I
n 1967, when the U.S. population hit
a milestone 200 million, the U.S.
population was 84 percent white, 11
percent black, four percent Hispanic and
one percent Asian and Pacific Islander.
In 2006, when the U.S. population
reached 300 million, the population
makeup had changed to 66 percent
white, 12 percent black, four percent
Asian and Pacific Islander and nearly 15
percent Hispanic. Of those 100 million
new Americans, 36 percent were
Hispanic, and the total Hispanic popula-
tion had grown from just 8.5 million in
1967 to 44.7 million in 2006.
Not surprisingly, this enormous pop-
ulation shift has had a profound impact
on American culture, economics, and pol-
itics. While Americans of all ethnic back-
grounds danced to the sounds of Latin
musical artists like Ricky Martin and
Gloria Estefan in the 1990s or Jenifer
Lopez, Shakira and Yankee Daddy in the
2000s, politicians on local, state and fed-
eral levels eagerly courted Hispanic vot-
ers, even though Latinos do not typically
vote as a monolithic bloc. Although
Hispanic Americans are still underrepre-
sented at the highest levels of power and
many Latinos still live in poverty, business
leaders also increasingly understand the
economic clout of the Hispanic-American
community, and Hispanic American-
owned businesses are a rapidly growing
force in the American economy.
THE CONTINUING DEBATE
ON IMMIGRATION
Meanwhile, the tensions over legal and
illegal immigration have grown, becom-
ing an even greater concern in the U.S.
Congress, in the 2008 presidential race,
and in the minds of many American
citizens than ever before. According to
a January 14–16th, 2008 nationwide
poll of 1000 adults conducted by Fortune
Magazine, 60 percent felt that the
immigration issue was either extremely or
very important to them.
This view was especially pronounced
among Republican voters, particularly in
Iowa, which held the nation’s first 2008
presidential caucuses earlier that month.
According to Iowa Republicans, the issue
of illegal immigration was the single most
important issue facing the nation, topping
the state of the economy, the Iraq War or
terrorism. In fact, Republican Senator
John McCain of Arizona, who would go
on to win his party’s nomination, gar-
nered considerable heat from the conser-
vative wing of his party for working with
the liberal Senate icon Edward M.
Kennedy of Massachusetts to craft a com-
promise immigration reform bill that
would have allowed some illegal immi-
grants to remain in the country with a
guest visa as long as they paid a $1,500
fine. Former Massachusetts governor
Mitt Romney, one of McCain’s competi-
tors for the nomination, accused McCain
of offering “amnesty” to illegal immi-
grants, a charge McCain denied. For his
part, Romney argued that any immigra-
tion reform must start with securing the
U.S.-Mexican border and issuing tamper-
proof cards to all non-citizens so that
employers could verify their legal status
before hiring them. Yet the deep reliance
of the American economy on cheap, ille-
gal labor from Latin America was under-
scored when the public learned that the
landscaper hired by Mr. Romney to care
for the front lawn of his mansion used
illegal day laborers from Guatemala.
The Migrant Worker
Debate
Tensions between proponents of stricter
enforcement of immigration laws and ille-
gal migrant farm workers and day laborers
are made infinitely more complicated by
the U.S. labor force’s deep reliance on
migrant farm workers and day laborers.
According to one recent survey, more than
two million year-round and seasonal
migrant farm workers, including 100,000
children, work in the United States. About
two-thirds are immigrants, and more than
Hispanic America Today
9
CHAPTER
“The [African-American]
civil rights slogan was
‘We shall overcome.’
Ours is going to be we
shall overwhelm.”
— Christy Haubegger, Editor,
Latinamagazine