A Short History of the Middle Ages Fourth Edition

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1

Above all, iconoclastic churchmen worried about losing control over the sacred.


Unlike relics, images could be reproduced infinitely and without clerical authorization.


Their cultivation at monasteries threatened to encroach on clerical authority. Banning


icons had multiple purposes.


Ultimately, however, iconoclasm was an utter failure, though the ban on icons


lasted until 787 and was revived, in modified form, between 815 and 843. Not only


did the iconoclastic movement come to an end, but during the eighth century the


position of those who supported icons—represented by men such as John of


Damascus (c.675–749)—elaborated ever more ardent arguments on behalf of holy


images:


Of old [before the coming of Christ], God the incorporeal and


uncircumscribed was never depicted. Now, however, when God is seen


clothed in flesh and conversing with men [in the form of Jesus], I make


an image of the God whom I see. I do not worship matter, I worship the


God of matter, who became matter for my sake, and deigned to inhabit


matter, who worked out my salvation through matter. I will not cease


from honoring that matter which works my salvation.^4


The idea that icons held the “real presence” of the divine—a notion that began


around 680—marked a watershed between the early Christian and the medieval


Byzantine states.


Iconophiles (literally “icon lovers”) not only won the battle but also wrote the


history. They vilified Constantine V and the other iconoclastic emperors, calling them


“impious” and “unholy,” and accusing them and their allies of destroying books and


white-washing or obliterating images.^5 Modern historians can verify only some of


these charges. One example remains from Hagia Sophia. A room used by the


patriarch—located just off the southwest corner of the gallery—was originally


covered with mosaics, including medallions with images of saints. During the


iconoclastic period, the images were cut out and replaced by crosses. (See Plate 2.2.)


Elsewhere, new churches were decorated with crosses from the start, while artists of


the iconoclastic period were commissioned to depict (depending on the use of the


building) ornaments, trees, birds, hunting, horse races, and other non-sacred motifs.


The iconoclasts thought that they thereby ensured God’s favor—that, once again, the


Byzantines were God’s “Chosen People.”

Free download pdf