The Wall Street Journal - USA (2020-12-07)

(Antfer) #1

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. Monday, December 7, 2020 |R5


T


he ideathat com-
panies need to
pursue a purpose
beyond profit has
gained traction in
recent years,
growing stronger
in 2020 with the
pandemic and so-
cial-justice protests.
But 50 years after University of
Chicago economist Milton Friedman
argued in a seminal essay that the
only responsibility of business is to
make money for shareholders, cor-
porate purpose remains a contro-
versial topic. Indeed, many inves-
tors, academics and even executives
say that trying to overhaul capital-
ism by requiring firms to be pur-
pose-led could make things worse,
not better, for those such efforts
are intended to help.
One concern is that corporate
purpose reduces accountability.
Shareholder value can be clearly
measured, so it’s easy to assess
whether a company is delivering it.
But “purpose” is nebulous and
means different things to different
people. An energy firm that closes
coal-fired plants, causing mass lay-
offs, could be deemed purposeful as
it’s serving the environment. But
one that keeps such plants open to
preserve employment might be
viewed as purposeful through an-
other lens. If all sorts of actions can
be consistent with purpose, there’s
no way to hold an executive to ac-
count—anything goes. Evidence sug-
gests that reducing accountability
to investors reduces long-term
value, with no corresponding benefit
to other stakeholders.
A second concern is that often a
stated purpose is generic and
doesn’t tell you what the enterprise
stands for. A purpose to “build a
sustainable company that creates
value for our investors and stake-
holders” is meaningless, as any
company could have this purpose.
Or a company issues an inspiring
purpose statement, but never puts
it into practice. Under cover of an
ill-defined purpose, a CEO might
pursue his or her pet social causes,

rather than the ones most mate-
rial to the company’s business.
This matters: Research shows
that only performance on mate-
rial social issues ultimately bene-
fits investors.
So should we abandon the
whole idea of purpose? Not nec-
essarily. The trick is to find a way
for firms to pursue purpose while
remaining accountable to inves-
tors and ensuring that state-
ments translate into action. Our
proposal is to give investors a
“say on purpose” vote, similar to
thetwo-part“sayonpay”votes
that investors have in Europe.
Hereishowitwouldwork.A
company issues a statement
stating its purpose beyond prof-
its. Importantly, it would clarify
the principles that would apply to

implies. The statement is impor-
tant, but what matters most is
whether it is put into practice.
Therefore, every year investors
also would have an “implementa-
tion vote” on whether they are
satisfied with how the company is
delivering on the statement.
The power of the say-on-pur-
pose approach is immense. First,
the policy vote would give clear
guidance to companies on how to
make decisions that involve trade-
offs, but with the legitimacy pro-
vided by investor support. In a re-
cent paper, Oliver Hart of Harvard
University and Luigi Zingales of
the University of Chicago noted
that investors might be willing to
sacrifice some value for social ob-
jectives, and suggested that com-
panies hold a shareholder vote on

BYALEXEDMANS ANDTOMGOSLING


each major decision. The problem
is, companies often need to make
decisions on a timely basis, such
as whether to continue paying fur-
loughed staff in a pandemic. Inves-
tors also might not have capacity
to vote meaningfully on multiple
decisions a year. Say-on-purpose
achieves the same objective but in
a more practical way that retains
decision rights within the board.
Second, the implementation
vote will enrich the dialogue be-
tween investors and management.
The power isn’t just the vote itself,
but the process that investors
must undergo to cast it. A com-
mon complaint is that investors
focus excessively on short-term
profit, but they will need to deeply
scrutinize a company’s long-term
value and stakeholder relation-
ships to vote meaningfully. This
feeds back into the first advan-
tage: Knowing that investors will
evaluate the company based on
long-term performance, executives
will have the confidence to make
long-term decisions.
Many proposals to reform capi-
talism seek to weaken investor
rights, reducing accountability.
Rather than moving from share-
holder capitalism to stakeholder
capitalism, those proposals would
lead to “managerial capitalism”
where CEOs pursue their own in-
terests, shrinking the pie for both
shareholders and stakeholders.
Say-on-purpose goes with the
grain of investor oversight, but
provides a way for factors beyond
shareholder value to be taken into
account with legitimacy. Impor-
tantly, say-on-purpose can be initi-
ated by companies themselves,
without the need for regulation.
By proactively elevating the dia-
logue beyond short-term profit,
firms will have the freedom to fo-
cus on long-term value—benefiting
both shareholders and society.

Dr. Edmansisaprofessorof
finance andDr. Goslingis an
executive fellow at London
Business School. They can be
reached [email protected]. MIKEL JASO

JOURNAL REPORT|INVESTING IN FUNDS & ETFS


Sustainable Investing


Who Sets the ‘Purpose’?


Investors should have a say in a company’s goals beyond profits


trade-offs the company might
make between investors and
stakeholders (say, it will sacrifice
profits to reduce carbon emis-
sions) or between different stake-
holders (it will decarbonize even
though doing so will lead to lay-
offs). Every three years, investors
would have a “policy vote” on this
statement, to convey whether they
buy into it and the trade-offs it

Corporate purpose
is a controversial
topic. One concern
is that it reduces
a company’s
accountability, write
these academics.

Company Name Symbol Weight

Chevron CVX 23.08%

Exxon Mobil XOM 20.73%

ConocoPhillips COP 4.81%

Schlumberger SLB 4.49%

EOG Resources EOG 4.43%

Kinder Morgan KMI 4.24%

Phillips 66 PSX 4.21%

Marathon Petroleum MPC 3.98%

Williams WMB 3.85%

Valero Energy VLO 3.41%

XLE


Sector SPDRs allow you to invest in pieces of the S&P 500. Like Energy. While adding diversificationand reducing single stock risk. These

ETFs combine the diversification of a mutual fund and the tracking of an index with transparency and liquidity.

THEENERGYSECTOROFTHES&P500INONEETF


ENERGYSECTORSPDRETFTOP 10 HOLDINGS






*Components and weightings as
of 11/30/20. Please see website for
daily updates. Holdings subject
to change.

An investor should consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expensescarefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus, which containsthis and other information, call 1-866-SECTOR-ETF or visit http://www.sectorspdrs.com. Read the
prospectus carefully before investing.
TheS&P500,SPDRs®,andSelectSectorSPDRs®areregisteredtrademarksofStandard&Poor’sFinancialServicesLLC.andhavebeenlicensedforuse.ThestocksincludedineachSelectSectorIndexwereselectedbythecompilationagent.Theircompositionandweightingcanbeexpectedto
differtothatinanysimilarindexesthatarepublishedbyS&P.TheS&P500Indexisanunmanagedindexof500commonstocksthatisgenerallyconsideredrepresentativeoftheU.S.stockmarket.Theindexisheavilyweightedtowardstockswithlargemarketcapitalizationsandrepresents
approximatelytwo-thirdsofthetotalmarketvalueofalldomesticcommonstocks.Investorscannotinvestdirectlyinanindex.TheS&P500Indexfiguresdonotreflectanyfees,expensesortaxes.Ordinarybrokeragecommissionsapply.ETFsareconsideredtransparentbecausetheirportfolio
holdingsarediscloseddaily.Liquidityischaracterizedbyahighleveloftradingactivity.
SelectSectorSPDRsaresubjecttoriskssimilartothoseofstocks,includingthoseregardingshort-sellingandmarginaccountmaintenance.AllETFsaresubjecttorisk,includingpossiblelossofprincipal.Fundsfocusingonasinglesectorgenerallyexperiencegreatervolatility.Diversification
doesnoteliminatetheriskofexperiencinginvestmentlosses.
ALPSPortfolioSolutionsDistributor,Inc.,aregisteredbroker-dealer,isdistributorfortheSelectSectorSPDRTrust.

Visit http://www.sectorspdrs.com or call 1-866-SECTOR-ETF
Free download pdf