The Wall Street Journal - USA (2020-12-03)

(Antfer) #1

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. Thursday, December 3, 2020 |B11


A V-Shaped Recovery


Doesn’t Mean Jobs


Global manufacturing’s recovery
continues to gain traction, with
J.P. Morgan’s global manufacturing
purchasing managers index hitting
53.7 last month, the highest in al-
most three years.
But the employment portion of
that index has only just returned
to growth, and incredibly narrowly
so at a reading of 50.1. Readings
above 50 indicate expansion
month over month. That weakness
tells us something of concern
about the sort of recession the
world plunged into, and the shape
of the recovery so far.
The current global downturn is
very different to the 2008-09 finan-
cial crisis, as well as most others
historically. In short, in a normal re-
cession, manufacturing underper-
forms services, which are more re-
silient to the collapse in demand.
That hasn’t been true in this
case. Social-distancing restrictions
are far more of a limiting factor to
someone selling, say, concert tick-
ets than they are to someone sell-
ing exercise bikes. Services crashed
harder than manufacturing but re-
covered no more quickly—slightly
slower, if anything.
Moreover a lot of manufactur-
ing, particularly in the Western
world, isn’t as labor intensive as it
once was. In many cases, produc-
tion can grow considerably with-
out a surge in jobs. The same isn’t
true of food services, or even a lot
of white-collar work such as busi-
ness services.
So the portion of the economy
that is recovering quickly isn’t


likely to generate a lot of new em-
ployment opportunities—certainly
not as many as the economy will
need to recover.
A services-dominated recession
is something of an unknown entity.
Research by economists Martha L.
Olney and Aaron Pacitti suggests
the growth of the services sector
in the U.S. at the expense of manu-
facturing has made labor-market
recoveries slower. That is in part
because manufacturers can con-
tinue production in anticipation of
a demand recovery. Many services
providers can’t.
The U.S. labor market has re-
covered from the double-digit un-
employment rates seen this year,
with unemployment now back to
6.9%. But that isn’t the only issue:
The proportion of people actually
in the U.S. labor force—employed
or looking for work—fell by 3 per-
centage points as the crisis hit.
That has recovered about halfway,
but even the recovery leaves par-
ticipation in 2020 overall at its
lowest levels since the late 1970s.
And unemployment rates in many
other advanced economies are
suppressed by continuing furlough
schemes.
There is still a huge amount
that we don’t know about the re-
covery from this downturn, pre-
cisely because it is so unusual. But
at this point it is clear that the
sector really leading the bounce
back won’t provide many jobs it-
self, which may prove a drag on la-
bor markets around the world.
—Mike Bird

Consumers are eating upDoor-
Dash’s DashPass while seemingly
nibbling at offers from rivals
Grubhuband Uber Eats by com-
parison. That could prove to be
the secret sauce for DoorDash
once a pandemic-driven wave of
business shrinks.
Other food-delivery subscrip-
tions cost about the same and of-
fer similar benefits. They are a
good value for frequent users: A
$9.99 subscription pays for itself if
ordering food delivery just a few
times every month. So, in a year in
which demand for food delivery
soared, why aren’t all subscription
programs prospering equally?
From August 2018 to August
2019, DoorDash said its program
added over one million subscribers
in its first year available. That
number ballooned to over five mil-
lion subscribers as of Sept. 30,
2020, according to DoorDash’s ini-
tial public offering filing. About
28% of DoorDash’s more than 18
million users are now considered
monthly subscribers. By contrast,
Uber Technologiessaid in its
third-quarter report that it had
just surpassed the one million sub-
scriber mark for its Uber Pass and
Eats Pass programs even as the
company had 78 million monthly
active platform users across Rides
and Eats. Grubhub doesn’t release
figures, but it is believed to have
fewer subscribers than DoorDash.
A big part of DoorDash’s advan-

tage might simply be that it began
its subscription offering earlier.
Grubhub+, for example, was
launched February of this year,
while Uber’s Eats Pass was
launched broadly across the U.S. in
November 2019.
DoorDash’s early focus on cus-
tomer loyalty seems to have
played a role in its transformation
from a delivery upstart to the U.S.
market leader. So has cornering
the suburban markets, which have
proven to be a pandemic gold
mine with higher order values and
lower operating costs in many
cases. But customer allegiance
could become even more of a fac-
tor next year when consumers be-
gin to venture back out to restau-
rants.
While some of its allure may
persist, it is likely delivery con-
sumption will eventually moderate.
That means the next several
months could be important for de-
livery platforms to add subscrib-
ers. As evidence of this urgency,
all three delivery platforms are
now offering free subscriptions to
consumers through select partners
such as Chase, American Express
and Lyft, good for various time pe-
riods.
It is a good time to drum up in-
terest. With in-person dining ex-
pected to eat into growth next
year, DoorDash seems to have
hooked eaters just in time.
—Laura Forman

Driverless cars are moving out
of science fiction and onto U.S.
roads. But this is just the start of a
long journey before the vehicles
fulfill their transformative poten-
tial.
Signs of very early-stage com-
mercialization are emerging from
the corporate science projects that
want to remove human drivers
from vehicles.Alphabet’s Waymo
seems furthest ahead with its “ro-
botaxi” project in the suburbs of
Phoenix. Customers used to have
to sign a nondisclosure agreement
to hail a ride with no backup
driver, but Waymo opened the ser-
vice up in October.
Others aren’t far behind. Mo-
tional, a $4 billion joint venture
between South Korean car giant
Hyundaiand automotive supplier


HEARD


ON


THE


STREET


FINANCIAL ANALYSIS & COMMENTARY


Driverless Cars


Are Coming, but


Won’t Take Over


Autonomous taxi projects start to remove backup
drivers, an important but very early milestone

DoorDash’s


Loyalty Program


Should Deliver


An air-conditioner production line at a Haier factory in Wuhan, China.


AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES

OVERHEARD


Count daytime television as
one of the pandemic’s winners.
The audience for work-hours
TV has shifted, however.
Ratings and research firm
Nielsen reports that daytime
has become “a second prime
time” for what were once
called “office professionals and
managers.” In October, from 9
a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday to Fri-
day, these white-collar couch
potatoes on average increased
their viewing time by two
hours and 10 minutes com-
pared with a year earlier.
This is even more significant
because it is a different audi-
ence than the typical daytime
TV crowd, and one with much
higher spending power. “That
means content creators, net-
works and marketers should be
actively thinking about making
adjustments to ensure that
their efforts are seen and
heard when engagement is
high,” Nielsen says.
A vaccine is coming, but not
soon enough to rip these
home-office warriors from the
tube. “The established new
routines of consumers, the
colder winter months and in-
creased movement restrictions
will further solidify daytime TV
as a true work companion,”
Nielsen argues.
In short, while stuck at
home this winter, expect more
ads for luxury cars and fewer
for reverse mortgages and
catheters.

Total world-wide number of merchants
available on each delivery platform

Source: the companies

Note: Merchant numbers are approximates. Not all merchants on each platform are available through companies'
subscription services. DoorDash’s merchants include verticals other than restaurants like grocery.

300,000


Grubhub

390,000


DoorDash

500,000


Uber Eats

Aptiv, said last month that it will
take safety drivers out of its test
vehicles in Nevada “in the coming
months.” Cruise Automation, the
driverless-car business controlled
byGeneral Motors, has said it
would remove backup drivers from
its test cars in California by year-
end.
Doing without safety drivers is
an important milestone, but there
are plenty more.
Once companies have worked
out how to operate robotaxis
safely in one urban district in good
weather, they will need to adapt to
new areas and a wider range of
conditions.
Eventually, this kind of gradual
expansion should give driverless
cars the scale necessary to drive
down costs and compete with hu-
man-driven taxis, public transport
and, in the very long run, car own-
ership.
Such lofty end goals hint at the
huge business opportunities and
threats that have drawn tech gi-
ants, the auto industry and “mobil-
ity” providers such asUberall
into the race. For a technology
that needs the highest safety stan-
dards to secure regulatory and
public support, though, the rollout
will take years, all the while con-
suming billions of dollars in capi-
tal.
Karl Iagnemma, chief executive
of Motional, pegs the price of an
entry ticket into the driverless-car
contest at roughly $1 billion. That
buys the necessary teams, compo-
nents development and a test

fleet, among other startup costs.
Much more will be needed to roll
out customer-ready fleets on a
commercial scale.
One response to this funding
challenge has been partnerships.
HondaandSoftBankhave bought
minority stakes in GM’s Cruise Au-
tomation.FordandVolkswagen
are together fielding another chal-
lenger, Argo AI. Even Waymo has
raised venture capital from outside
Alphabet this year.
The other big tech company in-
volved isAmazon. Last year it
took a small stake inAurora Inno-
vation, the biggest independent
driverless-car startup, which is in
talks to take over Uber’s operation,
according to a TechCrunch report.
This summer Amazon paid $1.3
billion for Aurora’s cash-strapped
rivalZoox.
The e-commerce company’s
move highlights the case for driv-
erless goods transport, which has
grown louder during this year’s

pandemic. Larry Burns, a former
GM executive who advises Waymo,
expects the commercialization of
driverless technology to be driven
by freight rather than taxis, partly
because logistics is all about oper-
ating costs and stands to benefit
more directly from removing driv-
ers. Waymo, which was previously
laser-focused on robotaxis, in Oc-
tober announced a partnership
withDaimler Trucks, the largest
maker of big rigs.
Then there isTesla, which at
last year’s “autonomy day”
pledged to have one million robot-
axis on the road by the end of


  1. Elon Musk walked back that
    promise in April and said it might
    happen next year. The plan is
    vague, and it is hard to see luxury
    sedans as the best foundation for
    a mass ride-hailing operation.
    For investors, the question isn’t
    just how far driverless cars are
    along the road to commercial via-
    bility, but how stoked markets are.


After much excitement in 2016 and
2017 about their potential to shake
up transportation, a fatal crash in-
volving an Uber testing vehicle in
2018 acted as a sobering reminder
that the technology couldn’t be
hurried.
The removal of safety drivers,
assuming it doesn’t trigger more
crashes, could start to revive
hopes.
Although most driverless-car
ventures are, for good reason, part
of larger groups supported by
other cash flows, it doesn’t seem a
bad time to invest in companies
with a meaningful stake in their
success, such as Aptiv. The total
addressable markets are too vast
and the disruption story too se-
ductive to ignore.
As the hype rebuilds, just re-
member: Getting driverless taxis
to work in a sunny suburb in Ari-
zona doesn’t mean they are on the
cusp of taking over the world.
—Stephen Wilmot

Latest private-market valuation


Sources: the companies; Financial Times (Waymo, Aurora)


Waymo(March 2 020 )


Cruise Automation(May 2 019 )


Argo AI(July 2 020 )


Uber ATG(April 2 019 )


Motional(Sept. 2 019 )


Aurora Innovation(Feb. 2 019 )


Zoox(Aug. 2 020 )


$30 billion

19

7. 5

7. 3

4. 0

2. 5

1. 3

Whoopi Goldberg of ‘The View’

LOU ROCCO/WALT DISNEY TELEVISION

Alphabet’s Waymo seems furthest ahead with its ‘robotaxi’ project in the suburbs of Phoenix.

CAITLIN O’HARA/REUTERS
Free download pdf