However, over five episodes Grace
has seemed astonished, hurt and
terrified at every plot turn. She doesn’t
seem to know who killed Elena. That
could be the point, however. She may
be good professionally at sorting out
other people’s marriages, but how
much does she know herself? This
brilliant psychotherapist did not spot
that her husband was a psycho, nor
did she realise her adored father was
repeatedly unfaithful in his troubled
marriage to her late mother. What
I believe we have here is a divided,
repressed personality who is capable
of suppressing not only her feelings
but how she acted on them. She will
not have even realised that she has
tried to frame her son by placing her
murder weapon in his violin case.
Kidman is ideally placed to pull this
off; she plays Grace brilliantly as
emotionally fluent, but unknowable.
The answer to the mystery may lie
in The Undoing’s opening titles, in
which we see, through a misty
montage, scenes from Grace’s idealised
but solitary infancy. The little girl with
the blood-red Medusa locks half-
glimpses reality through a net curtain,
gazes at a tinselly snow globe, then
directs her gaze above the world to
the sky, the trees and the birds.
The titles’ central motif is of little
Grace playing with bubbles — the
bubble, of course, of her family’s
privilege, but also of the mental world
she creates for herself. Perhaps she has
been the victim of past trauma — her
mother’s death, abuse by her father —
but she is living a fantasy of marital
perfection. At the end of the sequence,
which is accompanied by Kidman’s
rendition of Dream a Little Dream of
Me, a soap bubble bursts. And whose
dangerous little finger bursts it?
Grace’s, of course.
The Undoing concludes on
Sky Atlantic on Monday

he has motive. His wife was not only


cheating on him, but has left him


with another man’s baby. He is young


enough and strong enough to carry


out the frenzied attack. His alibi


is probably capable of being


deconstructed. Yet his performance on


the witness stand in court on Monday


was surely that of a man bereaved of


someone he genuinely loved and


outraged that he could be accused of


her murder. And really? The wronged


husband? It would be just too boring.


What about Henry Fraser, Jonathan


and Grace’s violin-playing son? He is


obviously screwed up and we now


know that he inferred from a tête-à-


tête between his father and Elena at


the school gates that the two were


having an affair. At the end of Monday


night’s episode his mother had found


in the lad’s violin case the hammer


that presumably killed Elena. It would


not be the first time a child has done


such deeds. Baby Maggie was the


culprit in the Simpsons episode Who


Shot Mr Burns?. EastEnders divulged


that little Bobby Beale had killed Lucy.


So why don’t I believe it this time?


Because that is what Kelley wanted


us to think by placing the hammer


discovery at the end of the


penultimate episode. Don’t buy it.


So perhaps it is Franklin Reinhardt,


Grace’s insanely rich father whose love


of great art and great music must


surely rule him in, Hannibal Lecter-


style. Franklin is played by 85-year-old


Donald Sutherland, but while he is too


old to be doing much bludgeoning


himself, he has the money to spend on


a bespoke murder contract. He has


always hated Jonathan as much as


he has adored Grace, and would be


outraged at his affair. What is more, it


is a TV thriller trope that the crime is


committed by the most distinguished


supporting actor in the cast. Yet


although Sutherland carries the most


lethally pointed eyebrows on TV and


can reduce a headmaster to a grade-


sixer being threatened with detention,


how much sense would it make? If he


Above: Matilda
De Angelis. Left:
Hugh Grant and
Nicole Kidman

‘Musicians can’t eat or pay the rent’


Guy Garvey talks to Will Hodgkinson


about the music streaming scandal


S


he has been nominated for
a Mercury prize, made a
series of acclaimed albums,
and sold out the 1,700-
capacity Roundhouse in
London. Yet the Newcastle
singer Nadine Shah told
parliament yesterday that
in a year of no gigs her revenue from
streaming is not enough to “keep the
wolf from the door”. And Shah, who
was joined by the Elbow singer Guy
Garvey, the Radiohead guitarist Ed
O’Brien and Tom Gray of Gomez to
give evidence before the culture select
committee on the economic impact of
streaming, is not alone. The classical
violinist Tasmin Little reports that for
more than five million Spotify streams
from albums she recorded in the 1990s
she earned £12.34.
“I don’t think labels realise how
serious it has got,” says Garvey, who
is also a presenter on BBC Radio 6
Music. “It is the speed of the land grab,
the streaming technology becoming
available so quickly, which has
created a bad business model.
Streaming favours young solo
artists, and even they aren’t happy.”
Streaming platforms pay out
roughly 60 to 70 per cent of their
annual revenue to rights holders,
a group that includes musicians,
record labels, publishers and
songwriters. In a recent letter to
shareholders, Spotify projected a
total revenue of between $9 billion
and $9.5 billion; about $6 billion to
rights holders. That is then divided
between artists and labels according
to their market share. It sounds
good, until you realise this favours
those with bigger streaming
percentages. That means the £9.99 a
month you pay to listen to a favourite
artist doesn’t necessarily go to them.
Your pay is not based on how well
you do, but on how well everyone else
does. The better they do, the less you
get. Spotify’s average going rate is
about $0.00437 per play. It means
Shape of You, the most-streamed track
of the decade at 2.3 billion plays, has
made Ed Sheeran about $14.6 million.
Tasmin Little has a small streaming
percentage by comparison, hence her
piddling amount earned from streams.
Amid the collapse in physical sales,
streaming has been a saviour for the
industry, but the system is riddled with
problems. Spotify recently introduced
a feature in which artists could get
an algorithmic boost on playlists in
exchange for a lowered royalty rate.
“A band is the most difficult thing to
be in this era,” Garvey says. “How the
hell do Radiohead or Elbow pay five
people through streaming? We won’t
have bands like that again under these
conditions. I was speaking to Ed
O’Brien about this and he said that,
even though Radiohead released [their
2007 album] In Rainbows themselves,
they kind of liked being on a label. It
made them feel less lonely. This is not
about throwing stones at the big bad
moneymen at the majors. This is
about: musicians can’t eat, they can’t
make the rent. ”
According to Crispin Hunt, the
chairman of the Ivors Academy, the

w
w
w
th
r
d

is
S
th
h J u e s A g w h p s w g

fo
J b s p c m G a

The Victim


Streaming


is nearly


a miracle


— but it


needs to


pay fairly


t p m m t w o 3 e s d a a g “


From top: Guy Garvey
of Elbow; Tasmin Little
Free download pdf