Early Representatives of the Genus Homo 167
australopithecines became extinct around 1 mya, the ro-
bust forms underwent relatively little change.^19
Evidently, the pattern in early human evolution has
been relatively short periods of marked change with
diversification, separated by prolonged periods of relative
stasis or stability in the surviving species. While robust
australopithecines continued this pattern, the new genus
Homo began a steady course of brain expansion that con-
tinued over the next 2.3 million years until brain size
reached its current state. With the appearance of this new
larger-brained hominin, the first stone tools appear in the
archaeological record.
Early Representatives
of the Genus Homo
Just as the Leakeys thought, Olduvai Gorge with its stone
tool assemblages was a good place to search for human
ancestors. Part of what is now Olduvai Gorge was once a
lake. Almost 2 mya, its shores were inhabited by numerous
wild animals including a variety of bipeds. In 1959—when
the Leakeys found the bones of the first specimen of robust
Australopithecus boisei in association with some of these
tools and the bones of birds, reptiles, antelopes, and pigs—
they thought they had found the remains of one of the tool-
makers. Fossils unearthed a few months later and a few feet
below this first discovery led them to change their mind.
These fossil remains consisted of more than one
individual, including a few cranial bones, a lower jaw, a
clavicle, some finger bones (Figure 7.16), and the nearly
complete left foot of an adult (Figure 7.17). Skull and jaw
fragments indicated that these specimens represented
a larger-brained biped without the specialized chewing
apparatus of the robust australopithecines.
The Leakeys and colleagues named that contempo-
rary Homo habilis (Latin for “handy man”) and suggested
that tool-wielding H. habilis may have eaten the animals
and possibly had the Australopithecus boisei for dessert.
Of course, we do not really know whether A. boisei from
Olduvai Gorge met its end in this way, but we do know that
cut marks from a stone tool are present on a 2.4-million-
year-old australopithecine jaw bone from South Africa.^20
This was done, presumably, to remove the mandible, but
for what purpose we do not know. In any event, it does
lend credibility to the idea of A. boisei on occasion being
dismembered by H. habilis.
Subsequent work at Olduvai has unearthed not only
more skull fragments but other parts of the skeleton of
Consistent with Wheeler’s hypothesis is the fact that the
system for drainage of the blood from the cranium of the
earlier australopithecines is significantly different from
that of the genus Homo (Figure 7.15).
Though paleoanthropologists cannot resolve every
detail of the course of human evolution from the available
data, over time the narrative they have constructed has
improved. Human evolution evidently took place in fits
and starts, rather than at a steady pace. Today we know
that bipedalism preceded brain expansion by several mil-
lion years. Bipedalism likely occurred as a sudden shift
in body plan, while the tempo for the evolution of brain
size differed considerably. For example, fragments of an
Australopithecus skull dated to 3.9 million years old are
virtually identical to the corresponding skull fragments
a million years later. Evidently, once a viable bipedal ad-
aptation was achieved, stabilizing selection took over, and
there was little change for at least a few million years.
Then, 2.5 mya, change was again in the works, result-
ing in the branching out of new forms, including sev-
eral robust species as well as the first appearance of the
genus Homo. But again, from about 2.3 mya until robust
Scalp vein
Emissary vein
Skull
Skull (Diploic) vein
Venous sinus Meningeal veins
Brain
External
jugular
vein
Internal
jugular
vein
Internal
carotid
artery
External
carotid
artery
Figure 7.15 In humans, blood from the face and scalp, instead
of returning directly to the heart, may be directed instead into the
braincase and then to the heart. Already cooled at the surface of
the skin, blood is able to carry heat away from the brain.
(^19) Wood, B., Wood, C., & Konigsberg, L. (1994). Paranthropus boisei:
An example of evolutionary stasis? American Journal of Physical
Anthropology 95, 134.
(^20) White, T. D., & Toth, N. (2000). Cutmarks on a Plio-Pleistocene hominid
from Sterkfontein, South Africa. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
111, 579–584.