Times 2 - UK (2020-12-02)

(Antfer) #1

4 1GT Wednesday December 2 2020 | the times


fashion


Would the fashion icon approve of


a slouchy look, asks Anna Murphy


Mon Dieu! Dior moves


into loungewear


I


t’s a sign of the times
that Dior’s new
collection is the first
in the 74-year history
of the house to be
dedicated to loungewear.
It goes by the name of
Dior Chez Moi — basically
Diorspeak for being stuck
at home, retooled with
typical Franco-alchemy. It
was — the website tells us
— designed by Maria Grazia
Chiuri, Dior’s creative
director, during “the
confinement period”. Again,
doesn’t that immediately
sound more romantic,
more Résistance, than
mere lockdown?
It’s very gorgeous, much
of it covered in an intricate
toile du jouy or zodiac print.
Suffice it to say, if you need to
ask the price, you can’t afford
it (pyjama pants, £1,150, and
jacket, £1,300, dior.com). What
would Monsieur Dior — who
saw women’s bodies as cheese
to be pared — make of all this
slouchy-looking stuff? Surely
he would be horrified that the
brand he built not so much on
tailoring as on sculpting now
puts its name to daywear
pyjamas and a hoodie
sweatshirt? Even his fabled bar
jacket — as debuted in the
New Look of 1947 — has been
reworked in striped ribbed
cotton, the better to be comfy as well
as fabulous. Introducing the bar-digan.
Actually, I think he would be just
fine with it. Christian Dior was an
innovator in business, as well as a style
visionary. Among other commercial
move-ons, he created a diffusion line,
CD models, based in London, which
produced high-end ready-to-wear
versions of his couture version, sold
via Harrods and Kendal Milne in
Manchester. (All well and good until
British women turned up in Paris
wearing facsimiles of pieces that
his French couture clients thought
were one-offs.) He also went into
partnership with a range of British
brands to produce corsetry, costume
jewellery, shoes and fabrics. Would
he balk at the Dior Chez Moi
bralette? Mais non.
In truth, the new collection is a
corralling of the sort of pieces Grazia
Chiuri has been designing since she
arrived at the house four years ago.
For every evening gown she has
conjured up — and she does fairytale
as well as her great antecedent — she
will put in a pair of jeans or a parka.
It has earnt her criticism from some
of the sniffier members of the front
row for producing mere “clothes”, a
statement that’s preposterous enough
even before you factor in that these
same critics dress in what might
generously be described as normcore.
She believes in creating clothes that
women would actually wear — or, in
truth, for most of us, dream of being

able to afford to wear. “To be
creative and wearable,” she
said to me when we spoke last
week, “that is what I work to
achieve.” This was underlined
at the Dior exhibition at the
Victoria and Albert Museum
last year, when her outfits —
a wardrobe in waiting — were
placed cheek by jowl with
the theatrical costumes of
John Galliano.
Grazia Chiuri went on
to tell me how her own
lockdown — sorry,
confinement — had
reminded her of “how
important it can be to see, to
feel your best self when you
are alone”. I have certainly
been reappraised of similar
this year, much more jolly
when I have made some
effort, as opposed to none.
“My clothes are a kind
of house for my body,” she
continued, “and they have
to feel like the right space
for me to reside in. To
be uncomfortable is so
outdated. I always want
freedom of movement,
of attitude.” Hear, hear.
Especially when you
can’t go out much.

Slipping into something
very cool
Fashion types like to talk about
things such as “a coat wardrobe”, for
which read several different coats.
I used to consider the coat wardrobe
a nonsense. But, having always bought
for the ultra long-term, and with an
eye to distinctiveness, I now — after
many years — find myself with an
approximation of one. And a very big
fan of it I am becoming, in that I can
pick a coat to match — or tweak —
my mood. A great coat can make even
a trip to the supermarket exciting.
Which, right now, is lucky.
Food shopping aside, most of us
have spent most of our time at home
in recent months. Which is why I am
on the verge of developing another
variety of wardrobe, a slipper
wardrobe. I know! Ridiculous, right?
Well, no. Not when you consider price
per wear. My beloved old Celtic & Co
pair must be registering at a fractional
of a penny per outing, or — to be
more accurate — inning. And, much
as I still love them, I can’t deny that
wearing exactly the same thing on
my feet day in day out is a bit,
well, samey.
So it feels like destiny that Laidback
London, one of my favourite boutique
British footwear brands, has
introduced a slipper range. Given that
Laidback’s signature suede moccasin
boots are themselves almost as
comfortable as slippers, it was only
a matter of time. My pick are the
leopard-print ones, needless to say
(£95, laidbacklondon.com).
Instagram: @annagmurphy

I always


want


freedom of


movement,


of attitude


Top: Dior’s pyjamas.
Above: slippers, £95,
laidbacklondon.com

a c s w a a V


la
a
p
t
J

t
lo
c
r
im
fe
a b t w e o c t f b o

fr
o
E
c

S
v
Fashiontype

We’ll all be in


the kitchen


at parties


This year we have five days to join


bubbles for Christmas together — so


what will you wear, asks Anna Murphy


W


e have now
been made
cognisant of
the fact that
we will be
allowed five
days of it:
Christmas
as we sort of know it, that is. So —
conscientious fashion director that
I am — I immediately think, which
five outfits? Which is, in turn, focusing
my mind on what might be the more

general do’s and don’ts of festive
dressing this year.
Because we aren’t going to be going
to parties, obviously, unless you have
the wherewithal to whip up what
passes for a jamboree out of your
bubble of three households. (In which
case, I can’t even begin to address how
jealous I am.)
Indeed, we aren’t going to be going
anywhere much. Which is precisely
why it’s more important than ever to
have fun, even if it has to be conjured

Dress, £150 (kitristudio.com)

Free download pdf