60 Addition and Subtraction
This works whether the numbers are positive, negative, or 0. It also works if there are four or
more numbers in a sum.
It fails when you subtract
In subtraction, the grouping does matter. It’s easy to see why you can’t apply the associative law
to subtraction and get away with it. Consider this:
(3 − 5) − 7 =− 2 − 7 =− 9
but
3 − (5 − 7) = 3 − (−2)
= 3 + 2 = 5
In formal terms, we would say that for any three integers a, b, and c,it is not always true that
(a−b)−c=a− (b−c)
The associative law hardly ever works with subtraction.
Mixing the signs
How about mixed addition and subtraction? Let’s try it with some integers.
(3 + 5) − 7 = 8 − 7 = 1
and
3 + (5 − 7) = 3 + (−2)= 1
It works in this case. What happens if we switch the positions of the signs?
(3 − 5) + 7 =− 2 + 7 = 5
but
3 − (5 + 7) = 3 − 12 =− 9
This time, it fails! Now we know that with mixed signs, the associative law sometimes works,
but not always. If something is to be called a law in mathematics, “sometimes” does not suf-
fice. “Usually” won’t do the job either. Even “almost always” is not good enough. In order to
be a law, something has to work all the time.
It’s easy to prove that a law does not hold in every possible case. You only have to find one
case where it fails, called a counterexample, to show that something can’t be called a law. Prov-
ing that a law always works is more difficult. You can’t do it using specific integers, because
you’d have to try an infinite number of cases one at a time. You have to use airtight logic.
That’s what proofs are all about.