Doc. 4.6,
Testimony in
the Trial of the
British Soldiers of
the nineteenth
regiment of Foot,
1770
Doc. 4.7,
“Account of
the Boston
Tea party,”
Massachusetts
Gazette,
1773
Doc. 4.8,
“Memory of a
British officer
Stationed at
lexington and
Concord,”
1775
Audience: Who did the
author have in mind
when she or he created
this source?
The judge and jury
Purpose: What is the
author’s intent in creat-
ing this source? What is
it for?
To relate event and
encourage support
for the Patriot cause
Point of view and
attitude: Which per-
spective(s) does the
author consider? What
are the author’s biases?
This British soldier
was at the Battle
of Lexington and
Concord and wants
to present a view
that is sympathetic
to soldiers.
Format: How has the
author presented her
or his source? Is it
handwritten, printed, a
picture or cartoon, or an
artifact?
Diary; handwritten
Argument: A source
often reflects a writer’s
argument. What might
this source be arguing
for?
That the British
soldiers were being
attacked by the mob
Context: What events,
ideas, and people
surrounded the author
when this source was
created? Where did the
source appear? How
credible is the source?
Growing conflicts
between the British
and Patriot col-
onists; the back-
ground included the
Stamp Act, Boston
Massacre, Tea Act,
Boston Tea Party,
Coercive Acts, etc.
Limitations: Based on
all of the above, what
are some limitations of
this source? What can it
not do or be because of
its audience, purpose,
point of view, etc.?
Biased in support of
Patriot cause; unable
to present both
sides of the debate
between the Patriots
and British
100 ChApTEr 4 | an atlantiC eMpire | period three 175 4 –18 0 0 TopIC I | Challenging an empire^101
05_STA_2012_ch4_085-114.indd 100 26/03/15 10:11 AM