270 Chapter 10 The Making of Middle-Class America
Tocqueville: Democracy in America
On May 12, 1831, two French aristocrats, Alexis
de Tocqueville and Gustave de Beaumont, arrived in
New York City from Le Havre. Their official purpose
was to make a study of American prisons for the French
government. But they really came, as Tocqueville
explained, “to see what a great republic is like.”
Tocqueville and Beaumont believed that
Europe was passing from its aristocratic past into a
democratic future. How better to prepare for the
change, they believed, than by studying the United
States, where democracy was already the “enduring
and normal state” of the land. The visit provided
the material for Tocqueville’s classic De la
Démocratie en Amérique, published in France in
1835 and a year later in an English translation.
Democracy in Americahas been the starting point
for virtually all subsequent writers who have tried to
describe what Tocqueville called “the creative ele-
ments” of American institutions.
The gist of Democracy in Americais contained in
the book’s first sentence: “No novelty in the United
States struck me more vividly during my stay there than
the equality of conditions.” Tocqueville meant not that
Americans lived in a state of total equality, but that the
inequalities that did exist among white Americans were
not enforced by institutions or supported by public
opinion. “In America,” he concluded, “men are nearer
equality than in any other country in the world.”
This sweeping generalization, however comfort-
ing to Americans then and since, is an oversimplifica-
tion. Few modern students of Jacksonian America
would accept it without qualification. In the 1830s
and 1840s a wide and growing gap existed between
the rich and poor in the eastern cities. According to
one study, the wealthiest 4 percent of the population
of New York controlled about half the city’s wealth
in 1828, about two-thirds in 1845. The number of
New Yorkers worth $100,000 or more tripled in that
period. A similar concentration of wealth was occur-
ring in Philadelphia and Boston.
Moreover, Tocqueville failed to observe the
many poor people in Jacksonian America.
Particularly in the cities, bad times forced many
unskilled laborers and their families into dire
poverty. Tocqueville took little notice of such
inequalities, in part because he was so captivated by
the theme of American equality. He also had little
interest in how industrialization and urbanization
were affecting society. When he did take notice of
working conditions, he remarked that wages were
higher in America than in Europe and the cost of
living was lower, facts obvious to the most obtuse
European visitor. Furthermore, as with most for-
eign visitors, nearly all his contacts were with mem-
bers of the upper crust. “We hardly see anyone,” he
acknowledged, “except people of distinction.”
Despite his blind spots, Tocqueville realized
that America was undergoing some fundamental
social changes. These changes, he wrote, were being
made by “an innumerable crowd who are...not
exactly rich nor yet quite poor [and who] have
enough property to want order and not enough to
excite envy.” In his notes he put it even more suc-
cinctly: “The whole society seems to have turned
into one middle class.”
The Family Recast
Tocqueville was particularly struck by the character
of the family. Americans, he wrote, showed an
“equal regard” for husbands and wives, but defined
their roles differently. This was made possible by the
growth of the market economy, which undermined
the importance of home and family as the unit of
economic production. More and more people did
their work in shops, in offices, or on factory floors.
Whether a job was skilled or unskilled, white-collar
or blue-collar, or strictly professional, it took the
family breadwinner out of the house during working
100%
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1820 1830 1840 1850 1860
Rural
population
Urban
population
Rural versus Urban Population, 1820–1860As the balance of rural
and urban population began to shift during the years from 1820 to
1860, the number of cities with populations over 100,000 grew from
one in 1820—New York—to nine in 1870, including southern and
western cities like New Orleans and San Francisco.