Opera

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1

  1. Allanbrook, Wye Jamison. “Pro Marcellina: The Shape of Figaro,Act IV.”
    M&L63 (1982): 69–82.
    Disapproves of the customary cuts of numbers 24 and 25, since they con-
    tribute significantly to the plot and musical structure.

  2. Ruf, Wolfgang. Die Rezeption von Mozarts “Le nozze di Figaro” bei die
    Zeitgenossen.Beihefte zum Archiv für Musikwissenschaft, 16. Wiesbaden:
    Steiner, 1977. 148p. ISBN 3-515-02408-5. ML55 .A67 v.16.
    Compares the reception to that of Paisiello’s Il re Teodoro in Venezia.

  3. Noske, Fritz. “Social Tensions in Le nozze di Figaro.” M&L50–1 (January
    1969): 45–62.
    The opera has “no message: it does not propagate reform of the social order.
    Mozart only registers the social climate, without taking sides.” See next entry.

  4. Brophy, Brigid. “Figaro and the Limitations of Music.” M&L51 (1970):
    26–36.
    Disputes those, like Noske (#1328), who find a social theme in the opera and
    see no erotic desire in the count, only his wish to act like a nobleman. In any
    case, the class matter is in the libretto only; music cannot express it. Our con-
    cept of operatic characters is drawn from the words and dramatic action—the
    music of course reflects this. Melodic characterization is really mood painting.


See also #1268.


Die Zauberflöte


ASO1 (1976) and 101 (1987), COH (1991), ENOG 3 (1980), Rororo (1982).



  1. Schneider, Otto. “Die Zauberflöte in der Literatur: Ein bibliographisches
    Überblick.” Österreichische Musikzeitschrift22–8 (August 1967): 458–464.
    An annotated list of 300 writings on the opera, useful despite a crowded narra-
    tive format.

  2. Eckelmeyer, Judith A. The Cultural Context of Mozart’s “Magic Flute”:
    Social, Aesthetic, Philosophical.Lewiston, N.Y.: E. Mellen, 1991. V.1: viii,
    329p. ISBN 0-7734-9642-4. ML410 .M95 E19.
    A second volume was not seen, but it is described in the first as consisting of
    three appendixes: a libretto of the opera; a letter from Gottfried van Swieten to
    Joseph II with a reply; and the text of a Masonic writing by Christian
    Rosenkreuz, who gave his name to the Rosicrucians. V.1 explains the impor-
    tance of these sources, then goes on to describe the opera in detail with both
    text and musical structure in mind. The libretto is “a message of struggle
    toward a better world, a regenerated and transformed society.” Musically, the
    work is “an enormous sonata, consisting of the usual exposition, develop-
    ment, and recapitulation.” (See also next entry.) With a line-by-line account of
    Mozart’s changes to the Schikaneder libretto.


Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart 255

Free download pdf