Part One 161
Here’s an example of an endless repeating decimal:
43/99= 0.43434343...
Here, the digit sequence 43 repeats forever. We can repeatedly write down the digit pair 43 to
the right of the decimal point, keeping at it for hours, days, or years; but the resulting decimal
expression never reaches the precise value of 43/99. Now let’s look at an example of an endless
nonrepeating decimal:
π= 3.14159265...
The digits go on forever, but there is no pattern to them. We can let a computer grind out
more and more digits, and the resulting decimal expression approaches (but never quite
reaches) the exact value of π.
Question 7-5
How can we convert 356.0056034 into the sum of a whole number and a fraction?
Answer 7-5
We look to the left of the decimal point first. The entire string of numbers here is the integer
- Now we look to the right of the point. There are seven digits. That means the denomina-
tor of the fraction should be 10^7 or 10,000,000, and the numerator should be the entire string
of digits after the decimal point. We get
0056034/10,000,000
for the fractional part. The ciphers at the left in the numerator are useless in the fractional
notation, so we can take them out and add a comma to the digits that remain, getting
56,034/10,000,000
The entire number is the sum of the integer part and the fractional part:
356 + 56,034/10,000,000
Question 7-6
When a number is written in decimal form, is the fractional equivalent (in 10ths, 100ths,
1,000ths, or whatever) in lowest terms?
Answer 7-6
Sometimes, but usually not. Consider 0.55, which converts to 55/100. This is not a fraction
in lowest terms, because it can be reduced to 11/20. But 0.23 converts to 23/100. This is in
lowest terms.
Question 7-7
How can we write down the fractions 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ..., 1/10 as decimal expressions?