A History of American Literature

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1
242 Reconstructing, Reimagining: 1865–1900

and anchorless, doomed to a “shiftless,” unprotected life as a result. “Dem wuz good
ole time marster – de bes’ Sam ever see!” one such character declares in “Marse
Chan: A Tale of Old Virginia” (1889) by Thomas Nelson Page. He then goes on to
celebrate the old, slave South in this way:

Nigger didn’ had nuthin’t all to do – jes’ had to ten’ to de feedin’ an’ cleanin’ de hosses
an’ doin’ what de marster tell ’em to do, an’ when dey wuz sick ... de same doctor came
to see ’em what ’ten de white folks. ... Dyer warn’ no trouble nor nothin.

It is worth remembering that Page was equally popular outside the South as inside
it – he had to be, given the virtual disappearance of the publishing industry in his
own region after the Civil War. He, Allen, and Harris were describing a lost world
that many way beyond the boundaries of their own region found attractive.
Other areas of old Southern life also became the subject of similar narrative
indulgence. Southwestern humor, for example, took a nostalgic turn among some
writers. So, Richard Malcolm Johnston (1822–1898) set his tales, gathered together
in Dukesborough Tales (1871), in what he called “the Grim and Rude, but Hearty Old
Times in Georgia.” “It is a grateful solace,” he admitted, “to recall persons whose
simplicity has been much changed by subsequent Conditions, chiefly the Confederate
War.” The growth of towns and factories, Johnston explained, had served to dimin-
ish “rustic individualities”; and his aim was to recover the habits of a simpler, more
relaxed and rambunctious world. Other writers of the time found similar simplicity
in the remoteness of the Southern mountains. In the later nineteenth century, the
Southern Appalachians and the Ozarks were opened up by the mining and tourist
industries; and, to many visitors from the lowlands, the Southern highlands offered
the appealing vision of the romance of the past preserved in the reality of the present.
The folk of the Southern mountains were, one commentator insisted, “our contem-
porary ancestors,” recalling the character and customs of an earlier America. For
Mary Noailles Murfree (1850–1922), what appealed in particular were the breath-
taking scenery and simple home surroundings of mountain life, the idiosyncratic,
antique language of the mountaineers, and the homely customs and odd, illogical
beliefs of mountain society. In eleven volumes of stories, beginning with In the
Tennessee Mountains (1884), she emphasized the strangeness as well as the simplicity
of her highland characters: “awkward young mountaineers,” romantic mountain
heroines with eyes like “limpid mountain streams,” weary but defiant and stoical
older people – and “a hospitality that meets a stranger on the threshold of every hut,
presses upon him, ungrudgingly, its best.” Murfree approached her fictional subjects
with the tendencies of a romantic antiquarian or romantically inclined tourist.
Another, immensely popular writer of the time who chose the same subject, John
Fox, Jr. (1862–1919), took an approach that, if anything, was even more attached to
a sentimental vision of the highlands. This he then wedded to the sensational. In
books like A Cumberland Vendetta (1896), The Kentuckians (1898), and The Trail
of the Lonesome Pines (1908), Fox paid homage to what he saw as the ancient,
unsullied character of the mountain blood line and language. For him, as he put it

GGray_c03.indd 242ray_c 03 .indd 242 8 8/1/2011 7:54:19 AM/ 1 / 2011 7 : 54 : 19 AM

Free download pdf