372 References
Carsten, M. K., Uhl-Bien, M., West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & McGregor, R. (2010). Exploring social constructions
of followership: A qualitative study. The Leadership Quarterly, 21 (3), 543–562.
Carswell, C. M., & Wickens, C. D. (1987). Information integration and the object display: An interaction of
task demands and display superiority. Ergonomics, 30 (3), 511–527.
Carter, W. B., Beach, L. R., & Inui, T. S. (1986). The fl u shot study: Using multiattribute utility theory to
design a vaccination intervention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38 (3), 378–391.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process
view. Psychological Review, 97 (1), 19–35.
Cassie, J. R. B., & Robinson, F. G. (1982). A decision schema approach to career decision making. International
Journal of Advances in Counseling, 5 , 165–182.
Castellan, N. J. (Ed.). (1993). Individual and group decision making: Current issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Cauchard, F., Eyrolle, H., Cellier, J. M., & Hyönä, J. (2010). Vertical perceptual span and the processing of
visual signals in reading. International Journal of Psychology, 45 (1), 40–47.
Cauchard, F., Eyrolle, H., Cellier, J. M., & Hyönä, J. (2010). Visual signals vertically extend the perceptual span
in searching a text: A gaze-contingent window study. Discourse Processes, 47 (8), 617–640.
Cavina-Pratesi, C., Large, M. E., & Milner, A. D. (2015). Visual processing of words in a patient with visual
form agnosia: A behavioural and fMRI study. Cortex, 64 , 29–46.
Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 37 (8), 1387.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message
cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (5), 752–766.
Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1976). Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and
message comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 (4), 605–614.
Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of
communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (2), 241–256.
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and
beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252).
New York: Guilford Press.
Chall, J. S. (1958). Readability: An appraisal of research and application. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Reprinted 1974. Epping, UK: Bowker Publishing Company.
Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Northampton, MA:
Brookline Books.
Chan, S. (1982). Expert judgments under uncertainty: Some evidence and suggestions. Social Science Quarterly,
63 , 428–444.
Chance, M. R. A. (1976). The organization of attention in groups. In M. von Cranach (Ed.), Methods of infer-
ence from animal to human behavior (pp. 213–235). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
Chandler, R. C. (1988). Organizational communication to corporate constituents: The role of the com-
pany annual report (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International,
49 (11A), 3200.
Chang, M. J., & Gruner, C. R. (1981). Audience reaction to self-disparaging humor. Southern Speech Com-
munication Journal, 46 , 419–426.
Chang, S. C., Chen, S. S., Chou, R. K., & Lin, Y. H. (2008). Weather and intraday patterns in stock returns and
trading activity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32 (9), 1754–1766.
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79 (2), 115–153.
Charrow, R., & Charrow, V. R. (1979). Making legal language understandable: Psycholinguistic study of jury
instructions. Columbia Law Review, 79 , 1306–1374.
Charrow, V. R. (1988). Readability vs. comprehensibility: A case study in improving a real document. In A.
Davison & G. M. Green (Eds.), Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered (pp.
85–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Charrow, V. R., & Redish, J. (1980). A study of standardized headings for warranties (Document Design Project
Technical Report No. 6). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social inter-
action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (6), 893.
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4 (1), 55–81.
Chattopadhyay, A., Dahl, D. W., Ritchie, R. J. B., & Shahin, K. N. (2003). Hearing voices: The impact of
announcer speech characteristics on consumer response to broadcast advertising. Journal of Consumer Psy-
chology, 13 (3), 198–204.
Chen, L. (1982). Topological structure in visual perception. Science, 218 (4573), 699–700.