Now we can substitute (4x+ 2) for y in the first original equation, obtaining
3 x−π(4x+ 2) =− 1
When we apply the distributive law on the left side of the equals sign, we get
3 x− (4πx+ 2 π)=− 1
This is the equivalent of
3 x+ [−1(4πx+ 2 π)]=− 1
which simplifies to
3 x− 4 πx− 2 π=− 1
When we add 2π to each side, we get
3 x− 4 πx=− 1 + 2 π
We can use the distributive law “backward” to morph the left side of this equation, obtaining
(3− 4 π)x=− 1 + 2 π
Now we can divide through by (3 − 4 π) to get
x= (− 1 + 2 π)/(3− 4 π)
It’s a mess, all right! But we’ve found a real number that’s equal to x. We can plug this number into the SI
equation we derived earlier, getting
y= 4[(− 1 + 2 π)/(3− 4 π)]+ 2
= (− 4 + 8 π)/(3− 4 π)+ 2
Believe it or not, this can be simplified. But we must take a step back, and then we can take two steps for-
ward. Let’s “complexify” the number 2 and write it as twice the denominator in the fraction above, divided
by that denominator. The idea is to get a common denominator, add some fractions, and get a simpler
expression as a result. In mathematical terms,
2 = 2(3 − 4 π)/(3− 4 π)
It takes some intuition to see, in advance, how a scheme like this will work. (With practice, you’ll develop
this “sixth sense.”) Our solution for y can now be rewritten as
y= (− 4 + 8 π)/(3− 4 π)+ 2(3 − 4 π)/(3− 4 π)
This gives us a sum of two fractions with the common denominator (3 − 4 π). Therefore:
y= [(− 4 + 8 π)+ 2(3 − 4 π)]/(3− 4 π)
Rename and Replace 261