324 Understanding Emotional Decision Making
FIGURE 7.4 Emotional Appraisals Trigger Action Tendencies
Different emotional appraisals lead to different physiological changes. For example, the appraisal
of negatively valenced pictures decelerates viewers’ heart rates, whereas the appraisal of positively
valenced pictures produces a large peak in heart rate acceleration.^160
The audience’s physiological responses to emotional appraisals also evoke specifi c action
tendencies in them.^161 In an early account of action tendencies, psychologist Robert Plutchik
proposed that anger evokes the action tendency to destroy; fear to protect; sadness to reinte-
grate; joy to reproduce; and disgust to reject.^162 Somewhat later, psychologist Richard Lazarus
proposed a similar set of action tendencies for each emotion.^163 Table 7.3 shows the overall
agreement among fi ve prominent theorists about the action tendencies associated with eight
different emotions.
Action tendencies, such as those illustrated in Figure 7.4, play an infl uential role in audience
decision making. For example, sadness amplifi es the audience’s commitment to hold on to their
possessions, whereas disgust triggers an impulse to get rid of them.^164 Consumers who experience
regret after failing to receive good service have a different action tendency than consumers who are
angry about poor service. Consumers who experience regret switch to another service provider,
whereas consumers who are angry actively engage in negative word-of-mouth.^165
TABLE 7.3 Researchers Are in Basic Agreement About Action Tendencies
Plutchik
(1980)
Frijda
(1986)
Lazarus
(1991)
Roseman
(2001)
Surprise Stop Interrupt Interrupt
Joy Reproduce Activate Expand Act
Fear Protect Avoid Escape Prevent
Anger Destroy Attack Attack Attack
Sadness Reintegrate Deactivate Withdraw Inaction
Disgust Reject Reject Eject Expel
Shame Submit Hide Withdraw
Pride Dominate Expand Dominate