Student Writing Handbook Fifth+Edition

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1

114 / Methods of Development


decide to change the organization slightly as you write, but the outline will serve as a
reminder of where you have been and where you must go with the arguments.


STEP 7: Writing—Getting the Arguments on Paper


Use the prewriting notes and outline developed above to write your persuasive para-
graph or paper. Strive to include logical and emotional appeals in proper balance
and to maintain your own credibility.


STEP 8: Revising—Analyzing the Content


As you think through your first draft, ask yourself questions to pinpoint possible
weaknesses:



  • Is my subject appropriately debatable and therefore suitable for a persuasive
    paper?

  • Does the paper begin on some common ground so that the reader and I start
    with a point of agreement?

  • Have I included a clear topic or thesis statement, either at the beginning or at
    the end?

  • Have I followed an appropriate plan determined by the reader’s probable
    antagonism?

  • Is the organization clear? In a multi-paragraph paper, have I developed a single
    argument in each paragraph? Does each paragraph have a topic sentence,
    supporting details, and a conclusion? Have I used suitable transitions both
    within and between paragraphs to move from one argument to another
    or from the opposing view to my own? [See Chapter 3, Revising, Checking
    Structure and Sample Revision for Transition.]

  • Is the content easy to follow with clear, concise sentences? Are the sentences
    developed with the main ideas in the main clauses and the subordinating
    ideas in the subordinate clauses? [See Chapter 3, Revising, Sample Revision for
    Emphasis and Sample Revision for Sentence Variety.]

  • Are the supporting arguments logical? Have I included facts, statistics,
    examples, or other supporting details to develop the arguments? [See Chapter 3,
    Revising, Sample Revision for Specific Detail.]

  • Have I refuted the major opposing arguments and responded with additional
    supporting arguments? Have I dealt with the major arguments and eliminated
    from my paper unimportant, even petty ones?

  • Is the tone appropriate to the subject? [See tone in the Glossary.]

  • Have I carefully balanced the logical appeals with the more subtle emotional
    appeals?

Free download pdf