266 Psychology of Women and Gender
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice.Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Goldner, V. (1999). Morality and multiplicity: Perspectives on the
treatment of violence in intimate life. Journal of Marital and
Family Therapy, 25,325–336.
Goldner, V., Penn, P., Sheinberg, M., & Walker, G. (1990). Love and
violence: Gender paradoxes in volatile attachments. Family
Process, 29,343–364.
Goodrich, T. J. (Ed.). (1991). Women and power: Perspectives for
therapy.New York: Norton.
Gordon, M. T., & Riger, S. (1989). The female fear: The social cost
of rape.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus.New
York: HarperCollins.
Greene, B., White, J. C., Whitten, L., & Jackson, L. C. (Eds.). (2000).
Psychotherapy with African American women: Innovations in psy-
chodynamic perspective and practice.New York: Guilford Press.
Groneman, C. (1994). Nymphomania: The historical construction of
female sexuality. Signs, 19,337–367.
Grossman, F. K., Kruger, L., & Moore, R. P. (2000). Reflections on
a feminist research project: Subjectivity and the wish for inti-
macy and equality. In E. B. Kimmel & M. Crawford (Eds.), In-
novations in feminist psychological research(pp. 117–135).
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace.San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
Haaken, J. (1998). Pillar of salt.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
University.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in
feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Stud-
ies, 14,575–599.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism.Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
Hare-Mustin, R. T. (1974). Ethical considerations in the use of sex-
ual contact in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 11,308–310.
Hare-Mustin, R. T. (1991). Sex, lies, and headaches: The problem is
power. In T. J. Goodrich (Ed.), Women and power: Perspectives
for therapy(pp. 63–85). New York: Norton.
Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1986). Autonomy and gender:
Some questions for therapists. Psychotherapy, 23,205–212.
Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1988). The meaning of differ-
ence: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American
Psychologist, 43,455–464.
Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1990). Making a difference: Psy-
chology and the construction of gender.New Haven, CT: Yale
University Press.
Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
Herman, J. (1992). Trauma and recovery.New York: Basic Books.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1914). Variability as related to sex differences in
achievement.American Journal of Sociology, 19,510– 530.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1916). Social devices for impelling women to
bear children. American Journal of Sociology, 22,19–29.
Horner, M. S. (1970). Femininity and successful achievement:
A basic inconsistency. In J. M. Bardwick, E. Douvan, M. S.
Horner, & D. Gutman (Eds.), Feminine personality and conflict
(pp. 45–74). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Hurtado, A. (1989). Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in
the subordination of White women and women of color. Signs:
Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14, 833–855.
Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. (1988). Sex differences in verbal ability: A
meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 104,53–69.
Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Quantitative synthesis of
social psychological research. In H. T. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.),
Handbook of research methods in social and personality
psychology(pp. 496–528). New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Johnson, N. G., Roberts, M. C., & Worell, J. (Eds.). (1999). Beyond
appearance: A new look at adolescent girls.Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
Jordan, J. V., Kaplan, A. G., Miller, J. B., Stiver, I. P., & Surrey, J.
(1991).Women’s growth in connection.New York: Guilford
Press.
Kaschak, E. (1992). Engendered lives.New York: HarperCollins.
Katz, P. (1991). Women, psychology, and social issues research.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15,665–675.
Kessler, S., & McKenna, S. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodologi-
cal approach.New York: Wiley.
Kimmel, E. B. (1974). The status of women in the southeast: A case
study. American Psychologist, 29,519–540.
Kimmel, E. B., & Crawford, M. (Eds.). (2000). Innovations in fem-
inist psychological research.New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Kitzinger, C. (1994). Should psychologists study sex differences?
Feminism and Psychology, 4,501–546.
Koss, M. P. (1993). Rape: Scope, impact, interventions, and public
policy responses. American Psychologist, 48,1062–1069.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place.New York: Harper
& Row.
Lamb, S. (1996). The trouble with blame: Victims, perpetrators, and
responsibility.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lamb, S. (1999). New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with
the concept.New York: New York University Press.
Landrine, H. (1995). Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychol-
ogy: Theory, research, and practice.Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
Lerman, H. (1976). What happens in feminist therapy? In S. Cox
(Ed.),Female psychology: The emerging self.Chicago: Science
Research Associates.
Lerner, H. G. (1988). Women in therapy.New York: Harper & Row.
Lykes, M. B. (1989). Dialogue with Guatemalan Indian women:
Critical perspectives on constructing collaborative research. In