AP Psychology

(Marvins-Underground-K-12) #1

Free ebooks ==> http://www.Ebook777.com


All participants, also called subjects,attend the same two sessions upon which the quiz is based.
The experimental group is permitted to study for the quiz for 1 hour in the evening before
going to sleep while the control group watches an unrelated comedy show. The control
group studies for the quiz for 1 hour in the morning after awakening. The experimental group
watches the comedy show in the morning at the same time. Everyone eats breakfast together,
then they all take the same quiz. If the experimental group scores significantly higher than the
control group, the experimenter can say that the results support the hypothesis. How does
the experimenter measure effectiveness of studying? The experimenter uses the score on the quiz
as the operational definition of effectiveness of studying. An operational definitiondescribes
the specific procedure used to determine the presence of a variable.
In order to attribute a particular result to a specific factor, the controlled experiment
must limit variables. Confounding variables that could contribute to the effect must be
eliminated. Subjects in the biology quiz experiment need to share the same environmental
factors; they need to eat the same foods, sleep in similar beds in the same rooms, sleep for
the same amount of time, etc.


Eliminating Confounding Variables


Experimenter bias (also called the experimenter expectancy effect)is a phenomenon that
occurs when a researcher’s expectations or preferences about the outcome of a study influ-
ence the results obtained. This is a special kind of confounding variable that can occur
when a researcher is unaware that he or she is treating either the experimental group or con-
trol group differently from the other. A simple smile when addressing the experimental
group that is not also shown to the control group qualifies as experimenter bias and as a
confounding variable. The clues participants discover about the purpose of the study,
including rumors they hear about the study suggesting how they should respond, are called
demand characteristics.To eliminate the effects of demand characteristics, experimenters
use the single-blind procedure,a research design in which the participants don’t know
which treatment group—experimental or control—they are in. To eliminate the effects of
both experimenter bias and demand characteristics, experimenters use the double-blind
procedure,a research design in which neither the experimenter nor the participants know
who is in the experimental group and who is in the control group. The double-blind is most
easily accomplished when a second experimenter or assistant who doesn’t know the hypoth-
esis or group assignments administers the experiment, keeping the principal investigator
away from the subjects. When a number of factors might be responsible for an observed
effect, to determine which deserves the credit, an experimenter needs to systematically
manipulate or vary one or more factors while holding constant all the others that might be
important. The effects of these manipulated events on some behavioral reaction are then
assessed. It is then possible to demonstrate whether one factor is responsible for the result
or if an interacting package of factors is involved.
In experiments involving drugs, participants in the experimental group usually receive
the drug with the active ingredient, while subjects in the control condition receive a drug
that seems identical, but lacks the active ingredient. The imitation pill, injection, patch, or
other treatment is called a placebo.Subjects sometimes believe that the treatment will be
effective, and they think they experience an improvement in health or well-being. This is
theplacebo effect.The placebo effect is now used to describe any cases when experimen-
tal participants change their behavior in the absence of any kind of experimental manipu-
lation. The experiments need not involve drugs at all.
A research design that uses each participant as his or her own control is called a within-
subjects design.For example, the behavior of an experimental participant before receiving
treatment might be compared to his or her behavior after receiving treatment. Two treatments
might be tried. If two treatments are used, the order of the treatments could cause an effect.


Research Methods ❮ 53

http://www.Ebook777.com

Free download pdf