24 PART oNE • THE AmERiCAN sYsTEm
The second Continental Congress
By the time the Second Continental Congress met in May 1775 (all of the colonies were
represented this time), fighting had already broken out between the British and the
colonists. One of the main actions of the Second Continental Congress was to establish
an army. It did this by declaring the militia that had gathered around Boston an army
and naming George Washington as commander in chief. Congressional participants still
at issue
Christianity utterly permeated the world of the first
English settlers in America. The oldest colonial docu-
ments are filled with endorsements of Christianity.
Regular church attendance was often mandatory.
Nine of the colonies had churches that were estab-
lished by law.
The Declaration of Independence, however,
makes no reference to Christ. The word God does not
appear in the Constitution. By 1790, officially estab-
lished churches were found only in Connecticut and
Massachusetts, and the Congregational Church in
Massachusetts had drifted so far from its Puritan ori-
gins that many of its members no longer accepted the
divinity of Jesus. That is, they belonged to Unitarian
congregations. One result of this development was
that in the national elections of 1796 and 1800, nei-
ther major party fielded a presidential candidate who
was, by modern definition, a Christian. John Adams,
Unitarian, squared off against Thomas Jefferson,
freethinker.
These facts raise the question: Just how Christian
were the founders? More to the point, did the found-
ers intend the United States to be a “Christian nation”?
Scholars and school boards often differ on these issues.
By and Large, the FOunders
Were devOut Christians...
Christian conservatives point out that numerous
American leaders throughout history have charac-
terized the country as a Christian nation, beginning
with John Jay, the first chief justice of the United
States Supreme Court. The revolutionaries of 1776
often viewed the struggle in religious terms. Quite a
few believed that God had a special plan for America
to serve as an example to the world. The overwhelm-
ing majority of the colonists considered themselves
Christians. Today, 78 percent of Americans identify
themselves as such. If the term Christian nation merely
identifies the beliefs of the majority, it is undeniably an
accurate label.
To Christian conservatives who would like to
change what is taught in the schools, however, the
term means much more. They contend that American
law is based on the laws of Moses as set down in the
Bible. They also believe that America’s divine mission
is not just an opinion held by many people—it should
be taught as literal truth. Finally, according to this
group, the separation of church and state is a liberal
myth. The language of the First Amendment means
only that the national government should not prefer
one Protestant denomination over the others.
WhO OppOsed Mixing ChurCh and state
Mainstream scholars disagree with the previous
arguments, often vehemently. For example, Steven K.
Green, a professor at Willamette University in Oregon,
has searched for American court cases that reference
the laws of Moses. He found none.
Ultimately, opponents say, to argue that the found-
ers were not serious about the separation of church and
state is to ignore the plain language of the Constitution.
True, most of the founders were Christians, but they
were also steeped in Enlightenment rationalism
that rejected “enthusiasm” in religion. Enthusiasm
meant the spirit that allowed Protestant and Catholic
Europeans to kill one another in the name of God over
a period of two centuries. For the founders, mixing
church and government was a recipe for trouble.
FOr CritiCaL anaLysis
Today, candidates for president clearly benefit when they use reli-
gious language and when they are comfortable discussing their
faith. Is this at all troubling? Why or why not?
Just hOW Christian Were the FOunders?
Copyright 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.