Chapter 20 Political violence
Introduction
Since 11 September 2001, when the World Trade Center and part of the
Pentagon were demolished through terrorist attacks, the question of political
violence has been widely debated in the media and elsewhere.
Just what is political violence? Can a practitioner of political violence be
coherently distinguished from a guerrilla or freedom fighter? An analysis of
political violence is particularly important, given the fact that authoritarian
regimes may find it convenient to label all manifestations of violent opposition
as ‘terrorist’ in nature. Why does political violence arise and, above all, what
we can do about it? It is important that we try to understand it not as a way
of condoning it but because we will never be able to eradicate this violence
unless we understand it – its sources, its raison d’êtreand its apparent
justifications.
Chapter map
In this chapter we will explore:
- The liberal tradition and political
violence. The traditional view of the
state as an institution that does not
itself use political violence. - Salmi’s distinction between four types
of violence, and a critique of Salmi’s
position. The distinction between
political violence and terrorism proper.- Marx, Lenin and Mao’s view of political
violence. The problem of a general
theory of political violence. - The roots of political violence.
- The link between political violence and
the state. The problem of US policy
towards political violence.
- Marx, Lenin and Mao’s view of political