Aids to Audience Decision Making 203388 Wright, P. (1974). The use of phased, noncompensatory strategies in decisions between multi-attribute products.
Research Paper 223. Stanford, CA: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
389 Simkin, D. K., & Hastie, R. (1986). An information processing analysis of graph perception. Journal of the
American Statistical Association , 82 , 454–465.
390 Shah, P., & Hoeffner, J. (2002). Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction.
Educational Psychology Review , 14 (1), 47–69.
391 Hollands, J. G., & Spence, I. (2001). The discrimination of graphical elements. Applied Cognitive Psychol-
ogy , 15 (4), 413–431.
392 Schnotz, W., & Baadte, C. (2015). Surface and deep structures in graphics comprehension. Memory &
Cognition , 43 (4), 605–618.
393 Gattis, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 22 (1), 231–239.
394 Gaeth, G. J., & Shanteau, J. (1984). Reducing the influence of irrelevant information on experienced
decision makers. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance , 33 (2), 263–282.
Labella, C., & Koehler, D. J. (2004). Dilution and confirmation of probability judgments based on non-
diagnostic evidence. Memory & Cognition , 32 (7), 1076–1089.
Waller, W. S., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2003). A cognitive footprint in archival data: Generalizing the dilu-
tion effect from laboratory to field settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 91 (2),
254–268.
395 See n217, Canham & Hagarty (2010).
396 Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest
in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology , 90 (3), 414–434.
397 Ibid.
398 Nisbett, R. E., Zukier, H., & Lemley, R. E. (1981). The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weak-
ens the implications of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology , 13 (2), 248–277.
399 Tetlock, P. E., Lerner, J. S., & Boettger, R. (1996). The dilution effect: Judgmental bias, conversational
convention. or a bit of both? European Journal of Social Psychology , 26 , 915–934.
400 Bamber, E. M., Tubbs, R. M., Gaeth, G., & Ramsey, R. J. (1991). Characteristics of audit experience in belief
revision. Presented at USC Audit Judgment Symposium. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern Cali-
fornia.
Baranski, J. V., & Petrusic, W. M. (2010). Aggregating conclusive and inconclusive information: Data and
a model based on the assessment of threat. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 23 (4), 383–403.
401 Chinander, K. R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2003). The input bias: The misuse of input information in judg-
ments of outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 91 (2), 243–253.
402 Friedrich, J., Fetherstonhaugh, D., Casey, S., & Gallagher, D. (1996). Argument integration and attitude
change: Suppression effects in the integration of one-sided arguments that vary in persuasiveness. Personal-
ity and Social Psychology Bulletin , 22 (2), 179–191.
Martire, K. A., Kemp, R. I., Watkins, I., Sayle, M. A., & Newell, B. R. (2013). The expression and inter-
pretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: Verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak
evidence effect. Law and Human Behavior , 37 (3), 197–207.
403 Weaver, K., Garcia, S. M., & Schwarz, N. (2012). The presenter’s paradox. Journal of Consumer Research ,
39 (3), 445–460.
404 de Vries, G., Terwel, B. W., & Ellemers, N. (2014). Spare the details, share the relevance: The dilution
effect in communications about carbon dioxide capture and storage. Journal of Environmental Psychology ,
38 , 116–123.
405 Meyvis, T., & Janiszewski, C. (2002). Consumers’ beliefs about product benefits: The effect of obviously
irrelevant product information. Journal of Consumer Research , 28 (4), 618–635.
406 Young II, G. R., Price, K. H., & Claybrook, C. (2001). Small group predictions on an uncertain outcome:
The effect of nondiagnostic information. Theory and Decision , 50 (2), 149–167.
407 Kemmelmeier, M. (2004). Separating the wheat from the chaff: Does discriminating between diagnostic
and nondiagnostic information eliminate the dilution effect? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 17 (3),
231–243.
408 Greeno, J. G., & Noreen, D. L. (1974). Time to read semantically related sentences. Memory & Cognition ,
2 (1-A), 117–120.