The Economist - UK (2019-06-01)

(Antfer) #1

16 The EconomistJune 1st 2019


Letters are welcome and should be
addressed to the Editor at
The Economist, The Adelphi Building,
1-11 John Adam Street, London WC 2 N 6 HT
Email: [email protected]
More letters are available at:
Economist.com/letters

Letters


Africa’sjihadistbelt
Yourarticleonthespreading
jihadistmenaceintheSahel,
andthepoorresponsetoit by
somegovernments,should
ringalarmbells(“TheWest’s
forgottenwars”,May4th).I
servedwithAmericanforcesin
Africain2011.Although
unquestionablycompetent,
theywerebadlyoverstretched
and,giventhechallenge,
heavilyfocusedoncontaining
thechaosemanatingfrom
Somalia.
Perhapsnotunreasonably,
theAmericansalsofeltthat
Europeanscoulddomore;after
all,theconsequencesof
collapsingstatesorthe
uncheckedriseofwestAfrican
jihadistmovementswouldbe
feltmostkeenlyinEurope.
Thatgeopoliticalanalysisstill
holdsgood,butitssalienceis
notfeltkeenlyenough.Formu-
latinga robustenoughre-
sponsewouldbea classicrole
foran“euarmy”.Britain,inor
outoftheeu, shouldbesup-
portiveofthatinitiative.
Inadditiontoa military
response,theWestmustsup-
portandhelptransformthe
governmentsoftheregion.In
africomwehadstrongcivil-
affairscomponentsbutthey
weredesignedastactical
enablers,notstrategic
transformersofa country’s
polity.Moreover,weshouldbe
carefulofcriticisinganover-
relianceonsometimes
ill-trainedandill-disciplined
pro-governmentmilitias.
Theirbehaviourneedsto
improve,certainly,butoften
theyaretheonlyreadily
mobilesourceofsecurity.
Theirusereflectsa state’s
limitedcapacityandcapability,
notanyinbuiltmalevolence.
colonel(ret’d)simon
diggins
CombinedJointTaskForce
HornofAfrica,africom, 2011
Rickmansworth,Hertfordshire

Conservative Liberals
Judging from the tone of your
article previewing the
Australian election (“Heated
debate”, May 18th) you are
probably bemused as to how
the Liberal coalition, with its

“reactionary”viewonclimate
change,wonthepoll.Couldit
bethattheAustralian
deplorablesgrewtiredofbeing
haranguedbyclimateideo-
loguesandcomfortablywell-
offinner-citydwellers?
georgeking
Melbourne

Modimustdobetter
I takeissuewiththesupport
forNarendraModiexpressed
inyourletterspage(May18th).
UnemploymentinIndiaisata
multi-decadehigh,investment
hasfallen,andtheincreased
importoflentils,despite
bumperdomesticcrops,has
resultedina highersuicide
rateamongfarmers.These
factswereoverlookedbyJag-
dishBhagwatiandhis
colleagues.NitinMehta
paperedoverthefailuresofthe
Modiregime;infact,only10%
ofruralelectrificationhasbeen
achievedinrealterms.
Airingdeepdelusional
concernsoftheplightofthe
majorityHindusisa familiar
canard.Asa memberofa
minoritycommunity(I ama
Sikhmarriedtoa Parsi),I have
heardthisallmylife.Blaming
thetroublesofHindus,who
constitute80%ofthepop-
ulation,onhalfa dozenminor-
itiesispathetic.Thiskindof
thinkingisirrational,petty,
irresponsibleandharmfulto
thesanctityofthecountry.
rajindarsingh
ColoradoSprings

Voicing concerns on privacy
I enjoyed your myth-busting
leader on the growth of voice-
assistants on the internet
(“How creepy is your smart
speaker?” May 11th). But the
dichotomy you posited
between convenience and
privacy is a false one and risks
misleading businesses. Allow-
ing Alexa, or any similar smart
device, into our homes does
not entail a tacit forfeiture of
privacy. This is certainly the
regulators’ view. The sweeping
online-privacy rules outlined
in Europe’s gdpr, and Califor-
nia’s ccpa, are intended to
empower consumers against
Big Tech. I predict there will be

both higher fines under the
new laws and even further
regulations as our devices
continue to get smarter. Busi-
nesses must take note: regu-
lators have new powers and
they will flex their muscles to
avoid any sleepwalking into a
surveillance society.
Irrespective of whether
fears are overblown, what
matters is that there has been a
sea change in the laws and
those looking to monetise big
data now have a much heavier
legal burden on their shoul-
ders. Offering convenience will
be no defence of overreach in
the use of personal data.
rafi azim-khan
Head of data privacy, Europe
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman
London

Intervening in Venezuela
There seems to be amnesia
about the recent history of
interventions by Western
powers (“How to get rid of
Maduro”, May 4th). Whatever
the faults of Nicolás Maduro
(which are many), whatever
the shortcomings of Venezue-
la’s elections (which are almost
as many), and whatever the
state of Venezuela itself (par-
lous), military coups sup-
ported by hostile foreign pow-
ers are not instruments of
democracy. And they usually
make bad situations worse.
Your newspaper cannot
have forgotten that military
intervention in Afghanistan,
Iraq, Libya and Syria turned
those countries into bloody
quagmires. Nor that Western
support for Abdel-Fattah al-
Sisi’s coup in Egypt has result-
ed in stagnation and repres-
sion. The Economistmust also
be perfectly aware of the low-
lights of American policy in
Latin America: Chile,
Nicaragua, El Salvador,
Guatemala, Panama and, under
the guise of the war on drugs,
Colombia and Mexico.
It is unlikely this time will
be different. Perhaps the fail-
ure of the coup in Caracas has
something to do with Venezue-
lans’ view of that history.
george venning
London

The move from the suburbs
Charlemagne exhorted Euro-
pean politicians to go to the
suburbs, “where the ikeas are”,
to get a real understanding of
where Europe’s political fault-
lines lie (May 11th). But al-
though he, and Renzo Piano,
may be right in thinking there
is more energy in the peripher-
ies than the centres of large
cities, ikeano longer agrees.
With the opening of its
store in central Paris and plans
for many more to come in city
centres, ikeais throwing its lot
in with bearded cyclists and
flat-white drinkers.
andrew gaines
Brussels

Politics is a joke
I laughed at your take on the
comedic aspects of today’s
politicians (“You couldn’t
make it up”, May 18th). Another
politician who should have
made your list is Dilma
Rousseff, a former president of
Brazil. She once stated that “We
are not going to set a goal. We
are going to leave the goal
open, but, when we reach our
goal, we are going to double it.”
But Ms Rousseff’s best one-
liner came during her cam-
paign in 2014: “I don’t think
that whoever might win or
lose, will either win or lose.
Everybody will lose.”
gustavo brugnoli
Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Raul Labrador, a Republican
congressman, told a town-hall
meeting in 2017 that “Nobody
dies because they don’t have
access to health care.”
frank robinson
Albany, New York

Allan Lamport, a mayor of
Toronto in the 1950s, said, “If
I’m going to be pushed off a
cliff, I want to be there.”
cec jennings
Toronto
Free download pdf