Barron's - USA (2020-12-07)

(Antfer) #1

10 BARRON’S December 7, 2020


in yields, given that the two quantities


move inversely.


On the latter score, corporate bond


yields are hovering near or at historic


lows, which is arguably more important


to fixed-income investors than an uptick


in the benchmark 10-year Treasury note


yield back to the recent high of all of


0.95%.


The yield on the Bloomberg Barclays


U.S. Corporate Bond Index this past week


stood at 1.84%, just above the 52-week


(and all-time) low of 1.8%. For BBB-rated


corporate bonds at the low end of the


investment-grade scale, the yield was just


2.12%, a bit over the low of 2.09%. And in


what ought to be a violation of the truth


in labeling laws, the ICE BofA High Yield


Constrained Index stood at a record low


of 4.616%.


Those numbers prompted a call to Dan


Fuss, the ageless manager of theLoomis


Sayles Bondfund (ticker: LSBRX), to see


how he’s coping. “Not well,” he replied,


only a bit facetiously. In the old days, he


recalled, he could tell clients how good


things were after a rally, which he


quipped, basically amounted to “same


bonds, new prices.”


By contrast, Fuss and every other bond


manager has to confront the problem that


reinvestment returns have plummeted.


As a result, compounding of interest can’t


work its magic to grow assets to meet the


future needs of institutions such as pen-


sion funds and endowments. “Toss in an


extra prayer for life-insurance companies,


which have long-term obligations” to


policyholders, he says. It isn’t a unique


observation, but one that people have


been wrestling with even before this


year’s events.


Investors aren’t compensated for the risk


they assume, Fuss continues. Spreads—the


extra yield for riskier securities—are slim


in the corporate market. That’s true in


spreads between BB- and B-rated bonds


(the upper- and mid-tiers of the high-yield


market) or between BB+ and BBB- (the


dividing line between high-yield and


investment-grade bonds).


“I assert, currently, that you are not


getting paid for credit risk, and this is cer-


tainly a major consideration when you


look at your portfolios,” Mark Grant, chief


global strategist, fixed income, at B. Riley


Financial, similarly writes in his Out of


the Box note to clients. This bond-market


veteran puts the blame on the Fed


and other central banks for creating a


“borrower’s paradise” and a “fixed-income


investor’s hell,” by holding interest rates


down, in part to help finance the massive


fiscal deficits.


Part of the explanation for the lack of


compensation for credit risk is also the


proliferation of passive funds, notably


exchange-traded funds, Fuss continues.


As an active manager, he admits this is a


bit self-serving, but it results in the specific


risk of bonds being “underevaluated.”


There also is the pressure to put money to


work in the market, with over $335 billion


flooding into bond funds this year through


Nov. 24.


With yields so low, the risk is that


they’ll rise, which means that bond prices


risk falling. Based on a five-year forecast,


Fuss thinks it reasonable that interest


rates will be higher than currently. Corpo-


rations are acting on that expectation,


issuing bonds now in anticipation of pay-


ing off current issues as soon as they can


be called, he notes.


For investors, however, he doesn’t see


the payoff for taking those risks. “The


counterargument is, you’ll be good for


about two years, going out on the [yield]


curve and taking credit risk. Would you


get on a plane with those odds?” he asks


rhetorically.


Fuss admits that he gets unsolicited


input from shareholders in the $9.1 billion


Loomis Sayles Bond fund, notably about


maintaining the dividend, which yielded


2.68% as of Nov. 30. To that end, the fund


has a relatively expansive field of invest-


ments it can play in. The equity securities


limit is up to 20% from 10% previously,


while 35% can go to below-investment-


grade debt.


As noted here, the search for income


has led Fuss to stocks with dividends that


pay higher yields than the company’s


bonds. As an example, he notes that earlier


this yearPfizershares (PFE) yielded 4.2%


(compared with 3.79% currently), while he


recalls the pharma company’s debt yielded


“three and a fraction.”


Asked about another recently bumped


Dow Jones industrials member with an


outsize yield,Exxon Mobil(XOM), Fuss


wasn’t enticed. He noted the oil giant’s


latest asset write-down. “I won’t take you


through my climate-change speech,” he


added.


Nevertheless, Exxon topped a recent


screen of high-yielding stocks, even


though it was noted that a dividend cut


probably is priced into the stock.


That’s the problem with new highs. The


way forward often is lower.B


email: [email protected]


Up & Down Wall Street Continued


Align Your


Portfolio


With How


You Shop


Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. The investable


universe of companies in which EBIZ may invest may be limited. The companies


in which the Fund invests may be subject to rapid changes in technology, intense


competition, rapid obsolescence of products and services, loss of intellectual


property protections, evolving industry standards and frequent new product


productions, and changes in business cycles and government regulation.


Carefully consider the Fund’s investment objectives, risk factors, charges


and expenses before investing. This and additional information can be


found in the Fund’s full or summary prospectus, which are available at


globalxetfs.com. Read the prospectus carefully before investing.


Shares of ETFs are bought and sold at market price (not NAV) and are not


individually redeemed from the Fund. Brokerage commissions will reduce


returns. Distributed by SEI Investments Distribution Co.


1 (888) 493-


GLOBALXETFS.COM


Beyond Ordinary ETFs


TM

EBIZ


E-commerce ETF

Free download pdf