Hellenistic Philosophy Introductory

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1
6 1-2
overview of the universe unless one can have in oneself a comprehensive
grasp by means of brief maxims of all that might also be worked out in
detail with precision.


  1. Since this kind of method is useful to all those who are concerned
    with the study of nature, I recommend constant activity in the study of
    nature; and with this sort of activity more than any other I bring calm
    to my life. That is why I have composed for you this type of summary
    statement of the basic principles of the entire set of doctrines.
    First, Herodotus, we need to have grasped what is denoted by our
    words, [1] so that by referring to what they denote we can make decisions
    about the objects of opinion, investigation, or puzzlement and [2] so that
    all of these things will not remain undecided, [as they would] if we tried
    to give an infinitely long demonstration, and [3] so that our words will
    not be empty. 38. For it is necessary that we look to the primary conception
    corresponding to each word and that it stand in no need of demonstration,
    if, that is, we are going to have something to which we can refer the
    object of search or puzzlement and opinion. Again, it is also necessary
    to observe all things in accordance with one's sense-perceptions, i.e.,
    simply according to the present applications, whether of the intellect or
    of any other of the criteria, and similarly [to observe everything] in
    accordance with our actual feelings, so that we can have some sign by
    which we may make inferences both about what awaits confirmation and
    about the non-evident.
    After distinguishing these points we must next arrive at a general view
    about the things which are non-evident. The first point is that nothing
    comes into being from what is not; for [in that case] everything would
    be coming into being from everything, with no need of seeds. 39. And
    if that which disappears were destroyed into what is not, all things would
    have been destroyed, since that into which they were dissolved does not
    exist. Further, the totality [of things] has always been just like it is now
    and always will be. For there is nothing for it to change into. For there
    exists nothing in addition to the totality, which could enter into it and
    produce the change.
    Moreover/ the totality is [made up of] ; for in all
    cases sense-perception itself testifies that bodies exist, and it is by sense-
    perception that we must infer by reasoning what is non-evident, as I
    already said. 40. And if there did not exist that which we call void and
    space and intangible nature, bodies would not have any place to be in
    or move through, as they obviously do move. Beyond these two things

  2. A scholiast in antiquity added: "He makes this point in the Major Summary at the
    beginning and in book one of the On Nature."

Free download pdf