Declining Power, Disappearing State: The Ottoman Empire and Poland 427
est tax farmers, engendered peasant resistance. As in the cases of China
and Japan, Ottomans and the scholar class (tilama) showed little interest
in Western ideas or technology. The single printing press in the empire,
which dated only from the 1720s, was shut down sixty years later; no
newspaper was published until 1828, and that in Cairo, not Istanbul. The
classical literary tradition, as in China and Japan, continued to hold sway.
The long decline of Ottoman power in Europe began when the Turks were
turned back at the gates of Vienna in 1683. Austria’s subsequent conquest
of Hungary and Transylvania was confirmed by the Treaty of Carlowitz in
- However, the Turks continued to control the Black Sea by virtue of
holding Constantinople and the straits. Major Ottoman defeats left the
way open for continued Russian expansion. Although the Ottomans took
advantage of inter-European wars to maintain their peripheral territories,
in the 1760s this began to change. In 1774, following the destruction of
the Turkish fleet in the Black Sea, the Ottoman Turks granted Russia the
right to oversee Turkish authority in the Danubian principalities and to
serve as the official protector of Christians living within its empire. In the
meantime, in Morocco, Algiers, Tripoli, and Tunis, which remained nom
inally part of the Ottoman Empire, local dynasties set up shop. Yet we
should not exaggerate the decline of the Ottoman Empire, which remained
a power capable of effectively defending its interests well into the nine
teenth century.
The Partitions of Poland
While the Ottoman Empire survived, Poland did not endure as an inde
pendent state (at least until the end of World War I). Poland was, for all
intents and purposes, a republic. It had a king who was elected by citizens,
a Senate (which included bishops and other important personages), and
an elected Chamber of Deputies (the Sejm). The Sejm, which met every two
years but which the king could convene in an emergency, elected the king for
life and retained the right to pass laws, approve taxes, and ratify treaties.
The king could not travel out of the country without the approval of the
Sejm. Moreover, the “liberum veto” (“I freely forbid”) accentuated the influ
ence of the wealthiest nobles, who sometimes combined forces to block
legislation. The rise of even more powerful aristocrats who owned vast
estates exacerbated the impact of the “liberum veto” within the Sejm, pre
venting reforms that might have strengthened Poland.
During the first decades of the eighteenth century, the kingdom, its pop
ulation reduced by wars and bubonic plague to only 6 million people,
became increasingly dependent on Russia. Indeed, Poland’s eclipse made
possible Russia’s gains in Ukraine. The War of Polish Succession (1733
1735) began when Russia attempted to impose its candidate on the Polish
throne over the opposition of the Polish nobles. Because of France’s interest
in maintaining Sweden, the Ottoman Empire, and Poland as checks against