A Short History of the Middle Ages Fourth Edition

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1

force. In the mid-eighth century, Emperor Constantine V (r.741–775) had created


new crack regiments, the tagmata (sing. tagma). These were mobile troops, not tied


to any theme. Many were composed of cavalry, the elite of fighting men; others—


infantry, muleteers—provided necessary backup. At first deployed largely around


Constantinople itself to shore up the emperors, the tagmata were eventually used in


cautious frontier battles. Under the ninth- and tenth-century emperors, they helped


Byzantium to expand.


To the west, in the Balkans, Emperor Nicephorus I (r.802–811) remodeled the


old thematic territories and added new ones. Settled by immigrant Slavs as well as


native Greeks, the Balkans presented an alluring prize for both the Byzantines and


the Bulgars. Moving into Slavic territory, Nicephorus tried to take Sardica (today


Sofia, Bulgaria), which had long been outside Byzantine control, but his soldiers


mutinied when the emperor asked them to rebuild the city. To secure at least the


northern border of the area, Nicephorus uprooted thousands of families from


Anatolia and sent them to settle in the Balkans.


Still keen to knock out Bulgarian power in the region, Nicephorus marshaled a


huge army. Escorted by the luminaries of his court, he plundered the Bulgarian


capital, Pliska, and then coolly made his way west. But the Bulgarians blockaded his


army as it passed through a narrow river valley, fell on the imperial party, and killed


the emperor. The toll on the fleeing soldiers and courtiers was immense. Theophanes


the Confessor, who detested both Nicephorus (because of his iconoclastic policies)


and the Bulgars, may well have made up the story that Khan Krum (r.803–814)


covered Nicephorus’s skull with silver and turned it into a ceremonial drinking cup,


for it cast a bad light on both khan and emperor. But it was a good metaphor for


Byzantium’s difficulties. Further Byzantine defeats in the region in the late ninth


century led to yet more shuffling of themes. The end result may be seen in Map 3.1,


to which Map 2.1 on p. 40 (Byzantium at its smallest) should be compared.

Free download pdf