( 226 ) Notes to pages 68–73
- Mark Cocker, Rivers of Blood, Rivers of Gold: Europe’s Conflict with Tribal Peoples
(London: Jonathan Cape, 1998), p. 317.
- Cited in Leon F. Litwack, Trouble in Mind: Black Southerners in the Age of Jim Crow
(New York: Knopf, 1998), p. 34.
- James S. Hirsch, Riot and Remembrance: The Tulsa Race War and Its Legacy
(New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2002), p. 201.
- See, for example, J. A. Rogers, 100 Amazing Facts about the Negro with Complete Proof:
A Short Cut to the World History of the Negro (St. Petersburg, FL: Helga M. Rogers, 1985;
orig. ed. 1952).
- Stephen Steinberg, Turning Back: The Retreat from Racial Justice in American Thought and
Policy (Boston: Beacon Press, 1995), p. ix.
- W. E. B. Du Bois, Dusk of Dawn: An Essay toward an Autobiography of a Race Concept
(New York: Oxford University Press, 2007; orig. ed. 1940), p. 66.
- Steinberg, Turning Back, p. 51.
- Steinberg, Turning Back, p. 51. See also Francille Rusan Wilson, The Segregated
Scholars: Black Social Scientists and the Creation of Black Labor Studies, 1890– 1950
(Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2006).
- In his recent The Scholar Denied: W. E. B. Du Bois and the Birth of Modern Sociology
(Oakland: University of California Press, 2015), Aldon Morris argues that it is Du Bois
and his “Atlanta school” rather than Robert E. Park and the “Chicago school” who actually
deserve the credit for being the founders of American sociology. But apart from his unac-
ceptable blackness, Du Bois’s sociological indictment of white supremacy as the real cause
of “the Negro problem” made any such acknowledgment impossible in the Jim Crow acad-
emy of the time— or even today, more than a century later.
- See, for example, Brian P. McLaughlin and Amelie Oksenberg Rorty, eds., Perspectives on
Self- Deception (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988) and Alfred R. Mele, Self-
Deception Unmasked (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001).
- See Ruth J. Sample, Exploitation: What It Is and Why It’s Wrong (Lanham, MD: Rowman
& Littlefield, 2003), for a Kantian updating of the concept and an argument for bringing
it back to the center of our concerns.
- Du Bois, Dusk of Dawn, p. 65.
- Linda Faye Williams, The Constraint of Race: Legacies of White Skin Privilege in America
(University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003).
- Donald R. Kinder and Lynn M. Sanders, Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic
Ideals (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), pp. 33, 85.
- Stanley Cohen, States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering (Malden,
MA: Polity, 2001), pp. 10– 11, 45.
CHAPTER 5
- Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development
(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998; orig. ed. 1982); Nel Noddings,
Caring : A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, 2nd ed. (Berkeley: University
of California Press, 2003; orig. ed. 1984).
- Samantha Brennan, “Recent Work in Feminist Ethics,” Ethics 109 ( July 1999), p. 859.
- Marilyn Friedman, “Feminism in Ethics: Conceptions of Autonomy,” in Miranda
Fricker and Jennifer Hornsby, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Ethics
(New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 211.
- Alison Jaggar, “Ethics Naturalized: Feminism’s Contribution to Moral Epistemology,”
Metaphilosophy 31, no. 5 (October 2000), pp. 452–53.
- Brennan, “Recent Work,” p. 860.
- Alison Jaggar, Feminist Politics and Human Nature (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld,
1983); Rosemarie Putnam Tong, Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction,
4th ed. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2013; orig. ed. 1989).
http://www.ebook3000.com
