Fair taxes
S
hould the state tax people? That is, should
it be allowed to appropriate resources
through coercion? If so, what type of
taxation is justified? The case against any form
of taxation is that it is an illegitimate interference
in the decisions of individuals. If you help to
make a singer very rich by buying her albums
then that is your choice and you cannot complain
if the result of your actions – combined with the
actions of her other fans – is that inequality
results. We will explore the counter-arguments
to this position in this chapter, but assuming that
some kind of taxation is justified which is the
fairest? Think about the options below. What are
the arguments for and against each one? Try to
rank them in order of fairness, from the fairest
to the least fair.
- Progressive income taxThe first part of your
earnings are not taxed and then each subse-
quent level of earnings is taxed at a progres-
sively higher marginal rate. For example,
zero tax on earnings below $10,000; 10 per
cent on $10,000–$14,999; 20 per cent on
$15,000–$24,999; 30 per cent on $25,000–
$39,999; 40 per cent on $40,000–$99,999;
50 per cent on earnings above $100,000.
- Flat-rate income taxA single rate of tax on
all earnings. For example, if you earn $10,000
you pay 20 per cent. If you earn $500,000
you pay 20 per cent.
- Sales tax (on all products). For example,
20 per cent on all products.
- Sales tax on luxury items.
- Property purchase tax Taxation on the
purchase value of a property. For example,
2 per cent on properties below $500,000;
4 per cent on properties above $500,000 (and
higher rates for more expensive properties).
- Capital gains taxA tax on non-employment
earnings. For example if you bought a house
for $300,000 and sold it five years later for
$450,000 you would be taxed on the
$150,000 increase.
- Inheritance taxA tax on the estate of a
deceased person.
- Site value taxA tax on the unimproved value
of land (you are not taxed on any improve-
ments you make, such as building a house).
© Rob Chatterson/Corbis