Persuasive Communication - How Audiences Decide. 2nd Edition

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1

118 Understanding Rational Decision Making


Similar to reading audiences, listening audiences usually forget the specifi c words uttered in a spoken

sentence almost immediately after they have heard it. In one study of listeners’ sentence comprehen-


sion, people listened to sentences and then had to distinguish between the original sentence and a close


paraphrase of it. Listeners’ memory for the exact wording of the sentence decayed rapidly, but their


memory for the sentence’s meaning persisted much longer.^129 In a subsequent study, although the


listeners remembered verbatim the words in the clause they were currently processing, they forgot the


exact words and word order of prior clauses as soon as each sentence was spoken.^130


Interestingly, listeners do tend to remember the exact wording of any message that has an emo-

tional impact on them, as challenges or insults often do.^131 The exact wording of poems, song lyrics,


and important phrases are also more likely to be remembered. In addition, listeners are often able


to remember the exact wording of a sentence if they are requested to do so. In a study of audi-


tory recall, two groups of listeners listened to recorded instructions. The fi rst group was told to


remember the sentences in the instructions verbatim; the second group was not. Then both groups’


memory of the style and content of the sentences was tested. The fi rst group remembered the sen-


tences in the instructions verbatim—both style and content. The second group remembered each


sentence’s meaning but little of its exact wording.^132


Viewers’ Comprehension


When audiences comprehend images they spontaneously assign verbal labels to them (e.g., “That


is a picture of a young mother holding her baby”).^133 Older children and adults automatically


assign a verbal label to all except the most complex and novel images.^134 Although audiences


normally extract meaning from a verbal message and forget the style in which it was presented,


they typically remember the exact picture they saw as well as its meaning. Asked to look at a set


of 10,000 pictures, viewers were later able to identify 83% of the pictures they had seen.^135 In a


study of advertisement recall, consumers were presented 600 magazine ads all containing text and


pictures. Consumers recognized 96.7% of the pictures immediately after viewing them, 99.7% after


a two-hour delay, 92% after three days, 87% after seven days, and 57.7% after 120 days. Consumers


had an 11.8% error rate in distinguishing read versus unread sentences in the ads, but only a 1.5%


error rate in distinguishing viewed versus not-viewed pictures.^136


Graph comprehension is a combination of text and image comprehension. The time needed

for graph comprehension is similar to that needed to read and understand a paragraph of mod-


erate length.^137 But before an audience can comprehend a graph, they must fi rst translate its


visual features into the concepts those features represent.^138 One theory of graph comprehension


proposes that after viewers encode the visual features in a graph, they then interpret the mean-


ings of those features as quantitative concepts. For example, viewers may recognize that a straight


line in a graph represents a linear relationship. Only then do they identify what each feature of


the graph refers to. Additional graph comprehension processes include keeping track of multiple


comparisons, performing calculations, and mentally translating from one scale to another.^139


More recent experimental studies of graph comprehension indicate that viewers first acti-

vate a mental model or schema of a graph when trying to interpret its meaning. Then they


map its graphic elements onto the schema’s conceptual entities and its spatial relations onto


the schema’s semantic relations.^140 Errors that viewers make when interpreting graphs pri-


marily result from inadequate schemata rather than inaccurate perceptual processes. In one


study of graph comprehension, all of the viewers accurately reproduced from memory the


graphs they had seen, but because many of them lacked the knowledge or schemata needed


to interpret the quantitative information depicted by the graphs, they were unable to grasp


their meaning.^141

Free download pdf