Emotions in Audience Decision Making 317
deceased. Thus each person had a different emotional reaction to the same event because each
valued the deceased differently.
The fact that different audience members have different goals and values appears to explain many
individual differences in consumer behavior and media exposure.^76 For example, a cross-cultural
study fi nds that consumers in France purchase expensive bottles of wine because of their desire
for social interaction, whereas consumers in the United States purchase the same wines in order
to prove themselves to others.^77 Thus, an ad that motivates consumers in Boston is unlikely to be
effective with consumers in Paris. Likewise, because different citizens have different values that
come into play when they decide whether to recycle, recycling campaigns focused on a single value
tend to have only limited success.^78
The Link Between Decision Criteria and Goals and Values
The audience’s decision criteria determine which of their goals and values are implicated when
they make a decision.^79 For instance, when deciding between two cars, the criterion or attribute of
safety may implicate the value of personal survival, whereas the criterion of styling may implicate
the value of personal expression. In addition, there is a direct connection between the goals and
values that product attributes implicate and consumer purchases and preferences.^80 Consumers are
motivated to buy a product to the extent they are able to link the product’s attributes to their own
goals and values.^81
The values consumers link to products are often better predictors of their product preferences
than the products’ attributes.^82 The values consumers link to products correlate not only with their
initial purchase intentions, but also with their product and/or service evaluations and with their
repeat purchases as well.^83
Much like consumers responding to products that implicate their goals and values, subordinates
respond more positively to leaders who endorse their goals and values.^84 Business leaders who
frame messages in terms of their subordinates’ goals and values, as opposed to their own, increase
their employees’ motivation, commitment, and satisfaction.^85
Decision criteria or attributes with implications for the audience’s more highly valued goals trigger
more emotion.^86 Although economic attributes such as price may be highly important to consumers,
economic attributes do not have as much potential to elicit emotion as other attributes such as safety
features.^87 Decision criteria or attributes with implications for the audience’s more highly valued goals
are also higher in “trade-off diffi culty.”^88 For instance, new parents who purchase an automobile may
be very reluctant to accept losses on the attribute of safety for gains on the attribute of fuel effi ciency.
Similarly, voters are rarely willing to trade off a positive evaluation of a candidate on an economic issue
for a negative evaluation of the same candidate on a highly valued ethical issue.^89
Cognitive and Physiological Processes in Emotional Decision Making
Unlike rational decision making, emotional decision making includes physiological as well as cog-
nitive processes. Emotional decision making starts as soon as the audience perceives an emotionally
signifi cant stimulus or recognizes an emotionally signifi cant attribute of a stimulus. Only those
stimuli or attributes of a stimulus that are relevant to the audience’s goals and values can be said
to be emotionally signifi cant. As we have seen, the stimulus itself does not trigger an emotion or
the decisions based on it, instead an emotion is triggered when the stimulus implicates one of the
audience’s goals or values.^90
The model of emotional decision making proposed here and shown in Figure 7.1 builds on this
understanding of emotionally signifi cant stimuli. The model also presents an account of emotions